item__ and keys()
With an appropriate ListMixin, providing the first three methods would suffice
to support the full list API.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
Dict_* API calls [1] to manipulate tp_dict, rather than the abstract
PyMapping_* calls [2]. The reason behind using the concrete API is, presumably,
a question of speed :)
Cheers,
Nick.
[1] http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/api/dictObjects.html
[2] http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/api/ma
g the question up on py-dev as well.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Nick Coghlan wrote:
a) Checking that replacing the relevant "raise TypeError" calls in
Lib/Decimal.py with "return NotImplemented" gives you friendlier behaviour.
It turns out this isn't really practical - there's too much code in the module
relying on those TypeErr
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
a) Checking that replacing the relevant "raise TypeError" calls in
Lib/Decimal.py with "return NotImplemented" gives you friendlier
behaviour.
It turns out this isn't really practical - there's too much code in the
modu
Batista, Facundo wrote:
[Nick Coghlan]
#- >> a) Checking that replacing the relevant "raise TypeError"
#- calls in
#- >> Lib/Decimal.py with "return NotImplemented" gives you friendlier
#- >> behaviour.
#- >
#- >
#- > It turns out this isn'
nificantly.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
nload/Descriptor.htm about 4 times
along with your help to get this straight.
If it only takes 2 or 3 re-reads to get descriptors, does that mean Python's
black magic is really only a kind of off-white colour?
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane,
, please consider posting them on SF :)
It's currently conspicuous by its absence:
http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/ref/customization.html
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
they already are (as Duncan pointed out).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
dle this, but I can't".
Maybe "__op__ = NotImplemented" should clear the associated slot. It would also
make it easier to inherit from list and handle slices in __getitem__ by writing
"__getslice__ = NotImplemented" instead of overriding __getslice__ to delegate
t
Blake T. Garretson wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions and modified module. I will probably just
use this "fixed" module to solve my immediate problem.
Expect its performance to be worse than the standard version - it does the right
thing, but it sure ain't pretty. . .
Cheers
eyword gains a native genexp syntax).
If anyone thinks that this would result in a couple of parentheses making too
much difference, consider this:
Py> [x for x in []]
[]
Py> [(x for x in [])]
[]
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan
s clear as adding an asterisk
to the front :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
le):
for item in iterable:
if item is iterable:
# Do the right thing for self-iterative things
# like length 1 strings
yield iterable
raise StopIteration
try:
itr = iter(item):
except TypeError:
yield item
else:
yield x for x in flatten(item)
Steve Holden wrote:
There's always a way:
>>> def test():
... print "hello"
...
>>> var = "test"
>>> eval("%s()" % var)
hello
I'd go with locals() for the simple case of a name lookup:
Py> def test():
... print "
t(x))"
1000 loops, best of 3: 992 usec per loop
For builtin functions, map is usually the fastest option (and, IMO, the most
readable). List comprehensions should be preferred to map + lambda, though.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisba
idea gets adopted, it is unlikely to use the 'with' keyword -
see PEP 3000 for the reason why)
Regards,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
on general lack of *other* punctuation (e.g. the colon would be entirely
ineffective at improving readability if every line ended with a semi-colon).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
rary make use of these (although the
point may have been implied by the references to PyNumeric as the place to look
for more exact documentation. Python's own documentation of the slice() builtins
makes reference to Numeric!).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ce consistent
order matters for a tuple. Comparison semantics are inherited directly from
tuple, and don't care about names (they're only interested in values).
Also, it seems like there has to be a better way to do the "opposite of zip()"
in fromPairs(), but I sure as he
o.some_static_method(some_args)
In Py2.4, the method definition can be collapsed to:
class Demo(object):
@staticmethod
def some_static_method(some_arg_list):
pass
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
isn't accidental that Bastion and rexec got deprecated - the developers just
can't guarantee that the modules are actually providing adequate protection.
A chroot() jail, setuid() to some permission-less sandbox user and your
monitoring daemon are likely to get you a lot further.
Reg
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
if you insist on doing it the other way around,
This paragraph should actually continue ". . .you clearly have too much free
time" };>
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
:
http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/ref/sequence-types.html
Regards,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ions with Python (v2.4)
It sure looks like it's there.
Nick
--
# sigmask || 0.2 || 20030107 || public domain || feed this to a python
print reduce(lambda x,y:x+chr(ord(y)-1),' Ojdl!Wbshjti!=obwAcboefstobudi/psh?')
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
sible for the circularity to a different - possibly new -
module)
If you don't have any circular imports, then I'm out of ideas :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
PEP is aimed at fixing that :)
Cheers,
Nick.
===
PEP: XXX
Title: Executing modules inside packages with '-m'
Version: $Revision:$
Last-Modified: $Date:$
Author: Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-T
to a
proposed feature list for Py3K/3.0.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
can interact with parent classes correctly.
So, in Steven's original code, B.__eq__(A) was invoked, and returned False
(since A was the parent class of B, not a subclass).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ot;it
doesn't work" with no idea which *bit* isn't working)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
def __init__(self, owner):
self._owner = owner
def B1(self):
self._owner.A1()
def A1(self):
pass
def makeB(self):
return A.B(self)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
int sorted(row.items())
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ting, though (this capability would then be available to anyone embedding
Python as a scripting engine).
Cheers,
Nick.
==
>>>import source
>>>class bob:
... def mary():
...pass
... def tim():
...print 'Tim'
...
>>>print bob.
In response to your first message, I offered some ideas on how to get more
useful responses, along with a couple of general techniques for finding the
problem yourself.
Reposting almost exactly the same message 8 or so hours later wasn't a
suggestion featured in either category.
Cheers,
Pekka Niiranen wrote:
However, using
highbits=0x7fff # equals hex(sys.maxint)
gives no errors, but does locking work if
highbits are not exactly 0x?
Try using highbits=-0x7fff as your mask. That should set the MSB without
tripping over the sys.maxint limit.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http
ossibly non-commutative op, and B is a proper subclass
of A
This is so that things like the following work:
.>>> class SillyAdd(long):
__add__ = long.__mul__
__radd__ = __add__
.>>> a = SillyAdd(4)
.>>> a
.4L
.>>> a + 5
.20L
.>>> 5 + a
.20L
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
think your comments were basically on target, though - the idea is to be able
to 'recompile' portions of the interactive session, replacing the code objects
inside the function structure. (or adding entries to class dictionaries, etc, etc)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
up, which happens at run time, not compile
time. This can end up mattering if the lookup is being done inside a loop.
The above idiom gives you a reference directly to the classes you want to use,
thus allowing them to be found directly in the module's own dictionary.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
bjects instead of a list of
digits slows it down. The arithmetic is faster, but the exponentiation +
division required for rounding is significantly slower than the list slicing
that the current implementation is able to use).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ut
I highly recommend learning about the stdlib module "itertools" (I only really
looked into it recently). The above can be done in 3 lines (counting imports):
from itertools import chain
n = [['N', 'F'], ['E'], ['D']]
print [chain(*n)]
Peter Otten wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
from itertools import chain
n = [['N', 'F'], ['E'], ['D']]
print [chain(*n)]
However, [generator] is not the same as list(generator):
Heh - good point. As you say, replacing with list() gives the intended
answer.
Wit
ints.
See the code for the gory details (the relevant function is 'float_int'):
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/python/python/dist/src/Objects/floatobject.c?rev=2.134&view=markup
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisb
module.
2. The 'in dict()' workaround is simple and effective
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
his description, the relevant word is almost certainly
"descriptors")
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
base 10->base 2 conversion.
Indeed. Python's Decimal data type stores the digits in a list for ease of
power
of 10 multiplication & rounding (the precision rules means a *lot* of that goes
on). However, it converts that list of digits to a long integer in order to do
addition, multiplicatio
but i won't be
bothered to download it. :)
It's on the sourceforge download page. So long as you don't want to use
Pythonwin, version 203 should work fine.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
--
ds.
does anyone know how to port this recipe to the new class style?
Override __getattribute__. I don't know why you think it doesn't let you
override all attribute accesses, as that's exactly what it is for.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the user's variables,
easily avoiding namespace conflicts.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
rally, altering the contents of the dicts returned by locals() and globals()
is unreliable at best.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.n
you
like in your own copy of Python .
.>>> _int = int
.>>> def int(*args): return _int(_int(*args))
.>>> from sys import maxint
.>>> int(maxint)
.2147483647
.>>> int(-maxint-1)
.-2147483648
Pretty! };>
Cheers,
Nic
Peter Hansen wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Generally, altering the contents of the dicts returned by locals() and
globals() is unreliable at best.
Nick, could you please comment on why you say this about globals()?
I've never heard of any possibility of "unreliability" in updating
gl
on
any platform:
python -c "import pdb; print pdb.__file__"
The rest of the standard library will be in the same directory as pdb.pyc.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
Bryan wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Bryan wrote:
i'm also curious if it's possible to write this recipe using the new
class style for the Deffered class.it appears you can nolonger
delegate all attributes including special methods to the contained
object by using the __getattr__
from object or another
builtin, that recipe fails.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
itely solve the OP's
problem...
It might be better handled at construction time - if the class supplied to
__new__ is a subclass of the builtin type, swap the __getslice__ implementation
for one which delegates to __getitem__.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e development of extended slicing in the first place (it
wasn't until 2.3 that Python's builtin sequences supported extended slicing at all).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
-
Kent Johnson wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Simon Brunning wrote:
This work -
<http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/52295>?
Only for old-style classes, though. If you inherit from object or
another builtin, that recipe fails.
Could you explain, please? I thought __get
Mike C. Fletcher wrote:
Which is what the patch here:
http://www.vrplumber.com/programming/mstoolkit/
does.
Has that patch been posted to Python's SourceForge patch tracker? I think the
distutils folks will be interested.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Bri
ownside is that the total download to get all the pieces you need is on the
order of 400 MB. . .
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
han just the up time)
There's also info about the 'uptime' utility here:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q232243/
I don't know if that works for XP.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
-
her I nor the win32 gurus can figure out what the
heck happened.
And reinstallation of 2.3 and the Py2.3 win32all didn't fix it? Very
strange. . .
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
was already in beta at the time. So I went with the cookbook recipe instead.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.
#x27;False' are in line for similar treatment (there are
obvious backwards compatibility issues in doing so).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
r
than working on changing the names of special methods.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
pdb and profile for the interpreter you're working
with.
For usability, you can hide all of the above behind a menu item or desktop
shortcut. However, the major target of the feature is Python developers rather
than the end-users of applications built using Python.
Cheers,
Nic
types (e.g. strings, numbers, tuples) are generally returned directly
from functions, rather than returned as 'output parameters'. The ability to
return multiple values easily (via "return a, b, c" & "x, y, z = myfunc()"
generally eliminates the need for
.
Does the python24 source code released?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/python/
Which is linked from www.python.org
However, as Fredrik said, the source tarballs are available on the release page
for 2.4 (and yes, they do contain the source code).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL
nfo to a standard txt file. Probably CSV or
something. Is there any particular way I should be saving this data to file?
Thanks in advance
Nick
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
my suggestion was to make sure that the user can type "bar arg" to start a
Python program called "bar" with the argument "arg". that's trivial, on all
major platforms, despite what Nick says -- and yes, you can start threads
from a progra
value, keys in grouped)
.>>> r
{16: ['mary', 'fred'], 1: ['bar', 'foo'], 42: ['jane'], 7: ['bob']}
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
*
flexible - and in this case, the flexibility eliminates some potential
optimisations (in this case, "I know what this is" compile time name binding).
I believe modifying a module's globals dictionary from outside the module is in
the process of being deprecated - the
age points out (eventually) - this feature is
intended for developers and Python version specific utility scripts like pdb,
profile and pychecker.checker, rather than launch scripts for full applications.
For end users, I agree with you wholeheartedly - applications should behave like
applications
Paul Rubin wrote:
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Until this code:
.>>> import pdb
.>>> pdb.True = 0
.>>> pdb.x = "Darn writeable module dictionaries"
.>>> from pdb import True
.>>> True
0
.>>> from pdb import x
.&g
n" "''.join(chain(*data))"
10 loops, best of 3: 1.2 sec per loop ** OUCH!!
C:\>python -m timeit -s "data = [map(str, range(x)) for x in range(1000)]; from
itertools import chain" "''.join(list(chain(*data)))"
10 loops, best of 3: 107 msec per loop
Yikes - loo
#x27;.join(string_list)
(Python switches to the unicode version automatically if it finds any unicode
strings in the supplied sequence. Jython may not do that - I'm not a Jython user
though, so I'm not sure).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
seful for web tools that strip leading whitespace.
Prepending every line with . is not an ideal solution though... I think
it gets tiresome very quickly.
Aye, can't argue with that. It does have the virtues of reliability and
portability, though :
Nick Coghlan wrote:
(FYI, I filed bug report #1085744 on SF about this)
And Raymond Hettinger was able to decipher my somewhat incoherent rambling (tip:
don't try to write bug reports in the wee hours of the morning) and produce a
potentially useful modification to PySequence_Tuple.
Anyw
(increase the base Python download too much)
- portability (less portable than the core interpreter)
- stability (the numpy folks aren't yet prepared to commit to the backwards
compatibility issues associated with being part of the standard library)
- logistics (merging numpy into Python is like
"EP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (what is the mascot for C++?)
I can't seem to find a goatse link... (But I didn't try very hard.)
Nick
--
# sigmask || 0.2 || 20030107 || public domain || feed this to a python
print reduce(lambda x,y:x+chr(ord(y)-1),&#x
aside from the detail that modifying a module's contents via a reference
to that module is far more evil than playing with globals() ;)
Even if that module is the one you're running in. . .
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Bris
require
calls to methods like int() or str() in your application code to make the types
work out correctly.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skyst
ual Studio license ;)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Why does the following print "0 0" instead of "0 1"? What is the
canonical way to rewrite it in order to get what I obviously expect?
class C(object):
__val = 0
def set_value(self, val):
if val < 0 : self.__val = 0
else : self.__val = val
def get_value(self)
eed to comment).
Or, it could just be a sign that Python 2.4 hasn't been out long enough for
anyone to care what I'm yabbering on about :)
Anyway, all comments are appreciated (even a simple "Sounds good to me").
Cheers,
Nick.
**
;>> x is y
False
.>>> y is z
True
Immutable objects can use optimisation tricks that mutable objects can't rely
on. So, no, a 'mutable tuple' of any description would not be as fast as the
current tuple implementation.
If you want numbers to look at, try some timings c
Martin Bless wrote:
[Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
One thing I stumbled across with the current implementation:
Why doesn't "python -m abc" work with
./abc/
./abc/__init__.py
assuming ./abc/ is directly on the path? In analogy to normal module
import?
It doesn't wor
n certainly *do* the former (using __hash__ and appropriate comparison
overrides), but it isn't particularly easy to do correctly, and hence usually
isn't a great idea unless copies are *really* expensive (and even then, a
shallow copy approach can often suffice).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Co
st)
Py> d[KeyByIdentity(key_with_new_id)]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
KeyError: <__main__.KeyByIdentity object at 0x009DA418>
It would also be trivial to inherit from dict to make an "IdentityDict" which
automatically used KeyByIdentity on it
(NotHashable())
10297264
Py> d = {NotHashable(): "Hi"}
Py> d
{<__main__.NotHashable object at 0x009D1FF0>: 'Hi'}
That may be a bug rather than a feature :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
etween them
3. That function is then passed as an argument to another function call
All of that is contained in the lambda version, too, but the excessive brevity
makes for rather confusing reading.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Although, it looks like new-style classes currently don't apply this
rule - you get the default hash implementation from object no matter what:
That may be a bug rather than a feature :)
And indeed it is:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&a
code
meant to parse out data from my finditer() object.
Take a look at itertools.tee
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.pytho
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Chris Lasher wrote:
Hello,
I really like the finditer() method of the re module. I'm having
difficulty at the moment, however, because finditer() still creates a
callable-iterator oject, even when no match is found. This is
undesirable in cases where I would like to circu
ss
...
Py> for t in sorted(dispatcher.items()): print '%5s: %r'%t
...
a:
b:
c:
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Robert Brewer wrote:
Bengt Richter wrote:
>>> m=type('',(),{})()
>>> m.title = 'not so fast ;-)'
>>> m.title
'not so fast ;-)'
Now THAT is a cool object trick. :)
Heh.
Look ma, Perlython!
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick
;.
They're probably less evil than sys._getframe hacks, though :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
h case, I would also hope to see a __decimal__ special method.
The correct answer would then be for Rational.rational to handle decimals in its
constructor, and provide an implementation of __decimal__ (similar to the way
Decimal.decimal interacts with the other builtin types).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
N
ort x
Py> # Do stuff
Py> import module
Py> reload(module)
Py> from module import x
Py> # We now have the updated version of x
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
ent, it is pulling in the __init__.py from the
current directory, and assigning it to the name you requested)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---
http://boredomandlaziness.skystor
401 - 500 of 1626 matches
Mail list logo
