> > A rather off-topic and perhaps naive question, but isn't a 1:4 > production/test ratio a bit too much ? Is there a guesstimate of what > percentage of this test code tests for things that you would get for > free in a statically typed language ? I'm just curious whether this > argument against dynamic typing - that you end up doing the job of a > static compiler in test code - holds in practice. > > George
To me it seems like more of an argument for a (more) concise Test Framework for Python, or at least a fully fledge IDE beyond pyDev. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
