Hi, Of course we smelt a rat.
As soon as that comment came out, I gave up on even reading the discourse that followed. Fundamentally many of the commentators do not realise that forcing people to participate - i.e. forcing reply-to to be public - (imagine be *required* to attend *every* Python-related meetup in London; no matter what) simply does not work. No technical means to enforce / create a community has worked. Enough people elaborated on the (many) technical pitfalls of having reply-to, so I won't, the community one is often overlooked. Anand On 8 January 2013 19:02, Jonathan Hartley <tart...@tartley.com> wrote: > On 03/01/2013 23:19, Michael Foord wrote: > >>> > > FWIW on lists where reply-to goes to the individual I *very* >>> > > regularly see messages accidentally sent only to the original sender >>> > > and not to the list. > > > Does anyone else smell a rat? How would he know???? Is Mr Foord READING ALL > OUR EMAILS!?!?!?! > > Thank you all for providing a stream of giggles to brighten my day. > > -- > Jonathan Hartley tart...@tartley.com http://tartley.com > Made of meat. +44 7737 062 225 twitter/skype: tartley > > > _______________________________________________ > python-uk mailing list > python-uk@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk > -- “Don’t be sad because it’s over. Smile because it happened.” – Dr. Seuss _______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
