On Jul 27, 2:39 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Derek Martin a écrit :
> > It's bad programming, but the world is full of bad programmers, and we
> > don't always have the choice not to use their code. Isn't one of
> > Python's goals to minimize opportunities for bad programmi
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
sturlamolden wrote:
> Basically it forks twice ...
What's the advantage of forking twice over forking once and calling setsid?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Johny
wrote:
> Is there a way how to find out running processes?E.g. how many
> Appache's processes are running?
Under Linux, every process has a procfs directory /proc/, where
is the process ID. In here you will find all kinds of interesting
information about th
Hello folks ,I have a program in which a text file is generated as an output
eg
C:\prog\ prog -x test.txt
Right now whenever i have to read the test file i have to put its name
manually in my code.
eg
f=open("c:\\prog\\test.txt","r")
How ever i want to add the name of the test file dynamically to
On Jul 27, 6:21 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russ P. wrote:
> > On Jul 27, 12:39 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
> > All I am suggesting is that the programmer have the option of
> > replacing "self.member" with simply ".member", since the word "self"
> > is arbitrary and unnecessary.
>
> I
On Jul 28, 1:44 pm, Sera Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lot of thanks again, that's what I wanted to find, arguments against
> it, I was aware I wan not speaking of sth new.
Guido seems to keep hinting that someone should write a PEP, just so
it can be officially denied and then there'll be
josh logan wrote:
On Jul 27, 8:45 pm, pigmartian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it could be that 3.0 is using "banker's rounding" --- rounding to the
even digit. the idea behind it behind it being to reduce error
accumulation when working with large sets of values.
Works for me on Python
On Jul 27, 8:38 pm, alex23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 4:59 am, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 27, 3:11 am, alex23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 27, 4:26 pm, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 26, 11:18 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
try optparse :)
http://docs.python.org/lib/module-optparse.html
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:13 PM, aditya shukla
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hello folks ,I have a program in which a text file is generated as an
> output
> eg
>
> C:\prog\ prog -x test.txt
> Right now whenever i have to read the tes
On Jul 27, 8:58 pm, castironpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2:39 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Derek Martin a écrit :
> > > It's bad programming, but the world is full of bad programmers, and we
> > > don't always have the choice not to use their code. Isn't
> > > > On Jul 27, 4:26 pm, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > The use of '.' has been suggested before and rejected.
> > > > > Where and why?
> Dude, I agree with Guido completely on this one. You
> seem to be clueless about the issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just test for maxint value:
from sys import maxint
if maxint >> 33:
print "more than 32 bits" # probably 64
else:
print "32 bits"
Best regards,
Manuel.
Trent Mick wrote:
> norseman wrote:
>>
>> > > I need to know if I'm running on
On Jul 27, 9:44 pm, alex23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On Jul 27, 4:26 pm, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > The use of '.' has been suggested before and rejected.
> > > > > > Where and why?
> > Dude, I agree with Guido co
Derek Martin wrote:
> Regardless of how it's implementd, it's such a common idiom to use
> self to refer to object instances within a class in Python that it
> ought to be more automatic. Personally, I kind of like the idea of
> using @ and thinking of it more like an operator... Kind of like
> d
Derek Martin wrote:
Furthermore, as you described, defining the function within the scope
of a class binds a name to the function and then makes it a method of
the class. Once that happens, *the function has become a method*.
If you mean that a user-defined function object becomes a different
Colin J. Williams wrote:
>>
>> def fun( ., cat):
>>
> I don't see the need for the comma in fun.
It (the entire first variable!) is needed because a method object is
constructed from a normal function object:
def method(self,a,b):
pass
class MyClass(object):
pass
MyClass.tes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> thanks a lot!!! re-read it again!!!
>
> from the struct doc!
> Standard size and alignment are as follows: no alignment is required
> for any type (so you have to use pad bytes); short is 2 bytes; int and
> long are 4 bytes; long long (__int64 on Windows) is 8 bytes; flo
On Jul 27, 10:32 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Derek Martin wrote:
> > Furthermore, as you described, defining the function within the scope
> > of a class binds a name to the function and then makes it a method of
> > the class. Once that happens, *the function has become a method*
On Jul 27, 10:55 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
> In message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Jul 26, 6:47 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
> >> In message
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 27, 5:14 am, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:58:16 -0700, Carl Banks wrote:
> > On Jul 26, 5:07 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Whether or not one should write 'if x' or 'if x != 0' [typo corrected]
> >> depends on whethe
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
