In article <4c29ad38$0$26210$426a7...@news.free.fr>, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid> wrote: >Aahz a écrit : >> In article <4c285e7c$0$17371$426a7...@news.free.fr>, >> Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid> wrote: >>> Aahz a écrit : >>>> In article <4c2747c1$0$4545$426a7...@news.free.fr>, >>>> Bruno Desthuilliers <bdesth.quelquech...@free.quelquepart.fr> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Python has no pretention at "elegance". >>>> That's not true at all. More precisely, I would agree with you if the >>>> emphasis is on "pretention" but not if the emphasis is on elegance; >>> Python Zen, #9 (or #8 if you're a TrueHacker !-)) >> >> ...and this implies that Python has no focus on elegance because...? > >Nope, that was an answer about where the emphasis was in my previous >statement. I don't mean Python don't care about or is devoid of >elegance, just that it's not the primary concern - hence the "has no >pretention at" part.
It may not be "the" primary concern, but elegance certainly is *a* primary concern. -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "If you don't know what your program is supposed to do, you'd better not start writing it." --Dijkstra
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
