On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Andreas Perstinger
wrote:
> Do you mean this license?:
> http://packages.python.org/PollyReports/license.html
>
> It's the standard license for NetBSD projects and approved by OSI:
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
>
> and GPL-compatible:
> http:
On 12/07/2012 07:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:04:51 -0700, 8 Dihedral wrote:
I have to make sure my functor to keep the state variable values for
different objects that call the same functor to behave correctly in
order to avoid passing extra parameters in various obj
On 7/11/12 9:21 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
Exactly. It's threads like these which remind me why I never use lambda. I would rather
give a function an explicit name and adhere to the familiar Python syntax, despite the
two extra lines of code. I don't even like the name "lambda". It doesn't tel
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:43:11 +0200, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
>> funcs = [ lambda x: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ]
>> print funcs[0]( 2 )
>> print funcs[1]( 2 )
>> print funcs[2]( 2 )
>>
>> This gives me
>>
>> 16 16 16
>>
>> When I was excepting
>>
>> 1
>> 2
>> 4
>>
>> Does anyone know why?
>
> And m
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:59:06 +1000
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Andreas Perstinger
> wrote:
> > Do you mean this license?:
> > http://packages.python.org/PollyReports/license.html
> >
> > It's the standard license for NetBSD projects and approved by OSI:
> > http://w
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:44:15 +, Alister wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:43:11 +0200, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
>
>>> funcs = [ lambda x: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ]
[...]
> Having read Steve's explanation in the other thread (which I think has
> finally flipped the light switch on lambda for m
You are contradicting yourself. Either the OS is providing a fully
atomic rename or it doesn't. All POSIX compatible OS provide an atomic
rename functionality that renames the file atomically or fails without
loosing the target side. On POSIX OS it doesn't matter if the target exists.
This is no
Renaming files is the wrong way to synchronize a
crawler. Use a database that has ACID properties, such as
SQLite. Far fewer I/O operations are required for small updates.
It's not the 1980s any more.
I agree with this approach. However, the OP specifically asked about
"how to update stat
Apparently my test hasn't kept up with my update. I'll get it revised
soon and make a new release.
BTW... who is Simon? I wrote the tutorial. (Solomoriah is an old
handle I still use a lot since it's less common than Chris.)
-- Chris.
On 07/12/2012 03:32 AM, Johann Spies wrote:
On 12 Jul
On Jul 11, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Simon Cropper
wrote:
> On 12/07/12 00:06, Chris Gonnerman wrote:
>> I've held off announcing this until I was sure it was really stable;
>> it's been 19 days since I made the last change to it, so here goes.
>> PollyReports is my Python module for report generation. I
Am 12.07.2012 14:30, schrieb Laszlo Nagy:
> This is not a contradiction. Although the rename operation is atomic,
> the whole "change status" process is not. It is because there are two
> operations: #1 delete old status file and #2. rename the new status
> file. And because there are two operation
On 12/07/12 14:30:41, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
>> You are contradicting yourself. Either the OS is providing a fully
>> atomic rename or it doesn't. All POSIX compatible OS provide an atomic
>> rename functionality that renames the file atomically or fails without
>> loosing the target side. On POSIX OS
One thing that I don't quite understand is why some calls even if I
catch the exception still makes the whole program quit.
For example this
try:
copytree('sjkdf', 'dsflkj')
Popen(['notfouhd'], shell=True)
except Exception as e:
print("here")
behaves differently f
On 07/11/2012 03:51 AM, Vojtěch Polášek wrote:
> Greetings,
> My name is Vojta and I am blind student. I am slowly learning Python for
> about 4 years and I like it alot, mostly its ability to run on various
> platforms.
> My primary system is Ubuntu 12.04, but I have Windows XP at hand. I am
> usi
One way instead that might actually work is this
def default_mock_action(func_name):
def _default_mock_action(*args, **kwargs):
print("running {} with args {} and {}".format(func_name, args, kwargs))
return _default_mock_action
def mock_fs_actions(to_run):
"""Take a function
In andrea crotti
writes:
> try:
> copytree('sjkdf', 'dsflkj')
> Popen(['notfouhd'], shell=True)
> except Exception as e:
> print("here")
> behaves differently from:
> try:
> Popen(['notfouhd'], shell=True)
> copytree('sjkdf', 'dsflkj')
>
Wow, I posted this on Github weeks ago, and got no feedback; put it on
PyPI at the same time, with the same results; but one day on the Python
list and I have lots of excellent feedback.
I've just posted PollyReports 1.5.1, with no operational changes. The
package includes a corrected testpoll
Well that's what I thought, but I can't find any explicit exit
anywhere in shutil, so what's going on there?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In andrea crotti
writes:
> Well that's what I thought, but I can't find any explicit exit
> anywhere in shutil, so what's going on there?
Try catching SystemExit specifically (it doesn't inherit from Exception,
so "except Exception" won't catch it.)
--
John Gordon A is for
2012/7/12 John Gordon :
> In andrea crotti
> writes:
>
>> Well that's what I thought, but I can't find any explicit exit
>> anywhere in shutil, so what's going on there?
>
> Try catching SystemExit specifically (it doesn't inherit from Exception,
> so "except Exception" won't catch it.)
>
> --
The PSF Python Brochure Project has finished the content and layout
phase. The first full format pre-production issues were shown at the
PSF booth during the EuroPython Conference 2012 in Florence, Italy,
and caused a lot of excitement - to print the brochure we now need
supporting sponsors.
Pleas
Laszlo Nagy:
> This is not a contradiction. Although the rename operation is atomic,
> the whole "change status" process is not. It is because there are two
> operations: #1 delete old status file and #2. rename the new status
> file. And because there are two operations, there is still a race
> co
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:41:57 +0200, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
>
>> funcs = [ lambda x: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ]
>
> Here's another solution:
>
> from functools import partial
> funcs = [partial(lambda i, x: x**i, i) for i in range(5)]
>
>
On 12/07/2012 04:59, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:41:57 +0200, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
funcs = [ lambda x: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ]
Here's another solution:
from functools import partial
funcs = [partial(lambda i, x: x**i, i) for i in range(5)]
Notice that the arguments
Sorry, but you are wrong. It's just one operation that boils down to
"point name to a different inode". After the rename op the file name
either points to a different inode or still to the old name in case of
an error. The OS guarantees that all processes either see the first or
second state (in
This is not a contradiction. Although the rename operation is atomic,
the whole "change status" process is not. It is because there are two
operations: #1 delete old status file and #2. rename the new status
file. And because there are two operations, there is still a race
condition. I see no co
Using Python 3.2.3
In shell I made a simple program; dog=2,cat=3,cow=dog+cat
Entered cow and received 5 as answer
Saved-as Trial-1.py in a user folder
Went to folder and select "edit with shell" for that file
Trial-1.py displayed, clicked save, run and then run module to activate program
got messag
Windows doesn't suppport atomic renames if the right side exists. I
suggest that you implement two code paths:
if os.name == "posix":
rename = os.rename
else:
def rename(a, b):
try:
os.rename(a, b)
except OSError, e:
if e.errno != 183:
On 12/07/2012 18:48, John Magness wrote:
Using Python 3.2.3
In shell I made a simple program; dog=2,cat=3,cow=dog+cat
Entered cow and received 5 as answer
Saved-as Trial-1.py in a user folder
Went to folder and select "edit with shell" for that file
Trial-1.py displayed, clicked save, run and the
andrea crotti wrote at 2012-7-12 14:20 +0100:
>One thing that I don't quite understand is why some calls even if I
>catch the exception still makes the whole program quit.
>For example this
>
>try:
>copytree('sjkdf', 'dsflkj')
>Popen(['notfouhd'], shell=True)
>except Excepti
Am 12.07.2012 19:43, schrieb Laszlo Nagy:
> Well, I didn't know that this is going to work. At least it does not
> work on Windows 7 (which should be POSIX compatible?)
Nope, Windows's file system layer is not POSIX compatible. For example
you can't remove or replace a file while it is opened by a
On Jul 12, 2:39 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Windows's file system layer is not POSIX compatible. For example
> you can't remove or replace a file while it is opened by a process.
Sounds like a reasonable fail-safe to me. Not much unlike a car
ignition that will not allow starting the engine if
On 12/07/12 08:42, Jean Dubois wrote:
> On 12 jul, 02:59, Vincent Vande Vyvre
> wrote:
>> On 11/07/12 17:37, Jean Dubois wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'm trying to combine python-code made with QT4 designer with plain
>>> python statements like
>>> file = open("test","w")
>>> Can anyone tell me
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:05:26 +0200, Christian Heimes wrote:
> You need to flush the data to disk as well as the metadata of the file
> and its directory in order to survive a system crash. The close()
> syscall already makes sure that all data is flushed into the IO layer of
> the operating system
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:17:03 +0100, andrea crotti wrote:
> Well that's what I thought, but I can't find any explicit exit anywhere
> in shutil, so what's going on there?
Hard to say, since you don't give any context to your question.
When replying to posts, please leave enough quoted to establis
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2:39 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
>> Windows's file system layer is not POSIX compatible. For example
>> you can't remove or replace a file while it is opened by a process.
>
> Sounds like a reasonable fail-safe to me.
POSIX says
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:37:42 +0100, andrea crotti wrote:
> 2012/7/12 John Gordon :
>> In andrea crotti
>> writes:
>>
>>> Well that's what I thought, but I can't find any explicit exit
>>> anywhere in shutil, so what's going on there?
>>
>> Try catching SystemExit specifically (it doesn't inherit
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:20:18 +0100, andrea crotti wrote:
> One thing that I don't quite understand is why some calls even if I
> catch the exception still makes the whole program quit.
Without seeing your whole program, we can't possibly answer this. But by
consulting my crystal ball, I bet you
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:12:01 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Rick Johnson
> wrote:
>> On Jul 12, 2:39 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
>>> Windows's file system layer is not POSIX compatible. For example you
>>> can't remove or replace a file while it is opened by a p
On Thursday 12 July 2012 23:21:16 Steven D'Aprano did opine:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:12:01 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Rick Johnson
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Jul 12, 2:39 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
> >>> Windows's file system layer is not POSIX compatible.
I'm going to be looking into writing a wrapper for the Allegro 5 game
development libraries, either with ctypes or Cython. They technically
have a basic 1:1 ctypes wrapper currently, but I wanted to make
something more pythonic, because it'd be next to impossible to deal
with the memory management
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:49:02 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> When I wanted to impress the visiting frogs, I often did something I
> have never been able to do on any other operating system since, start
> assembling a long assembly language file on one of the screens on the
> color monitor, hit the cl
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:13:47 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Rick has obviously never tried to open a file for reading when somebody
> else has it opened, also for reading, and discovered that despite Windows
> being allegedly a multi-user operating system, you can't actually have
> mu
On Jul 11, 11:41 am, Daniel Fetchinson
wrote:
> funcs = [ lambda x: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ]
> print funcs[0]( 2 )
> print funcs[1]( 2 )
> print funcs[2]( 2 )
>
> This gives me
>
> 16
> 16
> 16
>
> When I was excepting
>
> 1
> 2
> 4
>
> Does anyone know why?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
Your expectatio
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:26 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:13:47 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Rick has obviously never tried to open a file for reading when somebody
>> else has it opened, also for reading, and discovered that despite Windows
>> being allegedly a multi-user op
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:11 -0700, Rick Johnson wrote:
> I've tried to condense your code using the very limited info you have
> provided. I have removed unnecessarily configuring of widgets and
> exaggerated the widget borders to make debugging easier. Read below
> for Q&A.
>
> ## START CONDENSED
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:33:40 -0700, rusi wrote:
> On Jul 11, 11:41 am, Daniel Fetchinson
> wrote:
>> funcs = [ lambda x: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ] print funcs[0]( 2 )
>> print funcs[1]( 2 )
>> print funcs[2]( 2 )
>>
>> This gives me
>>
>> 16
>> 16
>> 16
>>
>> When I was excepting
>>
>> 1
>> 2
>>
47 matches
Mail list logo
