On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:59:06 +1000 Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Andreas Perstinger > <andiper...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Do you mean this license?: > > http://packages.python.org/PollyReports/license.html > > > > It's the standard license for NetBSD projects and approved by OSI: > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php > > > > and GPL-compatible: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#FreeBSD > > Can you state that on the page, perhaps? It'd mean that anyone who's > familiar with the license can read one keyword and know what the terms > are, rather than dig through the full text to see if it's really the > same or not. I'm not responsible for any of the tree pages I've mentioned. I've just looked at the "PollyReports"-license page because I was curious which "strange" license the original author uses. Then I noticed it's just one of the BSD-licenses, used Wikipedia to confirm it and searched for the two other pages to show that it isn't problematic at all. Bye, Andreas -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
