On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:57:11AM +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this? Anyone any thoughts about it?
>
> https://people.cs.clemson.edu/~malloy/publications/papers/esem2017/paper.pdf
I think the biggest assumption here is that existing projects both need to use
new features ad
I haven't seen it before, but from the abstract, their central result is that
most projects are maintaining compatibility with Python 2. This doesn't come as
a surprise, but I'd add the words "so far".
They cloned repositories in March 2017. In fact, they already picked up IPython
and Django mo
Hi,
I got a link to this paper on another email list. The person there thought it
might enable Python 2 to have a new resurgence and lead to the death of Python
3. I am not entirely sure he was joking. Personally I am not sure the paper is
sound in that they seem to be making assumptions and thenc
