Re: [Python-modules-team] Backporting of python-zmq

2013-09-14 Thread Joe Healy
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:36:59PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > My sponsor (Martin Krafft) is able to, but where possible would > > prefer the package maintainer to do so. > > (it just seems to make more senseā€¦) I'm wondering where we got to with this. In terms of timing, the version of sal

Re: [Python-modules-team] Backporting of python-zmq

2013-09-09 Thread Alexander Wirt
martin f krafft schrieb am Monday, den 09. September 2013: > also sprach Joe Healy [2013.09.09.1458 +0200]: > > The package in question this time is libzmq3. As it is not in stable > > at all, I assume that an unversioned dependency will be sufficient. > > Yes, if the dependency cannot be satisf

Re: [Python-modules-team] Backporting of python-zmq

2013-09-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Joe Healy [2013.09.09.1458 +0200]: > The package in question this time is libzmq3. As it is not in stable > at all, I assume that an unversioned dependency will be sufficient. Yes, if the dependency cannot be satisfied from stable, I think that backports will be used. Essentially it d

Re: [Python-modules-team] Backporting of python-zmq

2013-09-09 Thread Joe Healy
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:36 PM, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Joe Healy [2013.09.08.1538 +0200]: >> My understanding is that backports are built against other backports, >> but I have not yet witnessed it personally. > > This is not the case. Backports are built against stable as much as

Re: [Python-modules-team] Backporting of python-zmq

2013-09-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Joe Healy [2013.09.08.1538 +0200]: > My understanding is that backports are built against other backports, > but I have not yet witnessed it personally. This is not the case. Backports are built against stable as much as possible. If you need a backport, you have to version the build-

Re: [Python-modules-team] Backporting of python-zmq

2013-09-08 Thread Joe Healy
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 04.09.2013 17:37, Joe Healy wrote: >> Hi Julian, >> >> I've backported python-zmq to squeeze and wheezy. There was some minor >> work required for squeeze, but wheezy was trivial. > > As I understand the point is to have zmq3 based pyzmq i

Re: [Python-modules-team] Backporting of python-zmq

2013-09-08 Thread Julian Taylor
On 04.09.2013 17:37, Joe Healy wrote: > Hi Julian, > > I've backported python-zmq to squeeze and wheezy. There was some minor > work required for squeeze, but wheezy was trivial. As I understand the point is to have zmq3 based pyzmq in wheezy and squeeze. Don't you need to add a versioned build d

[Python-modules-team] Backporting of python-zmq

2013-09-04 Thread Joe Healy
Hi Julian, I've backported python-zmq to squeeze and wheezy. There was some minor work required for squeeze, but wheezy was trivial. For squeeze, I have unfortunately removed support for python 2.5 and 3.1 due to use of the construct described at [1]. It could be patched in, but I feel the work i