Hi, I got a link to this paper on another email list. The person there thought it might enable Python 2 to have a new resurgence and lead to the death of Python 3. I am not entirely sure he was joking. Personally I am not sure the paper is sound in that they seem to be making assumptions and thence deductions that the sample doesn't support.
Has anyone else seen this? Anyone any thoughts about it? https://people.cs.clemson.edu/~malloy/publications/papers/esem2017/paper.pdf -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
