Is there a way to find the name of a page you are retrieving using
python. For example, if I get http://www.cnn.com/ i want to know that
the page is index.html. I can do this using wget. as seen in the code
below. Can I do this in python?
Thanks,
$ wget cnn.com
--11:15:25-- http://cnn.com/
I have been fighting the same bug for weeks now with zero success: I
am trying to get images to come up on my buttons, but they are way too
small. Regardless of whether I used my old Python 2.5.1 or now 2.6.5,
the following code:
'''Minesweeper.'''
from Tkinter import *
#from
o dig the garden, but
you wouldn't if a spade was available). Similarly with computer
languages - some are better for certain tasks than others, but I don't
think 'expressiveness' is the way to describe that.
Pete Barrett
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
depth explanation of how this
is working. I am trying to learn as much as possible about the actual
python internals.
Thanks in advance!
-Barrett
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
> However, ignored() is actually implemented as a generator function
>
with the @contextmanager decorator shortcut. This decorator takes a
> generator function and wraps it up as a class with the necessary
> __enter__ and __exit__ methods. The __enter__ method in this case
> calls the .next() m
I am viewing it on Chrome Version 26.0.1410.43 m for windows and it works
perfectly for me.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Barrett Lewis
> wrote:
> > I looked up the source to the decorator
> > found here:
>
> For example, if the input stream contained the text:
> [1, # python should ignore this comment
> 2]
>
> and I do a "read" on it, I should obtain the result
> [1, 2]
> --
>
I don't know much about lisp but given that input and the desired output
you can write functions like the following
def str
Do you happen to be on windows? Because if you are then you need to edit
the registry. If you are on windows let me know and I will walk you through
the fix, but if not then it would be a waste of time for me to explain it.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> d = {}
> for key, d[key] in (("this",18), ("that",17), ("other",38)):
> print key
> do_something(d)
>
Why not use a dict comprehension?
d = {k:v for k,v in (("this",18), ("that",17), ("other",38))}
I feel this is more straightforward and easier to read. the results are the
same how
> In the particular case I did it in, I needed the incremental results
> passed to a function, not just the final result. I don't think this
> made it into the final code, rather it was expanded to be more
> readable. But the discovery made me feel a disturbance in the
> Pythonic force of the uni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>Can a jet fuel/hydrocarbon fire collapse a steel structure? An
>> >>experiment.
>>
>> > [snip]
>> > Run your "experiment" again but add some pure oxygen such as was
>> > escaping from the on-board breathing oxygen tanks on the
>> >
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Feb 2, 10:32 pm, "John Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
>> >> > [snip]
>> >> > Run your "experiment"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Feb 2, 10:32 pm, "John Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
>> >> > [snip]
>> >> > Run your "experiment"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Feb 2, 10:32 pm, "John Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
>> >> > [snip]
>> >> > Run your "experiment"
Hi there,
My first post here, so hello :)
Just a little background, I am writing my dissertation, which is a JIT
compiler based upon LLVM and it's python bindings, along with the
aperiot LL(1) parser.
I have some code here, which is not behaving as I would expect. Could
someone enlighten me as t
Hi there,
First of all, thanks to everyone for replying. This has been a great
help.
On Mar 26, 4:21 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:36:49 -0700, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > My question is: why has 'parent_struct_sig' changed? I was under the
>
I've noticed that it's possible to create conflicting instances of the
collections.namedtuple class:
from collections import namedtuple as nt
IX = nt('X', 'a b')
IY = nt('Y', 'c d')
x = IX(0, 1)
y = IY(2, 3)
The above are non-conflicting class instances and of two distinct
namedtup
17 matches
Mail list logo
