evaluation question

2023-01-27 Thread Muttley
Hi This is probably a dumb newbie question but I've just started to learn python3 and eval() isn't behaving as I'd expect in that it works for some things and not others. eg: >>> eval("1+1") 2 >>> eval("print(123)") 123 >>> eval("for i in range(1,10): i") Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: evaluation question

2023-01-28 Thread Muttley
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 21:04:58 + Ben Bacarisse wrote: >mutt...@dastardlyhq.com writes: > >> Hi > >It looks like you posted this question via Usenet. comp.lang.python is >essentially dead as a Usenet group. It exists, and gets NNTP versions >of mail sent to the mailing list, but nothing posted

Re: evaluation question

2023-01-28 Thread Muttley
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:22:01 +1300 dn wrote: >On 28/01/2023 05.37, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >> This is probably a dumb newbie question but I've just started to learn >> python3 and eval() isn't behaving as I'd expect in that it works for >> some things and not others. eg: >> > eval("1+1

Re: evaluation question

2023-01-30 Thread Muttley
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 23:57:51 -0500 Thomas Passin wrote: >On 1/29/2023 4:15 PM, elvis-85...@notatla.org.uk wrote: >> On 2023-01-28, Louis Krupp wrote: >>> On 1/27/2023 9:37 AM, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >> >> >>> eval("print(123)") 123 >> >> >> Does OP expect the text to come fro

Re: evaluation question

2023-01-31 Thread Muttley
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:57:33 +1300 Greg Ewing wrote: >On 30/01/23 10:41 pm, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >> What was the point of the upheaval of converting >> the print command in python 2 into a function in python 3 if as a function >> print() doesn't return anything useful? > >It was made a f

Re: evaluation question

2023-02-01 Thread Muttley
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:17:33 +1300 dn wrote: >On 01/02/2023 11.59, Greg Ewing wrote: >> On 31/01/23 10:24 pm, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >>> All languages have their ugly corners due to initial design mistakes >>> and/or >>> constraints. Eg: java with the special behaviour of its string class,

Re: evaluation question

2023-02-01 Thread Muttley
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 21:00:53 + Mark Bourne wrote: >Greg Ewing wrote: >> On 30/01/23 10:41 pm, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >>> What was the point of the upheaval of converting >>> the print command in python 2 into a function in python 3 if as a >>> function >>> print() doesn't return anyth

Re: evaluation question

2023-02-01 Thread Muttley
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:59:25 +1300 Greg Ewing wrote: >On 31/01/23 10:24 pm, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >> All languages have their ugly corners due to initial design mistakes and/or >> constraints. Eg: java with the special behaviour of its string class, C++ >> with "=0" pure virtual declaratio

Re: evaluation question

2023-02-02 Thread Muttley
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 18:28:04 +0100 "Peter J. Holzer" wrote: >--b2nljkb3mdefsdhx >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >On 2023-02-01 09:00:39 -, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >> Its not evolution, its revolution.