On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:48:10 -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
>> Variables in a function are already private. How can the names in one
>> function be affected by other functions in the same module?
>
> You misunderstood me.
>
> If there are multiple functions or classes in a file, when I change
> variable
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:54:47 -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
> So python would not be able to accommodate my preference one
> class/function per file?
Of course it does! You can do that RIGHT NOW -- just put one class per
file.
> I.e., I have to use something like 'from spam
> import spam' or 'spam.spam
Robert Kern writes:
> If you are going to expose symbols in your __init__.py, they should
> not have the same name as any of the modules in the package.
Would I be correct in assuming you make an exception for the package
importing one of the modules in the package, and thereby making that
modul
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:38:16 -0300, Gabriel Genellina wrote:
>> Incorrect. Simplicity of implementation and API is a virtue, in and of
>> itself. The existing module machinery is quite simple to understand,
>> use and maintain.
>
> Uhm... module objects might be quite simple to understand, but mo
In message , Carsten
Haese wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> In message , Carsten
>> Haese wrote:
>>
>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
In message ,
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> This way regular string interpolation operations (or whatever Python
> 3.x has replaced it
Ben Finney wrote:
Robert Kern writes:
If you are going to expose symbols in your __init__.py, they should
not have the same name as any of the modules in the package.
Would I be correct in assuming you make an exception for the package
importing one of the modules in the package, and thereby
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
