On Nov 10, 10:37 am, RyanN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 10, 7:47 am, RyanN wrote: > > > Thank you both, I knew there had to be a good way of doing this. > > > -Ryan > > Just an update. I used dictionaries to hold objects and their names. > I'm beginning to understand better. Now to apply this to my actual > problem. Here's the code I ended up with:
That's fine, but unless you add functionality that *does* actually something with all these data, there's not much value going with an OO approach compared to using plain old data structures (e.g. [default]dicts and [named]tuples). George -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
