On 11 avr, 12:14, bdsatish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The built-in function round( ) will always "round up", that is 1.5 is
> rounded to 2.0 and 2.5 is rounded to 3.0.
>
> If I want to round to the nearest even, that is
>
> my_round(1.5) = 2# As expected
> my_round(2.5) = 2# Not 3
On 11 avr, 14:14, Gerard Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2:05 pm, Gerard Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 11, 12:14 pm, bdsatish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The built-in function round( ) will always "round up", that is 1.5 is
> > > rounded to 2.0 and 2.5 is
On 14 avr, 17:23, Janto Dreijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems eval is modifying the passed in locals/globals. This is
> behaviour I did not expect and is really messing up my web.py app.
>
> Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Mar 7 2008, 04:10:12)
> [GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16
On 14 avr, 18:05, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Janto Dreijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems eval is modifying the passed in locals/globals. This is
> > behaviour I did not expect and is really messing up my web.py app.
>
> > Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Mar 7 2008, 04:10:12)
> >
On 14 avr, 20:02, Thomas Dybdahl Ahle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 03:14 -0700, bdsatish wrote:
> > The built-in function round( ) will always "round up", that is 1.5 is
> > rounded to 2.0 and 2.5 is rounded to 3.0.
>
> > If I want to round to the nearest even, that is
>
> > m
On 15 avr, 17:27, Reckoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would it be possible to use one of an object's methods without
> initializing the object?
>
> In other words, if I have:
>
> class Test:
> def __init__(self):
> print 'init'
> def foo(self):
> print 'foo'
>
> and I want to use
On 15 avr, 17:43, Robert Bossy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reckoner wrote:
> > would it be possible to use one of an object's methods without
> > initializing the object?
>
> > In other words, if I have:
>
> > class Test:
> > def __init__(self):
> > print 'init'
> > def foo(self):
> >
On 16 avr, 09:42, "Prashant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering is there any way to do this:
>
> I have written a class in python and __init__ goes like this:
>
> def __init__(self):
>
> self.name = 'jack'
> self.age = 50
>
> import data
>
> now here there is data.py in the same directory
On 16 avr, 15:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm new to Python and the notion of lambda, and I'm trying to write a
> function that would have a varying number of nested for loops
> depending on parameter n. This just smells like a job for lambda for
> me, but I can't figure out how
On 17 avr, 00:49, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:21:18 -0300, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> also i found a link which states 0^0 isnt 1 even though every
> >> calculator ive tried says it is.
> >> it doesnt s
On 17 avr, 14:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 17 Apr, 04:22, tgiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi, All!
>
> > I started back programming Python again after a hiatus of several
> > years and run into a sticky problem that I can't seem to fix,
> > regardless of how hard I try- it it start
On 17 avr, 17:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yuck! No way!! If you *want* to make your code that hard to read, I'm
> > sure you can find lots of ways to do so, even in Python, but don't
> > expect Python to change to help you toward such a dubious goal.
>
> Well, my actual code doesn't look lik
On 17 avr, 18:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Apr 17, 10:54 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On 17 avr, 17:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Out of sheer curiosity, why do you need thirty (hand-specified and
> > dutifully commented) names to the same constant object if you know
> > there will
13 matches
Mail list logo
