On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-05-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>> # Wrong, don't do this!
>>> x = 0.1
>>> while x != 17.3:
>>> print(x)
>>> x += 0.1
>>
>> Actually, I wouldn't do that with integers
python help,
I've tried this code which I got from:
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/python/python_sending_email.htm
I build this file and run it
---//---
#!/usr/bin/python
import smtplib
sender = "inq1...@inqvista.com"
receivers = ["webmas...@inqvista.com"]
message = """From: jol
To: webmaste
Consider this quick session (Python 2.7 using the tip of the 2.7
branch in Mercurial):
% python2.7
Python 2.7.5+ (2.7:93eb15779050, May 30 2013, 15:27:39)
[GCC 4.4.6 [TWW]] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import traceback
>>>
>>> import StringIO
> From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
> Subject: Re: Short-circuit Logic
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 05:42:17 +
> To: python-list@python.org
[...]
> Here's another way, mathematically equivalent (although not necessarily
> equivalent using floating p
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> I don't object to changing the join method (one of the more
>>> shoe-horned string methods) back into a function, but to my eyes
>>
> From: nob...@nowhere.org
> Subject: Python toplevel in a Web page
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:20:18 +0200
> To: python-list@python.org
>
> Hello,
> I wonder if I can find some source code example
> of a Python 3 toplevel box in a Web page.
> Something simp
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 16:40:52 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 31 May 2013 01:56:09 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>>> You're assuming you can casually hit Ctrl-C to stop an infinite loop,
>>> meaning that it's trivial. It's not. N
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:36:54 AM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
> I don't object to changing the join method (one of the more
> shoe-horned string methods) back into a function, but to my eyes
> you've got the arguments backward. It should be:
>
> def join(sep, iterable): return sep.join(iterable)
>
>
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:48 AM, inq1ltd wrote:
> python help,
>
> I've tried this code which I got from:
>
> http://www.tutorialspoint.com/python/python_sending_email.htm
>
> I build this file and run it
>
> After running the the file and I get
>
> "Successfully sent email"
>
> My question is why
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 3:19:42 PM UTC-7, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 29May2013 13:14, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> | On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:33 PM, alcyon wrote:
>
> | > This notation displays hex values except when they are 'printable', in
> which case it displays that printable character. Ho
Hi Matthew! I'm on a similar quest!
I'm still learning the basics of Python so I may not be a good source of
information.
I'm reading a lot of stuff about how to use Python for the parallelization of
code and data and found BSP[1] to be very interesting and perhaps worth the
time to learn it!
On 30May2013 15:48, inq1ltd wrote:
| python help,
Please do not make new discussions by replying to an old discussion.
It is not enough to change the subject line; unless you also remove
any References: and In-Reply-To: header lines your message is still
considered part of the old discussion.
|
On Thu, 30 May 2013 12:07:40 +0300, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> I suppose this depends on the complexity of the process and the amount
> of data that produced the numbers of interest. Many individual
> floating point operations are required to be within an ulp or two of
> the mathematically correct
On 30May2013 15:46, Skip Montanaro wrote:
| Consider this quick session (Python 2.7 using the tip of the 2.7
| branch in Mercurial):
|
| % python2.7
| Python 2.7.5+ (2.7:93eb15779050, May 30 2013, 15:27:39)
| [GCC 4.4.6 [TWW]] on linux2
[...]
| >>> import io
| >>> s2 = io.StringIO()
[...]
| Fil
io.StringIO only accepts Unicode input (i.e. u"multibyte string"),
while StringIO.StringIO accepts either 8 bit input or unicode input.
As you can see in the following excerpt from your traceback, the
'print_list' function creates an 8-bit string, which is then
(probably) passed to 'file.write' as
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 7:24:48 PM UTC-5, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> About the only thing I don't like is:
>
> var = 1,
>
> That binds var to a tuple (singleton) value, instead of 1.
I don't understand why Python needs tuples anyway; at least not tuple
literals!. I mean, i like the idea of a
On 05/30/2013 12:18 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> In some ways, Python is a more pure OOP language than Java: everything in
> Python is an object, including classes themselves.
>
> In other ways, Python is a less pure and more practical language. You
> don't have to wrap every piece of functional
On 30May2013 17:54, Wolfgang Maier
wrote:
| Antoine Pitrou wrote:
| >The Linux version of "man posix_fadvise" probably holds the answer:
[...]
|
| Hi Antoine,
| you're right and thanks a lot for this great piece of information.
[...]
| P.S.: Maybe these new os module features could use a bit mor
>
> I would expect io.StringIO to be a match for the io.* stuff in Python
> 3. So it should care whether it is a binary stream or a text stream.
> Whereas StringIO.StringIO is your good old Python 2 StringIO, which expects
> strs.
>
> On that basis, io.StringIO is a text stream, expecting Unicode
>
> To: python-list@python.org
> From: wlfr...@ix.netcom.com
> Subject: Re: Short-circuit Logic
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 19:38:31 -0400
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 08:48:59 -0400, Roy Smith declaimed
> the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
>
>>
>> Analysis
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:58 AM, rusi wrote:
> > On May 30, 5:58 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > > The alternative would be an infinite number of iterations, which is far
> > > far worse.
> >
> > There was one heavyweight among programming teachers -- E.W. Dijkstra
> > -- who had some rather extre
On Thu, 30 May 2013 19:38:31 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> Measuring 1 foot from the 1000 foot stake leaves you with any error
> from datum to the 1000 foot, plus any error from the 1000 foot, PLUS any
> azimuth error which would contribute to shortening the datum distance.
First, let's
In article ,
Nobody wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 19:38:31 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
> > Measuring 1 foot from the 1000 foot stake leaves you with any error
> > from datum to the 1000 foot, plus any error from the 1000 foot, PLUS any
> > azimuth error which would contribute to shorte
Hello Python developers
I have learnt python and used it for various purposes for scietific
computing using sage and GUI development using Tkinter and lots more. I
want to start web development using python My goal is to learn the web
development in python from the basic level and understand the b
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> What if you need to perform operations on a sequence (more than once) in a
> non-linear fashion? What if you need to modify the sequence whilst looping?
> In many cases your simplistic "for loop" will fail miserably.
What has this to do w
On May 31, 12:36 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> But even if only a minority of programmers can master languages like
> Lisp, Haskell, or Scheme, doesn't mean that *all* programmers can't learn
> something from them. Functional programming is at least 50% a philosophy:
>
> * pass arguments to funct
Steven D'Aprano於 2013年5月30日星期四UTC+8上午10時28分57秒寫道：
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:50:47 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:33 AM, rusi wrote:
>
> >> 0.0 == 0.0 implies 5.4 == 5.4
>
> >> is not a true statement is what (I think) Steven is saying. 0 (or if
>
> >> you prefer 0
On 05/30/2013 07:10 PM, Nobody wrote:
> This is why technical drawings which include regularly-spaced features
> will normally specify the positions of features relative to their
> neighbours instead of (or as well as) relative to some origin.
If I am planting trees, putting in fence posts, or dri
Got It!!!, Finally. Thanks Dave
So, the control goes back to the place after the recursive function is called
once the no. of element is equal to one and starts merging after which it will
again start to split the remaining items.
Thank you Chris for your multiple explanations. It was also ve
Got It!!!, Finally. Thanks Dave
So, the control goes back to the place after the recursive function is called
once the no. of element is equal to one and starts merging after which it will
again start to split the remaining items.
Thank you Chris for your multiple explanations.
One final q
On Fri, 31 May 2013 00:03:13 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
>
>> From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info Subject: Re: Short-circuit
>> Logic
>> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 05:42:17 + To: python-list@python.org
> [...]
>> Here's another way, mathematicall
On 30May2013 21:54, bhk...@gmail.com wrote:
| One final question, Is there a way to edit the message once it has been
posted?
Essentially, no. If there's some error in a post, reply to it
yourself with a correction. Transparency is a good thing. Revisionist
history pretty much is not.
--
Camer
> From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
> Subject: Re: Short-circuit Logic
> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 05:13:51 +
> To: python-list@python.org
>
> On Fri, 31 May 2013 00:03:13 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
>
>> ---
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
