On Jun 30, 6:01 pm, Justin Ezequiel
wrote:
> On Jul 1, 7:39 am, Jay wrote:
>
> > I would like to create a python script that plays the Windows game
> > minesweeper.
>
> > The python code logic and running minesweeper are not problems.
> > However, "seeing" the 1-8 in the minesweeper map and click
Jay wrote:
On Jun 30, 6:01 pm, Justin Ezequiel
wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:39 am, Jay wrote:
I would like to create a python script that plays the Windows game
minesweeper.
The python code logic and running minesweeper are not problems.
However, "seeing" the 1-8 in the minesweeper map and clicking on
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Jay wrote:
> On Jun 30, 6:01 pm, Justin Ezequiel
> wrote:
>> you may want to have a look at sikulihttp://groups.csail.mit.edu/uid/sikuli/
>
> Intresting, but I actually have something already in python I want to
> modify.
You should be able to use it with Jython.
On 6/27/2010 1:09 PM, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
I agree that there may be not much reason to port custom proprietary
apps that are working fine and which would hardly benefit from, let
alone need, and new Py3 features.
In the long run, there will be a benefit: at some point in the future
(surely
On Jun 30, 6:39 pm, Jay wrote:
> I would like to create a python script that plays the Windows game
> minesweeper.
>
> The python code logic and running minesweeper are not problems.
> However, "seeing" the 1-8 in the minesweeper map and clicking on
> squares is. I have no idea how to proceed.
Yo
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:57:58 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
>>> Actually, I agree with this complaint though- it is much easier to
>>> type spaces than parens.
>>
>> Yes. And typing "p" is easier than typing "print". Perhaps we should
>> replace all Python built-ins with one letter names so that we c
On 6/30/10 6:48 PM, John Nagle wrote:
The 10th anniversary of the announcement of PERL 6 is coming
up on July 19th, and it still hasn't displaced PERL 5 as the
"primary" version.
Now, I may be totally off-base, because I do not grok perl and so have
never made much of an effort to follow perl-
John Nagle wrote:
On 6/27/2010 1:09 PM, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
I agree that there may be not much reason to port custom proprietary
apps that are working fine and which would hardly benefit from, let
alone need, and new Py3 features.
In the long run, there will be a benefit: at some point in
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:57:58 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
>
Actually, I agree with this complaint though- it is much easier to
type spaces than parens.
>>>
>>> Yes. And typing "p" is easier than typing "print". Perhaps we should
>
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> But, honestly, is there anyone here, even the most heavy users of
> print, who would seriously expect that adding parentheses to print
> calls will do more than add a tiny fraction to the amount of typing
> effort already required to use Python? I suppose in principle th
On Jun 30, 12:13 am, Дамјан Георгиевски wrote:
> > I'm writing this as a complete newbie (on the issue), so don't be
> > surprised if it's the stupidest idea ever.
>
> > I was wondering if there was ever a discusision in the python
> > community on a 'raise-yield' kind-of combined expression. I'd
If I write things with the intermediate variables like below, everything
works:
>>> x="quick brown fox jumps over a lazy dog"
>>> y=list(x)
>>> y
['q', 'u', 'i', 'c', 'k', ' ', 'b', 'r', 'o', 'w', 'n', ' ', 'f', 'o',
'x', ' ', 'j', 'u', 'm', 'p', 's', ' ', 'o', 'v', 'e', 'r', ' ', 'a', '
', 'l'
On 6/30/10 8:50 PM, Mladen Gogala wrote:
x="quick brown fox jumps over a lazy dog"
y=''.join(list(x).reverse())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
TypeError
Why is TypeError being thrown? The reason for throwing the type error is
the fact that the internal expressio
Hello,
>>> y=list(x).reverse()
> >>> print y
> None
>
>>> L = ["a", "b", "c"]
>>> L.reverse()
>>> L
["c", "b", "a"]
As you can see, L.reverse() performs the operation on itself and returns
nothing. Hence, the return type None.
Instead of
y=''.join(list(x).reverse())
you should probably do,
>
I have this function:
def GetMakeOutput(make, rules, out=None):
p = subprocess.Popen('%s %s' % (make,rules),
shell=True,
bufsize=1024,
stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Zubin Mithra wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> >>> y=list(x).reverse()
>> >>> print y
>> None
>
L = ["a", "b", "c"]
L.reverse()
L
> ["c", "b", "a"]
>
> As you can see, L.reverse() performs the operation on itself and returns
> nothing. Hence, the return type None
> Er, I don't think you thought that one entirely through (/ tried it out):
>
>
My Apologies.
Here is a working one.
>>> x="123"
>>> t = list(x)
>>> t.reverse()
>>> print ''.join(t)
321
But of course, the method which was suggested earlier is far more elegant.
>>> print ''.join(reversed(list(
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:12 PM, m wrote:
> I have this function:
>
>
> def GetMakeOutput(make, rules, out=None):
> p = subprocess.Popen('%s %s' % (make,rules),
> shell=True,
> bufsize=1024,
> stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
>
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:04:28 -0700, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 6/30/10 8:50 PM, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> x="quick brown fox jumps over a lazy dog"
> y=''.join(list(x).reverse())
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>File "", line 1, in
>> TypeError
>
>
>>
>> Why is TypeError be
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:13:53 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
>> But, honestly, is there anyone here, even the most heavy users of
>> print, who would seriously expect that adding parentheses to print
>> calls will do more than add a tiny fraction to the amount of typing
>> e
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:13:53 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > Steven D'Aprano writes:
> >> I suppose in principle those extra three key presses (shift-9
> >> shift-0 vs space) could be the straw that breaks the camel's back,
> >> but I doubt it.
> >
> > There's also Fitt
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
>> On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:13:53 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>>
>> > Steven D'Aprano writes:
>> >> I suppose in principle those extra three key presses (shift-9
>> >> shift-0 vs space) could be the straw that breaks the ca
In article <4c29ad38$0$26210$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>Aahz a écrit :
>> In article <4c285e7c$0$17371$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
>> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>>> Aahz a écrit :
In article <4c2747c1$0$4545$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>>>
On 06/30/2010 06:36 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message ,
> Michael Torrie wrote:
>
>> Okay, I will. Your code passes a char** when a char* is expected.
>
> No it doesn’t.
You're right; it doesn't. Your code passes char (*)[512].
warning: passing argument 1 of ‘snprintf’ from incompati
Hans Mulder wrote:
> There's also: hasattr(, '__call__'). It works in both 2.x and 3.x.
Good work, Hans. I do find that to be a more pythonic approach,
personally, being more concerned with an object's ability than its
abstract type.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 6/30/10 10:37 PM, Aahz wrote:
In article<4c29ad38$0$26210$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Aahz a écrit :
In article<4c285e7c$0$17371$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Aahz a écrit :
In article<4c2747c1$0$4545$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
Bruno Desthuilliers
I have a byte-string which is an escape sequence, that is, it starts with
a backslash, followed by either a single character, a hex or octal escape
sequence. E.g. something like one of these in Python 2.5:
'\\n'
'\\xFF'
'\\023'
If s is such a string, what is the right way to un-escape them to s
geremy condra writes:
> > Right. I'm much more concerned about the position of my Ctrl key, to
> > avoid hand injury from all the key chording done as a programmer.
>
> Not saying its a cure-all, but I broke my hand pretty badly a few years
> ago and had a lot of luck with a homemade foot switch
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I have a byte-string which is an escape sequence, that is, it starts with
> a backslash, followed by either a single character, a hex or octal escape
> sequence. E.g. something like one of these in Python 2.5:
>
> '\\n'
> '\\xFF'
> '\\023'
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 16:20 -0700, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Jun 30, 10:48 am, John Nagle wrote:
> > On 6/30/2010 12:13 AM, Дамјан Георгиевски wrote:
> >
> > >> A 'raise-yield' expression would break the flow of a program just like
> > >> an exception, going up the call stack until it would be h
"Steven D'Aprano" wrote in message
news:4c2c2cab$0$14136$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com...
I have a byte-string which is an escape sequence, that is, it starts with
a backslash, followed by either a single character, a hex or octal escape
sequence. E.g. something like one of these in Python 2.5:
'
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:11:59 -0700, Chris Rebert wrote:
> Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, May 25 2010, 18:21:57)
'\\xFF'.decode('string_escape')
> '\xff'
I knew unicode-escape, obviously, and then I tried just 'escape', but
never thought of 'string_escape'.
Thanks for the quick answer.
--
Ste
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
