Baba wrote:
[ ... ]
> Now, i believe that the number of consecutive passes required to make
> this work is equal to the smallest number of pack sizes. So if we have
> packs of (9,12,21) the number of passes needed would be 9 and the
> theorem would read
>
> "If it is possible to buy n,n+1,n+2,...n+8 nuggets it is possible to
> buy any number of nuggets >= 9 given that they come in packs of
> 9,12,21"
That's the proper statement.
>
> However i turn in circles because i don't seem to get any results for
> some random pack combinations like (9,12,21) or (10,20,30).
That "if it is possible" is the big if. If every package you can buy has a
multiple of 3, then every possible purchase will be a multiple of 3.
Nothing that leaves a remainder of 1 or 2 will ever show up.
>
> The must always be a solution i'm thinking, be it the smallest pack -
> 1
The set (9/3, 12/3, 21/3) settles down pretty quickly:
>>> s = nuggets.buyable_set ((3, 4, 7))
>>> nuggets.print_from (s, xrange(20))
0 set([])
3 set([0])
4 set([0])
6 set([3])
7 set([0, 3, 4])
8 set([4])
9 set([6])
10 set([3, 6, 7])
11 set([8, 4, 7])
12 set([8, 9])
13 set([9, 10, 6])
14 set([10, 11, 7])
15 set([8, 11, 12])
16 set([9, 12, 13])
17 set([10, 13, 14])
18 set([11, 14, 15])
19 set([16, 12, 15])
>>>
The printout here is the 'genaeology' of each purchase -- the set of smaller
purchases from which you can reach each one. After ...,6,7,8,... every
larger number can be reached.
Mel.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
