On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:00:36 -0800, Scott David Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>G.Franzkowiak wrote:
>> Scott David Daniels schrieb:
>>
>>> franzkowiak wrote:
>>>
I've read some bytes from a file and just now I can't interpret 4
bytes in this dates like a real value. An extract f
I can see postings on google, but my news service
is having a problem since sometime during the weekend.
Can get old stuff from other n.g., but no new.
Wondering whether I'll see this via google.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
void )
>{
> int i, j;
> int ds;
> int u, v;
>
> /* setup rotor data */
> for (j=0;j<26;j++)
> data[4][j] = ((int)ref_rotor[j]-'A'+26)%26;
>
> for (i=1;i<4;i++)
> {
> step[i-1] = step_data[order[i-1]];
> for (j=0;j<26;j++)
> {
> data[i][j] = ((int)(rotor[order[i-1]][j])-'A' + 26) % 26;
> data[8-i][data[i][j]] = j;
> }
> }
>
>Now, do I need to start boning up on lists and how to use them or am I
>missing the bigger picture?? Again, for the complete code see
>http://home.earthlink.net/~lvraab. I'm not asking you to do it for me,
>just some pointers on going about this.
You are obviously not yet familiar with python, but a few hours with the
introduction and tutorials should help a lot. Then post something that
compiles. Or a snippet that does something you don't understand.
This is about all I have patience for this time. I really have other stuff to
do.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 17 Jan 2005 16:48:24 EST, Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>
>> I can see postings on google, but my news service
>> is having a problem since sometime during the weekend.
>> Can get old stuff from other n.g., but no new.
>>
ementation
>limitations is sold as a general principle.
People take short cuts in expressing themselves, just as you do.
E.g., you say "mutable key" when you really mean a value that will
remain constant while you are using it as a dictionary key. The "safe"
dictionary
that you are "thinking about" will apparently get its "safety" by ensuring that
the "mutable key" can't be "mutated" -- or do you want to discuss which copy
is the real "key" ;-) (I don't ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
deftime=time.ctime()):
return x*y, kw.get('which_time')=='now' and time.ctime() or deftime
Seem like a minor extension of the default-arg hack.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
s purity drives actual implementation, but purity issues
drive a lot of interesting, if not too practical, discussions. Of course, if
someone
has the energy to become champions of their ideas, and actually implement them
for testing and evaluation, more power to them. I don't think we shou
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:38:20 -0700, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> Which make me wonder what plans there are for providing a better
>> mechanism than default arguments as a way of initializing local function
>> variables. Nested def
like it expects to refer to the type,
not the arg
for elt2 in flatten(elt):
l.append(elt2)
else:
l.append(elt)
return l
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:55:53 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) wrote:
>What am I missing? (this is from 2.4b1, so probably it has been fixed?)
>
I googled and found a bug report, but initial report kind of passes on it
saying nested sequences will probably be tuples, so no pan
neral.
I can easily conceive of information that I'd rather not see publicized
without severe access controls. But in general I do believe in open sharing
of free information as the most productive for everyone.
>Exporting a machine gun is much different from publishing a
>description of one. Software is just a precise type of description.
Yeah, but ... ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ecursionlimit(n)
Set the maximum depth of the Python interpreter stack to n. This
limit prevents infinite recursion from causing an overflow of the C
stack and crashing Python. The highest possible limit is platform-
dependent.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>> v][0]:]
>>> for s in newbar: print repr(s)
...
'str_1 and str_2 both in line two'
'three'
'four'
'str_1 and str_2 both in line five'
'last line'
Alternatively:
>>> newbar = list(dropwhile(lambda x: 'str_1' not in x or 'str_2' not in x,
>>> bars))
>>> for s in newbar: print repr(s)
...
'str_1 and str_2 both in line two'
'three'
'four'
'str_1 and str_2 both in line five'
'last line'
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
oblems internally, and accepts keys and values of any type without wrapping
or other modification -- or do you want a wrapper that can make any object
suitable for use as key or value in python's curent definition of dict?
Just DYFR please. You still haven't you know ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
0 0101 0110 0111
1000 1001 1010 1011 1100 1101 1110
0001 00010001 00010010 00010011 00010100 00010101 00010110 00010111
[...snip stuff you can infer ...]
0111 01110001 01110010 01110011 01110100 01110101 01110110 01110111
0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 0101 0110 0111
Well, you get the idea.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
c(C.__init__)
(['self', 'a', 'b', 'c'], None, None, (1, 'bee', 1.2))
that you want by looking at the unbound method C.__init__
(though im_func may be deprecated eventually?):
>>> C.__init__.im_func.func_code.co_varnames
('self', 'a', 'b', 'c')
>>> C.__init__.im_func.func_defaults
(1, 'bee', 1.2)
or by getting the __init__ function as such, by avoiding the attribute
access that makes it and unbound or bound method
>>> C.__dict__['__init__'].func_code.co_varnames
('self', 'a', 'b', 'c')
>>> C.__dict__['__init__'].func_defaults
(1, 'bee', 1.2)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
m W3C a long time ago.
... I see the third edition at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ is differently
styled,
(I guess new style sheets) but still pretty readable (glancing at it now).
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
7:-1025:P 26:Q 27:10
-26:-Q-27:-R-28:-1026:Q 27:R 28:10
-27:-R-28:-S-29:-1027:R 28:S 29:10
-28:-S-29:-T-30:-1028:S 29:T 30:10
-29:-T-30:-U-31:-1029:T 30:U 31:10
-30:-U-31:-V-
provides fairly robust mechanism
>(called robustApply) for providing a set of possible arguments and using
>inspect to pick out which names match the parameters for a function in
>order to pass them in to the function/method/callable object. That
>said, doing this for __init__'s with attribute values from an object's
>dictionary doesn't really seem like the proper way to approach the problem.
Sounds like a workaround for parameter passing that maybe should have been
keyword-based?
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
cted, nor did the y = 123 show at 4:
But the d['z'] showed up immediately, as you might expect ... but d['z'] also
in that last returned locals(), which you might not expect, since there was
no assignment to bare z. But they are apparently the same dict object, so you
would expect it. So maybe there is some kind of finalization at exit like
closure
building. Anyway, d = dict(locals()) would probably behave differently, but I'm
going to leave to someone else ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
x27;.split(':'))
>>> print (a, b, c, d, e)
('a', 'b', 'c', None, None)
But then, might as well do:
>>> def bar(nreq, *args):
... if nreq <= len(args): return args[:nreq]
... return args+ (nreq-len(args))*(None,)
...
3 (3)
21 STORE_FAST 1 (c)
6 24 LOAD_CONST 4 (3.1415926535897931)
27 STORE_FAST 4 (pi)
7 30 LOAD_CONST 5 ()
33 CALL_FUNCTION0
36 RETURN_VALUE
&
01:47:27)
[GCC 3.2.3 (mingw special 20030504-1)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> help(''.ljust)
Help on built-in function ljust:
ljust(...)
S.ljust(width[, fillchar]) -> string
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:22:36 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:43:43 +1000, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>aurora wrote:
>>> I am think more in the line of string.ljust(). So if we have a
>>> list.ljust(lengt
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:14:10 -0700, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:22:33 +1000, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
[Steven Bethard]
>>>> > If you really want locals that d
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:31:17 -0700, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> So, e.g., for
>>
>> >>> presets = dict(a=1, b=2, deftime=__import__('time').ctime())
>>
>> in the decorator args, the next version wi
nking XML are you??!! For this, definitely
ick ;-)
>
What you want to do will depend on the big picture, which is not apparent yet
;-)
>
>Please reply when you guyes can get a chance.
>Thanks,
Sorry to give nothing but untested suggestion, but I have to go, and I
will be off line mostly for a while.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
:
"Kneeling, Cobb p
lanted a sturdy knee in the small of his back,")
funny that googling define:imbed gets nothing. Nor define:embed ??
I've had a number of misses in that kind of search. I wonder if it's
temporarily broken (or maybe it hit a licensing snag with the various
onl
4-1)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from ut.finfo import finfo
>>> finfo(finfo)
('finfo', 'ut.finfo', 'c:\\pywk\\ut\\finfo.pyc', 1106641080)
>>> import time
>>> time.ctime(finfo(finfo)[-1])
'Tue Jan 25 00:18:00 2005'
HIH
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:35:09 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:31:17 -0700, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Bengt Richter wrote:
>>> So, e.g., for
>>>
>>> >>> presets = dict(a=1, b=2, deftime
esponses in
>Windows is to write a kernel driver, and even then there are no guarantees.
>Windows is NOT a real-time system. If you have an environment where an
>unexpected delay of a millisecond or more is going to cause damage, then
>you need to redesign your application.
For sure. The big requirements picture is missing (not uncommon ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
s really that helpful?
def hamming():
def _hamming():
yield 1
for n in imerge(imap(lambda h: 2*h, iter(hg2)),
imerge(imap(lambda h: 3*h, iter(hg3)),
imap(lambda h: 5*h, iter(hg5:
yield n
hg2, hg3,
in problem with a CPU clock based reading is that it's very stable unless
there's variable clock rate due to power management.
Why am I doing this? ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:46:04 -0800, Jeff Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>
>> On 25 Jan 2005 08:30:03 GMT, Nick Craig-Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>If you are after readability, you might prefer this...
>>>
>
to example,
>>> print list(x for i,x in enumerate(x for x in xrange(1, 996) if x % 2 ==0)
>>> if i<3 or iter([]).next())[2]
6
or in case you just want one item as result,
>>> print list(x for i,x in enumerate(x for x in xrange(1, 996) if x % 2 ==0)
>>> if i==2 or i==3 and iter([]).next())[0]
6
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:46:30 +, Stephen Kellett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bengt Richter
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>I believe that is quite wrong as a general statement.
>
>Actually my initial statement should have been
uence gets larger. Of course, you can
>always use the standard
>C/C++ approach and pass the original sequence along with the (start,stop,step)
>indices of the slice,
>as Terry Reedy mentioned, but then you lose in expressiveness.
I didn't see the leadup to this, but what is the problem with just subclassing
tuple to
give you the views you want?
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
omeoffset+i*somefactor once you get past the limit checks for the virtual
slice. By the same token, transforming a few numbers of one virtual slice
into similar numbers for a a new virtual slice of that shouldn't be rocket
science.
And it wouldn't have to be done more than once. Don
ttribute
o.widget.datapoints[o.collector] = o.dispatcher(o.widget.current_value)
mywith()
Or if we had a lambda-replacing anonymous def permitting full suites:
(def(o=myobject):
# read a class attribute
print o.__class__.myattribute
# set an instance attribute
o.widget.datapoints[o.collector] = o.dispatcher(o.widget.current_value)
)()
Is a one-character prefix to the dot objectionable?
>> Also avoids those stupid little colons.
>
>Using := and = for assignment and equality is precisely as stupid as using
>= and == for assignment and equality. Perhaps less stupid: why do we use
>== for equals, but not ++ for plus and -- for minus?
>
I agree, but I think := would be nice in python for RE-binding an existing
binding, wherever it is seen from the local context. Thus you could
write
def foo(): x:=123
and
x = 456
def bar():
x = 789
foo() # finds and rebinds local x
print x
bar() # -> 123
print x # -> 456
foo() # finds and rebinds the global x
print x # -> 123
but
del x
foo() #-> NameError exception, can't find any x to rebind
hm, wandered a bit OT there, ;-/
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
print '>%s<' % PaddedStr2('xxx',5,'.')
>xxx..<
>>> print '>%s<' % PaddedStr2('xxx',3,'.')
>xxx<
>>> print '>%s<' % PaddedStr2('xxx',2,'.')
>xxx<
(T
n F
Found a Foo
Found a U
Found an Uhuh
Returning info rather than printing to stdout allows you
to access and use it differently, e.g.,
>>> items[3].art_name()
('a', 'Foo')
>>> items[3].art_name()[1]
'Foo'
(Don't know if the a/an logic is really general ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e("%s\n"%str(doc))
return
except AttributeError:
pass
[1] --> self.stdout.write("%s\n"%str(self.nohelp % (arg,)))
return
func()
else:
# ... generates topic listing
Probably you can write your own Cmd subclass and override do_help
and modify at [1] to do the pydoc call as in Peter's snippet.
Hopefully no weird interactions, but it should be easy to try ;-)
HTH
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ems.
It also lets you switch I/O sources and sinks with mounts that are external to
a particular python program being run.
Don't know how factorable all that is in python, but I would think the bulk
would be changes in os and hopefully pretty transparent elsewhere.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ions above. The sources are
all there,
and there is pure python equivalents for the python run-time compiler (which is
(all?) in C I think).
Import compiler and parser etc. and poke around. You'll find interesting things
;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
dy.
>
>The link to the script is http://rafb.net/paste/results/V0y16g97.html.
>
I think if you execfile a script and supply the global dict initialized
to {'__name__':'__main__'} then I think that will satisfy the if __name__ ...
condition
and the whole thing will run as if executed interactively from the command line.
So IWT you could just loop through a list of test modules doing that.
Haven't tried it though. E.g., maybe there are nasty reload problems for
shared modules among different tests?
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
,z=26,k=11)
>>> sd['b':'z']
[2, 11]
>>> sd['b':]
[2, 11, 26]
>>> sd[:'z']
[1, 2, 11]
>>> sd['b':'z']
[2, 11]
>>> sd['b']
2
>>> sorted(sd.items())
[('a', 1), ('b', 2), ('k', 11), ('z', 26)]
>>> sd['x':'k']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
File "", line 8, in __getitem__
KeyError: 'x'
>>> sd['x']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
File "", line 14, in __getitem__
KeyError: 'x'
Hm, None as an actual key might be a little problematical though ;-)
I would think this could be a handy way to get data base records that were
selected
from a range of sorted keys using sql and loading a dict like the above.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:52:14 +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Xavier_D=E9coret?= <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
<...OTT [OT Title] posted text snipped.../>
assignation != assignment ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:30:15 +1000, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:08:10 +, Bengt Richter wrote:
>
[...]
>>
>> The single line replacing
>> """
>> with colour do begin
>> red := 0
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:36:42 +1000, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:08:10 +, Bengt Richter wrote:
>
>>>Using := and = for assignment and equality is precisely as stupid as using
>>>= and == for assignment and equality.
= all_names.split()
Of course, the lines better not have embedded spaces or they'll be split
into several lines. For lines per se, probably I'd do
corenames = """\
rb_basic_islamic
sq1_pentagonTile
sq_arc501Tile
sq_arc503Tile
""".splitlines()
Note the \ to avoid a blank leading line.
>>> """\
... solid
... embedded space
... leading
... trailing
... both
... """.splitlines()
['solid', 'embedded space', ' leading', 'trailing ', ' both ']
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
rolling mode.
Seems to work for cmd.exe on NT4
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
way at much messier approaches
>than that. It's actually os.environ['APPDATA'] ;-)
Hm, which windows is that? Not NT4 ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ichele Simionato may have posted some idea like this early on that
I didn't really follow, but maybe my subconscious snagged and garbled ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 14:17:32 -0400, Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> BTW, there's something about referring to type(self) by its not
>> always dependably bound (though usually global) name that bothers me.
>>
>> I wonder if
On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 12:26:49 -0700, Scott David Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:54:31 -0700, Scott David Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>Or, perhaps:
>>>class foo(object):
ck()
... for i in xrange(10**6): v = None
... t1 = clock()
... for i in xrange(10**6): v = none
... t2 = clock()
... print 't1-t0 = %f, t2=t1 = %f, ratio = %f' %(t1-t0, t2-t1,
(t1-t0)/(t2-t1))
...
>>> test()
t1-t0 = 0.971914, t2=t1 = 0.766901,
object that was), even with a body of pass.
I'm not sure about foo(self, **{'self.x':0, 'self.y':0}), but if
you didn't capture the dict with a **kw formal parameter, IWT you'd
have to be consistent and effect the attribute bindings implied.
(Just a non-thought-out bf here, not too serious ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
o an external time source.
For the latter, Peter, you can probably adapt Paul Rubin' setclock.py
found at
http://www.nightsong.com/phr/python/setclock.py
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 09:11:19 +1000, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:19:05 +, Bengt Richter wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:47:07 +1000, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:07:30 GMT, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>
>> What if parameter name syntax were expanded to allow dotted names as binding
>> targets in the local scope for the argument or default values? E.g.,
>>
>>
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:50:07 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) wrote:
>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:07:30 GMT, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Bengt Richter wrote:
>>
>>
>>class foo(object):
>> x = 1
>> y = 2
>> z = 3
>&g
rected to a file, then stdout redirected to same file. Output
>goes in a file:
>C:\temp>echo hi 2>x.txt 1>&2
>
>C:\temp>type x.txt
>hi
>
>Same as above. Using ^ to avoid special interpretation of the & has no
>effect:
>C:\temp>echo hi 2>x.txt 1>^&
XML,
wouldn't he get code objects? And if so, wouldn't he have to execute them
in a constructed module dict and be careful of normal imports in the "scripts"
etc etc to simulate import? Anyway, it feels like what he wants to do could be
done,
but "the devil is in the details," which are missing ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
he
single main.pyc IWT, assuming at least that one is used. Chasing various forms
of import of
non-builtins recursively to eliminate imports in imported modules before they
are converted to
marshalled form etc., all to avoid real imports, and statically determining
that some imports
don't need to be converted to marshalled string import form because a prior
import can be proved,
should be an interesting exercise, which I can't pursue at this point... ;-)
But I may be reading too much between the lines ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
.
>>> iter(Base())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
TypeError: iteration over non-sequence
>>> iter(Concrete())
>>> list(iter(Concrete()))
[1, 2, 3]
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:51:42 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) writes:
>
>> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 17:57:42 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>I'm trying to implement __iter__ on an abstr
27;] = def(self, args): suite
Personally, I think def(args): suite ought to be allowed as an expression that
you could
put in parentheses like any other expression if you need/want to write it with
multiple lines.
Obviously this could both replace and expand the functionality of lambda ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
method could be nicer once we have Exception as a new-style class.
Just a thought.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 22:04:31 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) writes:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:51:42 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) writes:
>
NB
==
== record hdr ==
EARNINGS VITAL INFORMATION/RENSEIGNEMENTS ESSENTIELS SUR LES GAINS:
==
== record data ==
***
1 [Don't know what [<- 1,34 This is a box of
2 goes in this kind text with top/left
3 of record, but this character row/col 1,34
4 is some text to showand bottom/right at 4,62 ->]
5 how it might get
6 extracted]
==
earnings record right block
[<- 1,34 This is a box of
text with top/left
character row/col 1,34
and bottom/right at 4,62 ->]
HTH
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 18:15:37 -0600, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[The HTML version of this Summary is available at
>http://www.python.org/dev/summary/2005-06-16_2005-06-30.html]
>
Not when I just looked, but maybe it takes a while ;-)
Regards,
Bengt R
,6], 'llrr', ['left', 'left12345', 'right',
>>> '12345right'])
left left1 right12345r
2345 ight
Note that
for i in xrange(len(items)):
item = items[i]
# mess with item
just to walk through items one ite
IMPORTANT* If this happens *at all*, it won't happen until Python
>3.0, which is probably at least 5 years away. And the Python 2.X branch
>will still be available then, so if you don't like Python 3.0, you don't
>have to use it.
>
>STeVe
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:16:17 -0400, Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:29:30 -0600, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>(1) There's no reason to get uncomfortable even if they're remo
om the i-th field,
and strings are immutable, so he can't do
del fields[i][:widths[i]] # slice deletion illegal if fields[i] is a string
and so
fields[i] = fields[i][:widths[i]]
would be the way to go (see my other post).
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 06:17:20 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bengt Richter) wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 21:21:36 -0500, Alex Gittens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I'm trying to define a function that prints fields of given widths
>>with specified alignments; to do so,
(most recent call last):
File "", line 2, in ?
File "", line 1, in ?
ZeroDivisionError: integer division or modulo by zero
orthogonal-musing-ly ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
12 LOAD_FAST1 (item)
15 JUMP_IF_FALSE8 (to 26)
18 POP_TOP
19 LOAD_FAST1 (item)
22 YIELD_VALUE
23 JUMP_ABSOLUTE6
>> 26 POP_TOP
27 JUMP_ABSOLUTE6
>> 30 POP_BLOCK
>> 31 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
34 RETURN_VALUE
A little more info, anyway. HTH.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ill "break" due to storage problems or be fast
enough
will depend on numbers you didn't provide ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 05:35:01 GMT, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> ;-)
>> We have
>
>Have we?
>
>Looks like not a lot of interested takers so far.
>
>But I'll bite. ;-)
>
>
>
>
>> So why not
>>
>
place
like trying to do place = __import__(_AT_AT_MODULE_) wher _AT_AT_MODULE_ gets
defined sort
of like __METACLASS__.), passing the AST and the _AT_AT_deco call location
therein, and the rest
of the parameters.
AST decoration would introduce macro-like capabilities, but restricted to
transfor
cts/mascyma/index.xhtml.de
leading to screenshots at
http://home.arcor.de/mulk/projects/mascyma/screenshots.xhtml.de
No idea what the status of all that is, but looks nice.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e Answer according to Foo is 42
Foo.notTheAnswer is 'ok'
Another Answer according to Foo is 43
AttributeError: setting Foo.TheAnswer to 123 is not allowed
AttributeError: setting Foo.AnotherAnswer to 456 is not allowed
The Answer according to Bar is 42
Bar.notTheAnswer is 'ok'
Another Answer according to Bar is 43
AttributeError: can't set class attribute
AttributeError: can't set class attribute
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:53:22 -0700, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>
>> Then googling for mascsyma [sic ;-)] got
Dang, and I put "[sic]" too. IOW, 'macsyma'.replace('cs','sc')
>
>I doubt it. ;-)
# and adict is global here
adict = {}
setem('k', 'value')
adict -> {'k':'value'}
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ards better questions is not a bad thing.
OTO3H, maybe
I should just silently pass up 20-questions invitations and not pollute this
pleasant space
with perfumes of annoyance (since however diffuse, they are apparently pungent
enough
for some to notice ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:10:36 -0700, Michael Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>...
>>
>> class Foo(object):
>> class __metaclass__(type):
>> def __setattr__(cls, name, value):
>> if type(cls._
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:44:07 -0400, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Bengt Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Me too. I liked the leading _, but on second thought it is a weird
>> language cha
so you wouldn't have to explain it ;-)
I.e., the above would act like
class Foo:
x = Bar()
def method_1(self, _anonymous_arg_1):
x.y = _anonymous_arg_1
and would do whatever it would do now (probably look for a global x or a
closure cell x, but
it wouldn't find the class variable in a normal method call)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
E.g., so we could write
for x in seq if x is not None:
print repr(x), "isn't None ;-)"
instead of
for x in (x for x in seq if x is not None):
print repr(x), "isn't None ;-)"
just a thought.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:12:33 +1000, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> E.g., so we could write
>>
>> for x in seq if x is not None:
>
>Chundrous; looks like that p**l language ...
^--piqued my interest, where'd t
eggs.py
then e.fish('Spam')
would pick it up just like Ham.
>>> spaminst = g.fish('Spam')()
>>> spaminst.fish('__doc__')
'spam.py module doc string'
Note that the fishinghole property dynamically returns the module dict,
which is mutable, so you can write a really tangled mess if you want to.
This already seems dangerously close ;-)
>>> e.fishinghole['x'] = 'x in eggs module globals'
>>> e.fish('x')
'x in eggs module globals'
>>> eggs.x
'x in eggs module globals'
>>> g.fishinghole['x'] = 'x in spam module globals'
>>> g.fish('x')
'x in spam module globals'
>>> eggs.spam.x
'x in spam module globals'
But we didn't directly import spam (eggs did, that's why eggs.spam was visible)
...
>>> spam
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
NameError: name 'spam' is not defined
>>> import spam
>>> spam.x
'x in spam module globals'
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
which changed your trailing 'Or'
So, doing .capitalize on all the pieces from split('_') and then joining them:
>>> def doit(w): return ''.join([s.capitalize() for s in w.split('_')])
...
>>> doit('logical_or')
'LogicalOr'
>>> doit('logical')
'Logical'
>>> doit('logical_or_something')
'LogicalOrSomething'
>>> doit('UP_aNd_down')
'UpAndDown'
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
27;m sure
it can still
be improved upon, and I'm not sure it will be worth your while to dig into it,
unless you
think the problem fun, but there it is.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>there's not already a value to "get". If you have a fancy enough
>editor, you can teach it to replace setdefault by getorset whenever
>you type the former ;-)
But it isn't get OR set, it's
set_default_if_no_value_then_either_way_effectively_get ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
t, then the second, finally the third"
>> >>> chunks = data.rsplit(',', 1)
>> >>> chunks
>> ['the first bit, then the second', ' finally the third']
>> >>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Brian vdB
>>
Or
happy.
>
>I'd even consider writing such a beast in C, albeit more as a learning
>exercise than as a worthwhile measure to speed up some code.
>
>Thanks for any hints.
>
I'd probably subclass file to buffer in good-sized chunks and override the
iteration to go by characters through the buffer, updating the buffer
when you get to its end, and overriding seek and tell to do the right thing
re the buffer and where you are in it for the character iteration via next.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
a
>copy. Grep
>
> http://pyparsing.sourceforge.net/
>
>for "Verilog".
>
or google for
verilog site:sourceforge.net
BTW googling for
verilog site:pyparsing.sourceforge.net
will only get one hit (maybe less if I typoed again ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ex of a canonical twos-complement representation of a negative number,
but I guess I'll let it go with this mention ;-)
BTW, yeah, I know it's not so hard to write
>>> '%010X'% (-75 &0xff)
'B5'
>>> '%010X'% (-75*256**4 &0xff)
'B5'
or a helper or a str subclass that does __mod__ differently but that's not with
the batteries ;-/
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
uldn't locate it off
hand.
It would seem pretty safe and useful though.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
301 - 400 of 974 matches
Mail list logo
