On Jun 24, 8:20 am, "Corey G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If Perl 6 ever does get on its feet and get released, how does it
> compare to Python 3000? Is Perl 6 more like Java now with Parrot? I
> just want to make sure that Python is staying competitive.
>
> If this is the wrong mailing list, j
On Jun 24, 5:38 am, "Mark Tolonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Andreu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messagenews:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Yes, ... don't ask me why, but in fact v1,v2,v3 = str1.split()
> > does not seem to work. My original problem was I forgot about
> > the parenthesis as Tim point
On Jun 24, 10:36 am, "Corey G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I meant, in terms of dealing with accurate or non-accurate rumors
> is with speed, yes. There are plenty of comparisons where Perl is
> 4-15x faster then Python for 'some' operations regarding regular
> expressions, etc.
>
> For me
On Jun 24, 10:38 am, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 9:03 am, eliben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What would be the quickest way to do this ? I think that for dec2bin
> > conversion, using hex() and then looping with a hex->bin lookup table
> > would be probably much fast
And:
# return as a string
def itob_string(integer, count = 8):
return "".join(str((integer >> i) & 1) for i in range(count - 1,
-1, -1))
# return as an iterator (i.e [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0])
def itob_list(integer, count = 8):
return [(integer >> i) & 1 for i in range(count - 1, -1, -1)]
On Jun 25, 11:55 am, antar2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a beginner in Python and am not able to use a list element for
> regular expression, substitutions.
>
> list1 = [ 'a', 'o' ]
> list2 = ['star', 'day', 'work', 'hello']
>
> Suppose that I want to substitute the vowels from lis
On Jun 25, 12:38 pm, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> If you're into clickodroms, you may want to have a look at Eric too.
> >> As far as i'm concerned, I still wait for something that would be
> >> worth dropping
I've written up a little piece of code that isn't that foolproof to
scan through a file (java presently) to find functions and then look
for them throughout the document and output the name of the function,
followed by how many times it appears and the lines it appears on.
What I was looking for w
On Jun 26, 5:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cédric Lucantis:
>
> > PAT = re.compile('^[ ]*(public|protected|private)[ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)
> > [ ]+([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)[ ]+\((.*)\).*$')
> > ...
> > It might be hard to read but will avoid a lot of obscure parsing code.
>
> You can use the VERBOSE mode, to
In case anyone is interested...
# Retrieved from:
http://en.literateprograms.org/Fibonacci_numbers_(Python)?oldid=10746
# Recursion with memoization
memo = {0:0, 1:1}
def fib(n):
if not n in memo:
memo[n] = fib(n-1) + fib(n-2)
return memo[n]
# Quick exact computation of large in
On Jun 28, 8:41 pm, Thierry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ie:
> > @if os.exists(foo):
> >etc
> >etc
>
> > and
>
> > @for blah:
> >etc
> >etc
>
> This sounds more like PHP code, where a @ prefixing a function means
> that even if there are errors or warnings, you don't want to see t
I am really stuck presently, trying to install these on my Windows XP.
I have downloaded easy_install and it is now in Python25\Scripts but
none of the commands I have read in either program folder have worked
to install them.
I was hoping someone could give me a step by step guide to installing
t
On Jul 7, 11:55 am, "A.T.Hofkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-07-07, abhishek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > hey guys...me nu 2 python yo...help me...by da way...jus joined
> > inthanks
>
> Ask a specific question and you may get an answer.
>
> If you want an answer from me, it helps
On Jul 7, 3:47 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> (snip)
>
> > However welcome to Python and this Google
> > Group.
>
>
> This is *not* a google group. This is the usenet newsgroup
> comp.lang.python, made accessible TTW by google.
>
Touche ;)
--
http://mail.python.o
>
> My question is: did something about the way the special method names are
> implemented change for new-style classes?
>
>>> class old:
pass
>>> class new(object):
pass
>>> testone = old()
>>> testone.__call__ = lambda : 33
>>> testone()
33
>>> testtwo = new()
>>> testtwo.__cal
On Jul 9, 2:08 am, Ben Keshet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi fans,
>
> I want to use a 'for' iteration to manipulate files in a set of folders,
> something like:
>
> folders= ['1A28','1A6W','56Y7']
> for x in folders:
> print x # print the current folder
> f = open('my/path/way/x/my_fi
def ine(you):
yourself = "what?"
go = list("something"), list("anything")
be = "something"
please = be, yourself
yourself = "great"
for good in yourself:
if you is good:
good in you
please.add(more, good)
else:
def inition(lacks, c
>
> just... great !-)
>
Thanks :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
> zip(*vec_list) will zip together all entries in vec_list
> Do be aware that zip stops on the shortest iterable. So if vec[1] is
> shorter than vec[0] and matches otherwise, your output line will be
> truncated. Or if vec[1] is longer and vec[0] matches as far as it goes,
> there will be no si
On Jul 21, 10:17 am, "甜瓜" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm confused about the motivation of releasing python2.6 and python3.0
> at the *same* time. IMO, 2.6 should be compatible with 2.5 while 3.0
> is new style python. Currenly, most python projects works fine in 2.5.
> When 3.0 becomes
On Jul 22, 5:59 am, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2008-07-22, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> You talk about "writing it in assembly language for each MPU
> >> chip". Actually it is even better than that. We now have
> >> these modern invention
>
> Please understand that I'm not arguing about this particular design
> choice (and FWIW, I'd mostly agree on the point that having a != b
> different from not (a == b) is actually a wart). I'm just correcting
> your statement about the behaviour of __eq__ / __ne__ not being
> documented, which i
On Jul 24, 3:53 pm, Brett Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After many years happily coding Perl, I'm looking to expand my
> horizons. [no flames please, I'm pretty aware of Perl's strengths and
> weaknesses and I'm just here to learn more, not to enter religious
> debates].
>
> I've gone through
>
> My words aren't as clear as they should be. I mean that Python lets
> *you* do something without documenting, or rather stating to use a
> better term, that your intention is the non-obvious one. I'm not
> saying that Python itself lacks documentation for its own behaviour;
> I'm saying it shou
>
> By that logic, C++ is not OO. By that logic, Ruby is not OO. By that
> logic, I know of only one OO language: Java :)
>
> The fact that a language doesn't force you to do object-oriented
> programming doesn't mean that it's not object-oriented. In other
> words, your words are nonsense.
>
No,
>
> Honestly, performance benchmarks seem to be the dick size comparison
> of programming languages.
>
But in the honour of dick size:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/debian/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
--
http://mail.pyth
On Aug 8, 9:08 am, alex23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2:49 pm, Dhananjay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is it that a question of time and effort,
> > or is there something that doesn't make it appropriate to python ?
>
> I don't think I've ever seen anyone who has raised concerns about
On Aug 11, 10:55 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Aug 10, 10:10 pm, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > jlist wrote:
> > > I think what makes more sense is to compare the code one most
> > > typically writes. In my case, I always use range() and never use psyco.
> > > But I guess for mo
On Apr 2, 3:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the following code on the net -
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-python-cvs/200509.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
>
> def count(self):
> -db = sqlite.connect(self.filename,
> isolation_level=ISOLATION_LEVEL)
> -
def s(c):return[]if c==[]else s([_ for _ in c[1:]if _=c[0]])
Anyone else got some wonders...?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I was wondering if anyone knew of some online (free if possible)
advanced tutorials, especially ones that provides tasks and ideas for
small projects. The issue for myself is I want to improve my python
programming level, and my ability to program in general, but come up
blank thinking of a possibl
Just a random check. Is __gsignals__ a builtin type? Else it would
probably be better not to include the postfix underscores. Though I
might be wrong here. Otherwise seems pretty good and well organised. I
hate it when people go comment mad, but you've kept them to the places
where an explanation i
'I have designed a program with more than 500 if elif else'
This was your first mistake...
(ii) x3=x1.find(x2)
returns an integer corresponding to the start position in x1 where it
found x2, otherwise it will return -1.
(i) ...
what kind of vague numbers? It should just give you an integer
res
>
> I have a car. I have turned the ignition key but it fails to start.
> Please tell me what is wrong with it.
>
The engine is missing! Am I close?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Umm, Mesopotamia is an area geographically located between the Tigris
and Euphrates rivers, Bangalore isn't anywhere near that. And most of
that is presently under American control.
If you don't want to give out your code then try explaining it better.
What is the input, what is the output, how ar
In general you should only catch the exceptions you want to catch,
therefore avoiding the issue of catching "unexpected" ones, for
instances the programming unexpectandly closing.
Well, exception handling is expensive (when it catches one) so it
really is up to you. If you are using eval and know
> def Calc():
> global nbr
> try:
> print eval(nbr)
> #a = Label(mygui, text=eval(nbr))
> #a.place(relx=0.4, rely=0.1, anchor=CENTER)
> except:
> print "Not computable"
> nbr = ""
>
> def Erase():
> global nbr
> nbr = ""
Seems to me you could
> the erase() id alwys need if u wanna abort whilst u wrote something.
But if it is meant to only evaluate once you've pressed the enter key
(I take it?) you shouldn't need that. And if you are to abort while
evaluating it will not do that.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
> This for me is Python's chief selling point: dir()dir() and
> help(). Python's two selling points are dir(), help(), and very
> readable code. Python's *three* selling points are dir(),
> help(), very readable code, and an almost fanatical devotion to
> the BFDL. Amongst Python's sellin
couldn't you just do.
#untested
new_round(n):
answer = round(n)
# is answer now odd
if answer % 2:
return answer - 1
else:
return answer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 11, 1:19 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> couldn't you just do.
>
> #untested
> new_round(n):
> answer = round(n)
> # is answer now odd
> if answer % 2:
> return answer - 1
> else:
> return answer
Whoops, this also affects odd numbers...
Will try and find a GOOD solution late
Civilisation 4 uses Python everywhere and is the main tool used by
Modders of the game.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
| # Double Quote Text
|"# match a double quote
|(# - Two Possiblities:
|\\. # match two backslashes followed by anything
(include newline)
||# OR
|[^"]
>
> A rather off-topic and perhaps naive question, but isn't a 1:4
> production/test ratio a bit too much ? Is there a guesstimate of what
> percentage of this test code tests for things that you would get for
> free in a statically typed language ? I'm just curious whether this
> argument against
2.5 seems the defacto standard now for a new user, NB: probably not
the standard for the common business productions. However are you on
Windows or *nix? *nix may ship a certain version, so for ease of use
it would be best to use that.
Personally I use 2.5 because it is a complete version, and the
On May 6, 12:22 pm, Boris Borcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duncan Booth wrote:
> > Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> The biggest ugliness though is ",".join(). No idea why this should
> >> be better than join(list, separator=" "). Besides, ",".join(u"x")
> >> yields an unicode
> I would imagine this is why I haven't found any schools teaching
> Python in their basic programming classes too. On the dynamic typing,
> isn't that the same sort of thing that lots of scripting languages
> do? VBScript doesn't require you to define your variables, but I
> don't really want to
On May 6, 5:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi - further to my earlier query regarding partial matches (which with
> all your replies enabled me to advance my understanding, thanks), I
> now need to reverse a dict.
>
> I know how to reverse a list (with the reverse method - very handy),
> but it
On May 7, 4:08 pm, brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to compare two dicts that should have identical info just in a
> different data structure. The first dict's contents look like this. It
> is authoritative... I know for sure it has the correct key value pairs:
>
> {'001' : '01'}
>
> The se
On May 7, 4:08 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> hi All,
> I have no idea why I need to learn a new scripting language,
> nothing much to the sytnax,
> I need to understand what could be the prupose of another scripting
> language
>
> Cna you please help me with this,
> Is there
C#
using System;
namespace HelloWorld
{
Class HelloWorld
{
static void Main(String[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("Hello World");
}
}
}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>>> key = ''.join(sorted(word))
I tend to strip and lower the word as well, otherwise "Hello" and
"hello" do not compare...depends on what you want though!
Plus you might get a lot of "word\n" as keys...
My technique is the this way
def anagram_finder(words):
anagrams = {}
for word in wo
On Aug 18, 5:57 pm, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm probably missing something obvious but I can't put my finger on
> it:
>
> >>> (3 in [3]) == True
>
> True
>
> >>> 3 in ([3] == True)
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> TypeError: argument of type 'bool
On Aug 22, 11:13 am, Bart van Deenen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I've stumbled onto a python behavior that I don't understand at all.
>
> Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:28:52)
>
> # function
> def X(l=[]):
> l.append(1)
> print l
>
> # first call of X
> X()
> [1]
>
> #
101 - 154 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
