Hi,
On Friday, 29 April 2016, Igor Korot wrote:
> Andrea,
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Andrea Gavana > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On Friday, 29 April 2016, Igor Korot >
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Andrea,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:45 PM, > wrote:
> >> > Dear list,
> >> >
> >> > I
Rustom Mody writes:
> At that point what I gleaned was that original makeinfo was in C
> New one was rewritten in perl.
The previous one was definitely written in C and I've looked at the code
some. I hadn't known there was a new one. The C one was actually the
second one. The first one was wr
"Fetchinson ." wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I have a very specific set of requirements for a task and was
>wondering if anyone had good suggestions for the best set of tools:
>
>* store text documents (about 10 pages)
>* the data set is static (i.e. only lookups are performed, no delete,
>no edit, no
The Program work group is happy to announce that there will be an
extra Call for Proposals early in June. This call is limited to hot
topics and most recent developments in software and technology.
Why is there a second call ?
Planning a big conference is a challenge:
On Friday, 29 April 2016 22:40:10 UTC+2, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Since you're asking on this list, I'll assume you're using Beautiful
> Soup and/or youtube-dl. You'll need to go into more detail about what
> you're trying to do, and where the Python problem is.
>
> ChrisA
The situation is very s
On 4/29/2016 11:43 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
The official documentation is accurate.
That may be true on a technical level. But the identically worded text
in the documentation implies otherwise. Maybe I'm nitpicking this. Even
if I submitted a bug to request a clearer explanation in the
doc
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Christopher Reimer
wrote:
> On 4/29/2016 11:43 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>
>> The official documentation is accurate.
>
>
> That may be true on a technical level. But the identically worded text in
> the documentation implies otherwise. Maybe I'm nitpicking this. E
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016, at 09:48 AM, Christopher Reimer wrote:
> On 4/29/2016 11:43 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> > The official documentation is accurate.
>
> That may be true on a technical level. But the identically worded text
> in the documentation implies otherwise.
That's the thing -- no it
On 4/30/16, Gordon Levi wrote:
> "Fetchinson ." wrote:
>
>>Hi folks,
>>
>>I have a very specific set of requirements for a task and was
>>wondering if anyone had good suggestions for the best set of tools:
>>
>>* store text documents (about 10 pages)
>>* the data set is static (i.e. only look
On 4/30/2016 10:11 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
You're thinking of the whole "string", but you're operating on
single-character substrings, and when " ".islower() is run, its false.
Because the two-pronged test, a) if all cased characters are lowercase
and b) there is at least one cased character.
Hello everyone,
Thanks very much for all your replies and sorry for the inconvience.
This is my first time to post question in this list.
I am using python 2.7 in Windows 7 Enterprise version.
Here is the the filename that cause the problem: "Decock-2013-On the
potential of δ18O and δ15N.pdf"
Wh
On 4/30/2016 2:13 PM, Jianling Fan wrote:
I am using python 2.7 in Windows 7 Enterprise version.
Here is the the filename that cause the problem: "Decock-2013-On the
potential of δ18O and δ15N.pdf"
When I delete the "δ" in the filename, the script works good.
You may be able to get "δ" (and o
On 2016-04-30 19:13, Jianling Fan wrote:
Hello everyone,
Thanks very much for all your replies and sorry for the inconvience.
This is my first time to post question in this list.
I am using python 2.7 in Windows 7 Enterprise version.
Here is the the filename that cause the problem: "Decock-201
Oh, it works!
This is the simplest and best way!
Thanks very much!
On 30 April 2016 at 13:42, MRAB wrote:
> On 2016-04-30 19:13, Jianling Fan wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Thanks very much for all your replies and sorry for the inconvience.
>> This is my first time to post question in th
I am trying to use apply to execute a lookup function, so that we can put
abbreviation in a new column, in accordance to a state name in another column.
Does anyone knows how to make this to work?
Regards.
David
state_to_code = {"VERMONT": "VT", "GEORGIA": "GA", "IOWA": "IA", "Armed Forces
Pacifi
could you post in plaintext as its really hard to figure out what your
code is doing
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:40 PM, David Shi via Python-list
wrote:
> I am trying to use apply to execute a lookup function, so that we can put
> abbreviation in a new column, in accordance to a state name in anot
1) Your code seems to be missing a lot.
2) it's better to post a small sample of the dictionary rather than the
whole thing.
3) remove the comments that don't seem to say anything useful.
4) tell us what problems you are having
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 30Apr2016 13:23, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:49 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
Random832 writes:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016, at 22:27, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Instead it does some ½-assed fall-between-the-stools of both
That doesn't answer the question of why, if you (Well, Ethan, but
you
On 29Apr2016 11:40, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:08 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2016-04-28, Random832 wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 15:39, Grant Edwards wrote:
That's fine. If you want two or three forms of documentation then you
prepare two or three forms of documentatio
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016, at 19:51, c...@zip.com.au wrote:
> _When_ they want a pager.
Why would they need an environment variable at all in that case, rather
than explicitly invoking the pager by name?
To me, *not* having PAGER=cat signifies that someone *does* want a
pager. That may be a crappy con
On 2016-05-01, Random832 wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016, at 19:51, c...@zip.com.au wrote:
>> _When_ they want a pager.
>
> Why would they need an environment variable at all in that case, rather
> than explicitly invoking the pager by name?
We don't want to use a PAGER variable to specify when we
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016, at 22:30, Grant Edwards wrote:
> We don't want to use a PAGER variable to specify when we want a pager
> and when we don't want a pager. If we want a pager we append "| less"
> to the command. If we don't want a pager, we don't append that to the
> command.
Setting PAGER=ca
On Sun, 1 May 2016 09:51 am, c...@zip.com.au wrote:
> Let me recite one of my favourite rules of thumb:
>
> If it can't be turned off, it's not a feature. - Karl Heuer
My microwave oven has a safety lock which prevents the mechanism from
operating (generating microwaves) while the door is open.
On 30Apr2016 23:46, Random832 wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016, at 22:30, Grant Edwards wrote:
We don't want to use a PAGER variable to specify when we want a pager
and when we don't want a pager. If we want a pager we append "| less"
to the command. If we don't want a pager, we don't append that
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> Yes, PAGER=cat would make "man" also not page, and likely almost everything.
> And yet I am unwilling to do so. Why?
>
> On reflection, my personal problems with this approach are twofold:
>
> - I want $PAGER to specify my preferred pager when I do want a
25 matches
Mail list logo