Hi
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos welcome! ;)
"Not supported: index files
On 2012/07/23 02:55 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
Some day, we're going to have programming languages that take advantage
of the full unicode character set. Right now, we're working in ASCII
and creating silly digrams/trigrams like r'' for raw strings (and triple-quotes
for multi-line
strings). Not to
On 2012/07/21 11:49 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
and PS is spelt p.s. :)
Ahem, the absolutely authoritative reference on the subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postscript
says PS or P.S.
--
Regards
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
cn tell itz a fraud - sp 2 gd! lolz
On 2012/08/14 08:34 AM, Simon Cropper wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just had a great idea for a new python module. I haven't bothered
googling it or doing any research.
I need help putting together some code; today preferably, my boss is on
my back. Can someone plea
On 2012/08/16 07:01 AM, Dan Sommers wrote:
When I've got these antlers on I am dictating and when I take them off I
am not dictating.
Very good.
--
Regards
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2012/08/17 12:42 AM, Madison May wrote:
As a lurker, I agree completely with Chris's sentiments.
I too, but I'd prefer something top-posted than have to skip through 38
pages of quoted e-mail to get to a (generally) 1 liner at the bottom.
--
Regards
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
Hi
Sorry guys, I'm "only" able to see this (with the Python versions an end
user can download):
[snip timeit results]
While you have been all doom and gloom and negativity that Python has
"destroyed" Unicode,
I thought that jmf's concerns were solely concerned with the selection
of latin1
On 2012/10/15 03:05 PM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
This actually came as a surprise to me, I assumed that using b'' I could
portably create a byte string (which is true) and using u'' I could
portably create a unicode string (which is not true). This feature would
help porting code between both vers
On 2012/11/16 09:49 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy wrote:
The name "attribute" is not very descriptive. Why not "lazy_attribute" instead?
It just shorter and still descriptive.
Shorter, but not descriptive.
--
Regards
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
