On Nov 4, 3:30 pm, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Sakkis wrote:
> > Is there any package that parses regular expressions and returns an
> > AST ? Something like:
>
> >>>> parse_rx(r'i (love|hate) h(is|er) (cat|dog)s?\s*!+')
>
On Nov 10, 10:37 am, RyanN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 10, 7:47 am, RyanN wrote:
>
> > Thank you both, I knew there had to be a good way of doing this.
>
> > -Ryan
>
> Just an update. I used dictionaries to hold objects and their names.
> I'm beginning to understand better. Now to apply th
On Nov 10, 4:10 am, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roy Smith wrote:
> > Your
> > choice of containers is not based on any theoretical arguments of what each
> > type was intended to represent, but the cold hard reality of what
> > operations they support.
>
> Right. What seems missi
On Nov 10, 2:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So you could say that 3.0 is forcing us to acknowledge database
>
> > reality ;-)
>
> (Again) huh?
> Reality in databases is that NULL *is* comparable.
> "NULL==something" returns False, it doesn't raise an error.
Given that in SQL "NULL `op` somethi
On Nov 10, 2:23 pm, mark starnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, this is my first post to this group, so please be gentle.
>
> I've written a class which, when I attempt to pickle, gives the error:
>
> *** RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
>
> Is there a way to make pickle d
On Nov 11, 8:02 am, "M.-A. Lemburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-11-11 02:10, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:51:51 +, Duncan Grisby wrote:
>
> >> I have an object database written in Python. It, like Python, is
> >> dynamically typed. It heavily relies on being able
On Nov 12, 1:35 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cristina Yenyxe González García wrote:
>
> > 2008/11/12 Joe Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> So I need functions to assert that a given identifier quacks like a string,
> >> or a number, or a sequence, or a mutable sequence, or a certain
On Nov 12, 4:05 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> greg wrote:
> >> It's not only misleading, it's also a seriously flawed reading of the
> >> original text - the Algol 60 report explicitly talks about assignment
> >> of *values*.
>
> > Do you agree that an expression in Python has a v
On Nov 13, 10:15 am, Joe Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2008, at 7:32 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > While the recipe is great, it can be tiresome to apply all the time. I
> > would factor out the checks into a function, something like this:
>
> > def isstringlike(obj, methods=Non
On Nov 13, 9:22 pm, Joe Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> > This is a pretty bizarre requirement, IMHO. The normal place to keep
> > such information is either class variables or instance variables.
>
> Holy cow, I thought it was just Chris, but there were half a dozen
> similar
On Nov 13, 10:55 pm, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> Take this example:
>
> def foo(alist):
> alist.sort()
> alist.append(5)
>
> The argument can be any object with sort and append methods (assumed to
> act in place). But what happens if you pass it an objec
On Nov 14, 4:49 pm, Joe Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So things like this should suffice:
>
> # simple element
> assert(is_stringlike(foo))
> assert(is_numeric(foo))
> assert(is_like(foo, Duck))
>
> # sequence of elements
> assert(seqof_stringl
On Nov 14, 5:16 pm, BiraRai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for record in roll:
> x = box()
> x.createSomething(record)
> do something
>
> Can anyone tell me why python keeps return the original object x that
> was created in the FOR loop. I want to instantiate a new x object for
> e
On Nov 16, 2:05 am, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:40:04 -0800, Rick Giuly wrote:
>
> >> Hello All,
>
> >> Why is python designed so that b and c (according to code below)
> >> actually share the same list object
On Nov 16, 8:28 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +1. Understanding and accepting the current behavior (mainly because
> > of the extra performance penalty of evaluating the default expressions
> > on every call would incur) is one thing, claiming that it is somehow
> > natural is p
On Nov 16, 7:34 am, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 11:04 pm, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Style_over_substance_fallacy
>
> Quoted Wikipedia -> instant disqualification -> you lose. Good night.
When quoting wikipedia became the new Godwin
On Nov 16, 2:30 pm, "Chris Rebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:02 AM, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 8:28 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> "Less obvious" is entirel
On Nov 17, 12:25 am, "W. eWatson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some repository that says something like for Python 2.5 it works
> with:
>
> Win OSes: W2K, XP, Vista
> numpy vers y, matplotlib vers x. scipy z, etc.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#writewell
--
http://mai
On Nov 17, 12:44 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Nov 17, 8:54 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Candidate to *Longest and Most Boring Thread of the Year* - started
> > more than a month ago, currently discussing "The official definition
> > of call-by-value",
On Nov 19, 8:41 am, Rick Giuly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Python provides, for the most part, an *excellent* user
> interface to the programmer. Why not make it even "better"
> by evaluating the arguments each time the function is called?
> It will be harder to change the language 10 years from
On Nov 19, 10:21 am, Gilles Ganault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2008 14:37:06 + (GMT), Sion Arrowsmith
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Note very carefully that the "else" goes with the "for" and not the "if".
>
> Thanks guys.
And if you end up doing this for several different fun
On Nov 19, 1:53 am, gavino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> python vs smalltalk 80
>
> which is nicer?
Dunno but there's an interesting talk about this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Nov 19, 1:05 pm, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:41:57 -0800 (PST), Rick Giuly
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
>
>
>
> > (By "better" I mean that over many years of time programmers will be
> > more productive because the
On Nov 19, 7:44 pm, r0g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I know you can use eval to dynamically generate the name of a function
> you may want to call. Can it (or some equivalent method) also be used to
> do the same thing for the variables of a class e.g.
>
> class Foo():
> bar = 1
>
On Nov 19, 10:21 pm, tekion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Could some one take a look at the below code snipet which keep
> failing:
>
> import optparse
> p = optparse.OptionParser(description="script to do stuff",
> prog="myscript.py", )
> p.add_option("-c" "--compress", help="0 is noncomp
On Nov 20, 6:40 pm, J Kenneth King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J Kenneth King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
> > I recently encountered some interesting behaviour that looks like a bug
> > to me, but I can't find the appropriate reference to any specifications
> > to clarify whether it is a bug
On Nov 20, 6:58 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Johannes> Seems it was removed on purpose - I'm sure there was a good
> Johannes> reason for that, but may I ask why?
>
> Start here:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg11474.html
>
> Also, a comment to this blog post sug
On Nov 20, 6:54 pm, r0g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would seem from this setattr function that the proper term for these
> is 'attributes'. That for many years I have considered pretty much any
> named thing that may vary a 'variable' might be at the root of the
> problem here as it's a very u
On Nov 21, 10:18 am, Chuck Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any help, pseudo code, or whatever push in the right direction would
> be most appreciated. I am a novice Python programmer but I do have a
> good bit of PHP programming experience.
I'm wondering if PHP experience precludes the abil
On Nov 21, 7:55 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's not easy to define what my point was :-) I try again, but the
> following questions don't cover all the points:
> - What are the dynamic features of Python that you use in your code?
> (excluding ones that can can be done with a good static templ
On Nov 21, 11:05 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Sakkis wrote:
> > On Nov 21, 10:18 am, Chuck Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Any help, pseudo code, or whatever push in the right direction would
> >> be most appreciated. I a
On Nov 21, 2:01 pm, Richard Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Nov 21, 11:05 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> George Sakkis wrote:
> >> > On Nov 21, 10:18 am, Chuck Connors <[EMAIL
On Nov 21, 4:25 pm, Brentt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I know this is a terribly simple question, but the docs seem to be
> designed for people who probably find a the answer to this question
> terribly obvious. But its not at all obvious to me.
Don't worry, it's not obvious to *anyone* new
On Nov 21, 4:46 pm, harijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I am a few months new into python. I have used regexps before in perl
> and java but am a little confused with this problem.
>
> I want to parse a number of strings and extract only those that
> contain a 4 digit number anywhere inside
On Nov 21, 5:11 pm, Joe Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a function that takes a reference to a class, and then
> instantiates that class (and then does several other things with the
> new instance). This is easy enough:
>
> item = cls(self, **itemArgs)
>
> where "cls" is the cla
Is there a way to turn off (either globally or explicitly per
instance) the automatic interning optimization that happens for small
integers and strings (and perhaps other types) ? I tried several
workarounds but nothing worked:
>>> 'x' is 'x'
True
>>> 'x' is 'x'+''
True
>>> 'x' is ''+'x'
True
>>>
On Mar 18, 1:30 pm, Kottiyath wrote:
> When we say readability counts over complexity, how do we define what
> level of complexity is ok?
> For example:
> Say I have dict a = {'a': 2, 'c': 4, 'b': 3}
> I want to increment the values by 1 for all keys in the dictionary.
> So, should we do:>>> for
On Mar 18, 2:13 pm, "R. David Murray" wrote:
> George Sakkis wrote:
> > Is there a way to turn off (either globally or explicitly per
> > instance) the automatic interning optimization that happens for small
> > integers and strings (and perhaps other types) ? I tr
On Mar 18, 4:06 pm, Daniel Fetchinson
wrote:
> > I'm working on some graph generation problem where the node identity
> > is significant (e.g. "if node1 is node2: # do something) but ideally I
> > wouldn't want to impose any constraint on what a node is (i.e. require
> > a base Node class). It's
On Mar 18, 4:50 pm, "andrew cooke" wrote:
> this is completely normal (i do exactly this all the time), BUT you should
> use "==", not "is".
Typically, but not always; for example check out the identity map [1]
pattern used in SQLAlchemy [2].
George
[1] http://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/ide
On Mar 7, 8:47 pm, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> The existing groupby() itertool works great when every element in a
> group has the same key, but it is not so handy when groups are
> determined by boundary conditions.
>
> For edge-triggered events, we need to convert a boundary-event
> predicate to
On Apr 2, 8:32 am, Neal Becker wrote:
> How do I interleave 2 sequences into a single sequence?
>
> How do I interleave N sequences into a single sequence?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=python+interleave+sequences
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/511480/
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/528936/
HT
On Apr 3, 9:56 pm, Jon Clements wrote:
> On 4 Apr, 02:14, bwgoudey wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have a lot of if/elif cases based on regular expressions that I'm using to
> > filter stdin and using print to stdout. Often I want to print something
> > matched within the regular expression and the moment I'v
On Apr 3, 3:47 pm, barisa wrote:
> On Apr 3, 8:58 pm, nrball...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 3, 12:33 pm, barisa wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 3, 11:39 am, "Hendrik van Rooyen" wrote:
>
> > > > "Matteo" wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 3, 9:05 am, Linuxwell wrote:
>
> > > > >> Starting today I would like
On Apr 6, 10:53 am, Reckoner wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have the following problem: I have two objects, say, A and B, which
> are both legitimate stand-alone objects with lives of their own.
>
> A contains B as a property, so I often do
>
> A.B.foo()
>
> the problem is that some functions inside of B actu
That's more of a general API design question but I'd like to get an
idea if and how things are different in Python context. AFAIK it's
generally considered bad form (or worse) for functions/methods to
return values of different "type" depending on the number, type and/or
values of the passed parame
On Apr 6, 5:56 pm, MRAB wrote:
> In your example I would possibly suggest returning a 'Result' object and
> then later subclassing to give 'ConfidenceResult' which has the
> additional 'confidence' attribute.
That's indeed one option, but not very appealing if `Result` happens
to be a builtin (e
On Apr 6, 7:57 pm, "andrew cooke" wrote:
> andrew cooke wrote:
> > George Sakkis wrote:
> >> That's more of a general API design question but I'd like to get an
> >> idea if and how things are different in Python context. AFAIK it's
> &g
On Apr 7, 3:18 pm, Adam Olsen wrote:
> On Apr 6, 3:02 pm, George Sakkis wrote:
>
> > For example, it is common for a function f(x) to expect x to be simply
> > iterable, without caring of its exact type. Is it ok though for f to
> > return a list for some types/values
On Apr 11, 3:03 pm, Mike H wrote:
> Can I not use the cursor.execute command to pass variables that aren't
> immediately next to each other? If so, is there a better way to go
> about solving this problem?
Yes, there is. Use one of the several production quality python SQL
toolkits built for exa
nection)
>>> result = conn.execute(ins)
HTH,
George
[1] http://www.sqlalchemy.org/
[2] http://www.sqlobject.org/
[3] https://storm.canonical.com/
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM, George Sakkis
> wrote:
> > On Apr 11, 3:03 pm, Mike H wrote:
>
> >> Can I not use t
On Apr 11, 4:14 pm, ergconce...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a list looking like
>
> [ 0.84971586, 0.05786009, 0.9645675, 0.84971586, 0.05786009,
> 0.9645675, 0.84971586, 0.05786009, 0.9645675, 0.84971586,
> 0.05786009, 0.9645675]
>
> and I would like to break this list into subsets
On Apr 11, 6:05 pm, ergconce...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Apr 11, 11:18 pm, George Sakkis wrote:
>
>
>
> > The numpy import *is* important if you want to use numpy-specific
> > features; there are many "tricks" you can do easily with numpy arrays
> >
On Apr 17, 9:22 pm, Pavel Panchekha wrote:
> I've got an object which has a method, __nonzero__
> The problem is, that method is attached to that object not that class
>
> > a = GeneralTypeOfObject()
> > a.__nonzero__ = lambda: False
> > a.__nonzero__()
>
> False
>
> But:
>
> > bool(a)
>
> True
>
On Apr 19, 6:01 pm, "Martin P. Hellwig"
> Besides, calling Python Object-Orientated is a bit of an insult :-). I
> would say that Python is Ego-Orientated, it allows me to do what I want.
+1 QOTW
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 26, 11:08 pm, John Doe wrote:
> Having trouble tabifying a section of Python code.
> Code -- Tabify Region
> Does it work for anyone else?
Yes it does, you have to select a region before (e.g. ctrl+A for the
whole file). Regardless, the common standard indentation is 4 spaces;
avoid tabs
On May 6, 10:32 pm, Luis Alberto Zarrabeitia Gomez
wrote:
> A bit offtopic: a while ago I think I saw a recipe for a decorator that, via
> bytecode hacks, would bind otherwise global names to the local namespace of
> the
> function. Can anyone remember it/point me to it?
Maybe you saw http://co
On May 8, 11:33 am, Mikael Olofsson wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have long tried to avoid decorators, but now I find myself in a
> situation where I think they can help. I seem to be able to decorate
> functions, but I fail miserably when trying to decorate methods. The
> information I have been able t
On May 12, 12:49 pm, Mensanator wrote:
> On May 12, 8:27 am, rump...@web.de wrote:
>
> > > > > The language and library are missing arbitrary precision integer
> > > > > arithmetic, using GMP or something like that.
>
> > > > True, but currently not a high priority for me.
>
> > > Too bad. That ma
On May 14, 3:55 pm, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
> In article <4a0c6e42$0$12031$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
> >Marco Mariani a écrit :
> >> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
> >>> Oh, you meant the "return type" ? Nope, no way. It just doesn't make
> >>> sense given Py
On May 18, 5:27 am, jer...@martinfamily.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
> My suggestion is primarily about using multiple threads and sharing
> memory - something akin to the OpenMP directives that one of you has
> mentioned. To do this efficiently would involve removing the Global
> Interpreter Lock, or s
On May 21, 5:55 pm, shailesh wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be a predicate returning method wrappers. Is
> there an alternate way to query an object for attributes that are of
> method wrappers?
Sure:
>>> MethodWrapper = type({}.__init__)
>>> isinstance([].__len__, MethodWrapper)
True
But you'r
On May 26, 2:39 pm, Sumitava Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi all,
> I need to randomly sample from a list where all choices have weights
> attached to them. The probability of them being choosen is dependent
> on the weights.
> If say Sample list of choices are [A,B,C,D,E] and weights of the same
> are [0.8
On May 12, 7:35 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ohad Frand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | I am looking for a way to programmically get a list of all python
> | existing statements that I cannot access by __builtins__ or locals()
> | (like ["asse
On May 12, 7:03 pm, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IMHO, whether a varibale is used or not has got to be one of the least
> > important things of all (in no small part because it's easily
> > discernable from nearby code).
>
> I couldn't disagree
On May 12, 11:02 pm, Jimmy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 13, 10:36 am, "Dan Upton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Jimmy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, i know it may be a little non-python thing, however, I can think
> > > of no place better to
On May 13, 6:18 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Tue, 13 May 2008 06:34:03 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > Is that true that this comparison operators are gone in Python 3.0:
>
> > < (is less than)
> >> (is greater than)
> > <= (is less than or equals)
> >> =
On May 13, 9:46 am, Sanoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any programming that helps you solve a problem is fun and
> recreational. At least, that's how I look at it. I suppose it really
> depends on why you're doing it, what your objective is, etc. But I'd
> say, why not?
You must be new here. It
On May 14, 10:19 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > An instance method works on the instance
> > A Static method is basically a function nested within a class object
> > A class method is overkill?
>
> If anything, a static method is overkill. See it this way: *if* you for some
I spent several hours debugging some bogus data results that turned
out to be caused by the fact that heapq.nlargest doesn't respect rich
comparisons:
import heapq
import random
class X(object):
def __init__(self, x): self.x=x
def __repr__(self): return 'X(%s)' % self.
On May 14, 4:38 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 mai, 16:30, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On May 14, 10:19 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > An instance me
On May 15, 3:06 am, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Sakkis wrote:
> > I spent several hours debugging some bogus data results that turned
> > out to be caused by the fact that heapq.nlargest doesn't respect rich
> > comparisons:
>
> &g
On May 15, 8:27 am, globalrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have a big collection of .txt files that i want to open and parse to
> extract information.
>
> is there a library for this or maybe even built in?
This has a lot to do with how well-structured are your files and what
kind of information
On May 16, 11:58 am, "inhahe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not an expert in this but what does it mean to emphasize state? It
> seems the opposite of that would be a) functional programming, and b)
> passing parameters instead of using global or relatively local variables.
> And maybe c) corou
On May 16, 5:22 pm, "Dan Upton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This might be more information than necessary, but it's the best way I
> can think of to describe the question without being too vague.
>
> The task:
>
> I have a list of processes (well, strings to execute said processes)
> and I want to
On May 16, 5:02 pm, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Sorry for the repost, didnt' quite finish
>
> > Suppose I have a function in module X that calls eval e.g,
>
> > X.py
> > ___
> > Def foo(bar):
> > Eval(bar)
> > ___
>
> > Now eval will b
I have a simple DB table that stores md5 signature pairs:
Table "public.duplicate"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--+---+---
sig | bytea | not null
orig_sig | bytea | not null
Indexes:
"duplicate_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (sig)
"ix_duplicate_orig_sig" btree (ori
On May 21, 6:32 pm, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a simple DB table that stores md5 signature pairs:
>
>Table "public.duplicate"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> --+---+---
> sig | bytea | not null
>
On May 23, 6:59 pm, Johannes Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> I'm just starting with Python and am extremely unexperienced with it so
> far. Having a strong C/C++ background, I wish to do something like
>
> if (q = getchar()) {
> printf("%d\n", q);
>
> }
>
> or translated
On May 27, 3:43 am, Paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 27, 7:42 am, "inhahe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, I just need it once in a while. Actually now is the only time I
> > remember. The last time what I needed was a file name extension. I want a
> > string called headers, but
On May 28, 5:19 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kind of like how this year's program won't work on next year's
> > Python?
>
> For somebody who has admitted to have only very rudimentary knowledge of
> python that's a pretty bold statement, don't you think?
>
> > Except Flam
On May 28, 4:39 pm, Aaron Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to change the content of a function after the function
> has been created? For instance, say I make a class:
>
> class MyClass:
> def ClassFunction(self):
> return 1
>
> And I
On May 30, 10:16 pm, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 30, 6:21 pm, HYRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can I write a decorator that it can automately do this conversion
>
> > def func1()
> > a = 1
>
> > --->
>
> > def func1():
> > a = 1
> > return locals()
>
> Not
On May 31, 4:19 am, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was reading this http://www.paulgraham.com/icad.html";>Paul
> > Graham article and he builds an accumuator generator function in
> > the appendix. His looks like this:
>
> >
> > def foo(n):
Equivalence is a class that can be used to maintain a partition of
objects into equivalence sets, making sure that the equivalence
properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity) are preserved. Two
objects x and y are considered equivalent either implicitly (through a
key function) or explicitly b
On May 31, 8:01 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://codepad.org/MV3k10AU
>
> I want to write like next one.
>
> def conjunction(number=a[1],name=b[1],size=c[1]):
> flag = a[0]==b[0]==c[0]
> if flag:
> for e in zip(number,name,size):
> print e
>
> conjunction(a,b,c)
>
> -
On Jun 1, 3:55 pm, Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tried and tried...
>
> I'd like to read in a binary file, convert it's 4 byte values into
> floats, and then save as a .txt file.
>
> This works from the command line (import struct);
>
> In [1]: f = open("test2.pc0", "rb")
> In [
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Giuseppe Ottaviano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2008, at 6:16 PM, George Sakkis wrote:
>
>> Equivalence is a class that can be used to maintain a partition of
>> objects into equivalence sets, making sure that the equivalence
On Jun 2, 7:53 pm, "Filip Gruszczyński" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I am student of CS at the University of Warsaw, currently 4th year. I
> am attending Object Oriented Programming seminar and it is about time,
> I started looking for an idea of my master's degree project. As I l
On Jun 3, 1:42 am, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 2, 10:23 pm, alex23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Then again, I have no issue with the current convention and personally
> > find the idea of adding a "private" keyword makes as much sense as
> > being able to syntactically define
On Jun 3, 6:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have come across this issue in Python and I cannot quite understand
> what is going on.
>
> class Param():
> def __init__(self, data={}, condition=False):
> if condition:
> data['class']="Advanced"
> pri
Equivalence v0.2 has been released. Also the project is now hosted at
http://code.google.com/p/pyquivalence/ (the name 'equivalence' was
already taken but the module is still called equivalence).
Changes
===
- The internals were largely rewritten, but the API remained
effectively intact.
- A n
On Jun 5, 9:26 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 1:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > Do you mean something like this? (notice the many formatting
> > differences, use a formatting similar to this one in your code)
>
> > coords = []
>
> >
On Jun 5, 11:21 am, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 июн, 18:56, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 5 июн, 18:19, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 5, 3:49 pm, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > On 5 ÉÀÎ, 01:57,
On Jun 5, 11:48 am, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 июн, 19:38, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 11:21 am, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On 5 июн, 18:56, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PR
On Jun 5, 2:07 pm, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "private" keyword goes further and prevents
> access even by derived classes. The double leading underscore in
> Python does no such thing.
Who develops these derived classes ? A competitor ? A malicious
hacker ? A spammer ? Who are yo
On Jun 9, 1:48 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am currently planning to write my own web crawler. I know Python but
> not Perl, and I am interested in knowing which of these two are a
> better choice given the following scenario:
>
> 1) I/O issues: my biggest constraint in terms of reso
I'm baffled with a situation that involves:
1) an instance of some class that defines __del__,
2) a thread which is created, started and referenced by that instance,
and
3) a weakref proxy to the instance that is passed to the thread
instead of 'self', to prevent a cyclic reference.
This probably
I'd like some feedback on a solution to a variant of the producer-
consumer problem. My first few attempts turned out to deadlock
occasionally; this one seems to be deadlock-free so far but I can't
tell if it's provably correct, and if so, whether it can be
simplified.
The generic producer-consume
On Jun 10, 11:47 pm, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had a little trouble understanding what exact problem it is that you are
> trying to solve but I'm pretty sure that you can do it with one of two
> methods:
Ok, let me try again with a different example: I want to do what can
be ea
901 - 1000 of 1186 matches
Mail list logo
