On Aug 16, 8:08 pm, Jacky wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for your comments! Please check mine inline.
>
> On Aug 17, 1:50 am, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>
> > On Monday 16 August 2010, it occurred to Jacky to exclaim:
>
> > > Hi there,
>
> > > Recently I'm facing a problem to convert 4 bytes on an by
Baba wrote:
[ ... ]
> Now, i believe that the number of consecutive passes required to make
> this work is equal to the smallest number of pack sizes. So if we have
> packs of (9,12,21) the number of passes needed would be 9 and the
> theorem would read
>
> "If it is possible to buy n,n+1,n+2,...n
On Aug 16, 8:36 pm, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Aug 16, 8:08 pm, Jacky wrote:
> > My concern is that struct may need to parse the format string,
> > construct the list, and de-reference index=0 for this generated list
> > to get the int out.
>
> > There should be some way more efficient?
>
> Well,
Baba writes:
> Hi Mel,
>
> indeed i thought of generalising the theorem as follows:
> If it is possible to buy n, n+1,~, n+(x-1) sets of McNuggets, for some
> x, then it is possible to buy any number of McNuggets >= x, given that
> McNuggets come in x, y and z packs.
>
> so with diophantine_nugge
well i still believe that the key is the smallest sized pack and
there's no need to go into higher mathematics to solve this problem.
I think below code works within the limits of the exercise which
states to look at a maximum range of 200 in order not to search
forever.
packages=[2,103,105]
min_s
On 8/16/2010 4:18 PM, Baba wrote:
packages=[2,103,105]
min_size=min(packages[0],packages[1],packages[2])
or:
min_size = min(packages)
-John
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:17:20 -0700, Steve Ferg wrote:
> In this little script:
>
>
> import pdb
> pdb.set_trace()
> def main():
> xm = 123
> print("Hello,world!")
> main()
>
>
> When I run this, I use pdb to step through it until I reach the point in
> main() where the xm varia
On Aug 9, 8:19 am, Mike Kent wrote:
> On Aug 8, 8:43 pm, rantingrick wrote:
> Xah, this is really you, isn't it. Come on, confess.
*MOI*, How could *I* be xah. I really don't like Ruby however he
gushes over it all the time. And he does not like Python that much
either. We are total opposites,
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:17:20 -0700, Steve Ferg wrote:
> In this little script:
>
>
> import pdb
> pdb.set_trace()
> def main():
> xm = 123
> print("Hello,world!")
> main()
>
>
> When I run this, I use pdb to step through it until I reach the point in
> main() where the xm varia
On Aug 8, 8:15 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:43:03 -0700, rantingrick wrote:
> > Ruby has what they
> > call a "Here Doc". Besides picking the most boneheaded name for such an
> > object
>
> It's standard terminology that has been around for a long time in many
> different l
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:46:17 -0700, Alex Willmer wrote:
> On Aug 16, 12:23 pm, Steven D'Aprano cybersource.com.au> wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:36:07 -0700, Alex Willmer wrote:
>> > On Aug 16, 1:07 am, Steven D'Aprano > > cybersource.com.au> wrote:
>> >> You're passing re.IGNORECASE (which ha
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:24:25PM +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:21:51 +0200, fons wrote:
>
> > The documentation on execfile() and locals() makes it clear that code
> > executed from execfile() can not modify local variables in the function
> > from wich execfile() was c
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:40:52 +0200, Frederic Rentsch wrote:
> How about
>
[obj for obj in dataList if obj.number == 100]
>
> That should create a list of all objects whose .number is 100. No need
> to cycle through a loop.
What do you think the list comprehension does, if not cycle throug
In message
<5fa7b287-0199-4349-ae0d-c34c8461c...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>, Standish
P wrote:
> We envisage an exogenous stack which has malloc() associated
> with a push and free() associated with a pop.
Since when are malloc(3) and free(3) exogenous?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
Hey everyone, I'm trying to be able to run my app, which uses pygtk,
under windows, but unfortunately I'm having big problems with it. The main
purpose of this is to later on make an .exe file but i havent even been able
to run the app at least.
I've followed every single step from this faq
On Aug 17, 3:32 am, Eric Brunel
wrote:
> In article
> <993d9560-564d-47f0-b2db-6f0c6404a...@g6g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Jah_Alarm wrote:
> > hi,
>
> > pls help me out with the following issue: I wrote a function that uses
> > a for loop that changes a value of a certain variable each itera
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:27:32 +0200, Alex van der Spek wrote:
> Here is an excerpt. It works because the end condition is a fixed number
> (ln==10255), the approximate number of data lines in a file. If I
> replace that condition by EOFError, the program does not do the intended
> work. It appears
hi,
I need to generate a binary array with a specified average proportion
of 1s (e.g. [1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0] has this proportion = 25%). In Matlab I run something like
random(m,n)http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Aug 16, 2010, at 20:37 , Jah_Alarm wrote:
hi,
I need to generate a binary array with a specified average proportion
of 1s (e.g. [1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0] has this proportion = 25%). In Matlab I run something like
random(m,n)
if you're coming from matlab, then you should use the numpy package
(an
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply. Agree and I'll use your suggestions. Thanks!
-Jacky
On Aug 17, 3:36 am, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Aug 16, 8:08 pm, Jacky wrote:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
>
> > Thanks for your comments! Please check mine inline.
>
> > On Aug 17, 1:50 am, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>
> >
On Aug 17, 3:38 am, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On Monday 16 August 2010, it occurred to Jacky to exclaim:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi Thomas,
>
> > Thanks for your comments! Please check mine inline.
>
> > On Aug 17, 1:50 am, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> > > On Monday 16 August 2010, it occurred to Jacky to exclai
In article ,
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> Say you have intensity data captured from an X-ray goniometer from 160
> degrees to 30 degrees at 0.01 degree resolution. Which is most evil of
> the following?
>
> 1) real intensity[16000:3000]
>for i from lwb intensity to upb intensity
> plot(
On Aug 17, 3:53 am, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Aug 16, 8:36 pm, Mark Dickinson wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 16, 8:08 pm, Jacky wrote:
> > > My concern is that struct may need to parse the format string,
> > > construct the list, and de-reference index=0 for this generated list
> > > to get the in
On Aug 16, 5:37 pm, Jah_Alarm wrote:
> hi,
>
> I need to generate a binary array with a specified average proportion
> of 1s (e.g. [1 0 0 0
>
> 0 1 0 0] has this proportion = 25%). In Matlab I run something like
> random(m,n)
> between 0 and 1. I'm trying to use random.randint(0,2,size=[m,n]), but
Hello Comp.Lang,Python,
1) How do I parse Basic Posix RE's in Python (i need it because of
some old scripts and a specific OS developed in Seattle)
2) How can I split a string into sections that MATCH a regex (rather
then splitting by seperator). Tokenizer-style but ignoring every place
from wh
[Paddy]
> Lets say you have two *sets* of integers representing two near-copies
> of some system, then a measure of their difference could be calculated
> as:
>
> len(X.symmetric_difference(Y)) / (len(X) + len(Y)) * 100 %
>
> If the two collections of integers are allowed duplicates then you
> need
On Aug 17, 2:57 am, Jeff Hobbs wrote:
> On Aug 16, 7:30 am, ChrisChia wrote:
>
> > I have this:
> > image1 = ImageTk.PhotoImage(file = "c:\\f1.jpg")
> > image2 = ImageTk.PhotoImage(file = "c:\\f2.jpg")
>
> > imagelist.append(image1)
> > imagelist.append(image2)
>
> > self.label = tk.Label(image
In message , Roy Smith wrote:
> 5) real intensity[160.0 : 30.0 : 0.01]
How many elements in that array?
a) 2999
b) 3000
c) neither of the above
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article ,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message , Roy Smith wrote:
>
> > 5) real intensity[160.0 : 30.0 : 0.01]
>
> How many elements in that array?
>
> a) 2999
> b) 3000
> c) neither of the above
c) neither of the above. More specifically, 13,001 (if I counted
correctly).
--
http://
As monitors are getting bigger, is there a general change in opinion on
the 79 chars limit in source files? I've experimented with 98 characters
per line and I find it quite a bit more comfortable to work with that
length, even though sometimes I have to edit files in 80 width
terminals, it's stil
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:35 PM, AK wrote:
> As monitors are getting bigger, is there a general change in opinion on
> the 79 chars limit in source files? I've experimented with 98 characters
> per line and I find it quite a bit more comfortable to work with that
> length, even though sometimes I
In article ,
James Mills wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:35 PM, AK wrote:
> > As monitors are getting bigger, is there a general change in opinion on
> > the 79 chars limit in source files? I've experimented with 98 characters
> > per line and I find it quite a bit more comfortable to work
On 08/16/2010 10:42 PM, James Mills wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:35 PM, AK wrote:
As monitors are getting bigger, is there a general change in opinion on
the 79 chars limit in source files? I've experimented with 98 characters
per line and I find it quite a bit more comfortable to work wit
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> I disagree with James. I have no problem with going wider than 80, if
> it improves readability by not forcing you to fold lines in unnatural
> places.
>
> There's more important things to worry about.
Roy, under normal circumstances I would a
hi, this is probably a very silly question, but I can't get my hear
around it unfortunately(
I have an array (say, mat=rand(3,5)) from which I 'pull out' a row
(say, s1=mat[1,]). The problem is, the shape of this row s1 is not
[1,5], as I would expect, but rather [5,], which means that I can't,
fo
Hello,
I started learning python last year. All of this time i have used the
terminal and gedit to create, modify, and test my applications and modules.
For some reason I can not do this any more.
I'll try to do my best to explain whats happening.
I have a script modtest.py which has a function t
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:33 PM, kreglet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started learning python last year. All of this time i have used the
> terminal and gedit to create, modify, and test my applications and modules.
> For some reason I can not do this any more.
> I'll try to do my best to explain whats
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:35:49 -0400, AK wrote:
> As monitors are getting bigger, is there a general change in opinion on
> the 79 chars limit in source files? I've experimented with 98 characters
> per line and I find it quite a bit more comfortable to work with that
> length, even though sometimes
On 8/16/10 9:29 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
In article,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message, Roy Smith wrote:
5) real intensity[160.0 : 30.0 : 0.01]
How many elements in that array?
a) 2999
b) 3000
c) neither of the above
c) neither of the above. More specifically, 13,001 (if I counted
co
On 8/16/10 10:07 PM, Aram Ter-Sarkissov wrote:
hi, this is probably a very silly question, but I can't get my hear
around it unfortunately(
I have an array (say, mat=rand(3,5)) from which I 'pull out' a row
(say, s1=mat[1,]). The problem is, the shape of this row s1 is not
[1,5], as I would expe
hi, I've already asked this question but so far the progress has been
small.
I'm running Tkinter. I have some elements on the screen (Labels, most
importantly) which content has to be updated every iteration of the
algorithm run, e.g. "Iteration =" [i] for i in range(n), n=100. I'm
using the updat
On 08/16/2010 11:51 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:35:49 -0400, AK wrote:
As monitors are getting bigger, is there a general change in opinion on
the 79 chars limit in source files? I've experimented with 98 characters
per line and I find it quite a bit more comfortable to wo
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:56:20 -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 8/16/10 9:29 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
>> In article,
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>> In message, Roy Smith wrote:
>>>
5) real intensity[160.0 : 30.0 : 0.01]
>>>
>>> How many elements in that array?
>>>
>>> a) 2999
>>> b) 3000
>>>
Greetings,
I want a debugging function with the effect of the function below (in a
seperate module):
def dump(expr):
print expr, '=', eval(expr)
foo = 33
dump('foo')
Of course this fails when called from another module because eval does not
know the globals or locals of the caller. Is the
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:12 PM, AK wrote:
> There's no doubt that there are pro's and con's, but to be fair, it's
> not like code becomes unreadable over 79 chars - the difference is that
> when your terminal is 80 chars, it's less convenient for you to read
> code that's wider and when your term
On Aug 16, 11:04 am, Baba wrote:
> Hi Chas, Roald,
>
> These are all complicated formula that i believe are not expected at
> this level. If you look at the source (see my first submission) you
> will see that this exercise is only the second in a series called
> "Introduction to Programming". The
On Aug 16, 9:07 pm, Jah_Alarm wrote:
I have some elements on the screen (Labels, most
> importantly) which content has to be updated every iteration of the
> algorithm
The variable type is IntVar()
You would use int_var_name.set(some_number)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
On 08/17/2010 12:26 AM, James Mills wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:12 PM, AK wrote:
There's no doubt that there are pro's and con's, but to be fair, it's
not like code becomes unreadable over 79 chars - the difference is that
when your terminal is 80 chars, it's less convenient for you to rea
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, AK wrote:
> By the way, the reason I asked is that we're working on a python
> tutorial and I realized that even though I'm used to 99, I wasn't sure
> if it's ok to teach that to new users or not..
In my opinion it would be "okay" to teach. However:
Bare in mind
On 08/16/2010 08:59 PM, AK wrote:
> But.. why horizontal scrolling, isn't autowrap much better than that?
Wouldn't it really make a visual mess of Python code if lines wrapped?
Maybe if they wrapped smartly.
In general, the only time I find my lines longer than 75 characters are
strings or somet
On 08/16/2010 10:50 PM, AK wrote:
> I stay away from ugly cramped one-liners; I mostly run over 79 when I
> have a few `and` and `or` clauses or long strings. I've also noticed
> something interesting: going from 79 to 99 affects a relatively large
> number of lines, but going over 99 (i.e. 99 to 1
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
