In PEP 594 t has been proposed that cgi & cgitb should be removed. I suspect I am not the only person in the world that likes
using cgi and cgitb.
One of the nice features in cgitb is the ability to get a nice traceback with variable values etc etc etc. I have used the
underlying mechanism to p
Hi..
I am Shirsendu. I encountered a problem while installing python 3.7
in my windows 7 ultimate p.c(32 bit) . It is showing an unspecified error
of 0x80072ee7 when i am trying to initialize it in my pc. Please help me.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Our program work group (WG) has been working hard over the weekend to
select the sessions for EuroPython 2019.
* https://ep2019.europython.eu/events/sessions/ *
We’re now happy to announce the first batch with:
- 112 talks,
- 12 trainings,
- 6 posters,
- 1 interactive session and
- 5 h
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 02:45, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> On 5/21/2019 9:11 PM, CrazyVideoGamez wrote:
> > I tried doing a list comprehension. I typed:
> >
> > favorite_fruits = ['watermelon', 'blackberries']
> > print(fruit for fruit in favorite_fruits)
> >
> > And I got:
> > at 0x0402C7B0>
> > What
Short answer: (some generator expression) is for iterating over, as others
have said. try this:
print([fruit for fruit in favorite_fruits])
a loop would work too, as someone mentioned, but the result would be
different. you'd get your fruits separated by line breaks (or something
else if you speci
On 5/22/19, Sirso Bhatto wrote:
>
>I am Shirsendu. I encountered a problem while installing python 3.7
> in my windows 7 ultimate p.c(32 bit) . It is showing an unspecified error
> of 0x80072ee7 when i am trying to initialize it in my pc. Please help me.
A status code with only the high b
On 22/05/2019 08:51, Robin Becker wrote:
In PEP 594 t has been proposed that cgi & cgitb should be removed. I
suspect I am not the only person in the world that likes using cgi and
cgitb.
Can I second this? I just started writing a small CGI application in
Python, and if cgi and cgitb were g
Re cgitb, not sure if this is what you want, but I just came across this
this week: https://github.com/cknd/stackprinter
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:52 AM Robin Becker wrote:
> In PEP 594 t has been proposed that cgi & cgitb should be removed. I
> suspect I am not the only person in the world tha
On 2019-05-22 08:51, Robin Becker wrote:
> In PEP 594 t has been proposed that cgi & cgitb should be removed.
> I suspect I am not the only person in the world that likes using
> cgi and cgitb.
/me waves from the the back row as another cgi/cgitb user...
-tkc
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman
On 5/22/2019 3:51 AM, Robin Becker wrote:
In PEP 594 t has been proposed that cgi & cgitb should be removed. I
suspect I am not the only person in the world that likes using cgi and
cgitb.
I suspect that there will be at least one person objecting to each
removal. But the underlying issue, a
Robin Becker writes:
> In PEP 594 t has been proposed that cgi & cgitb should be removed. I
> suspect I am not the only person in the world that likes using cgi and
> cgitb.
Currently, "Zope" is using "cgi"; it uses "zExceptions" (--> PyPI)
for tracebacks.
Should "cgi" disappear from the standar
11 matches
Mail list logo
