On Jul 27, 9:44 pm, alex23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 27, 4:26 pm, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > The use of <nothing>'.' has been suggested before and rejected. > > > > > > Where and why? > > Dude, I agree with Guido completely on this one. You > > seem to be clueless about the issue here. You're the > > one with the reading comprehension problem. Please > > quit wasting my time with your irrelevant crap. > > I pointed you at a thread -where it had been suggested and rejected-. > And I'm the clueless one? > > I don't think I'm the one wasting anyone's time here, but fine. I've > got far better things to do with my time than waste it talking to you.
What was "suggested in rejected" on the thread you pointed me to was not what I suggested. Not even close. Get it, genius? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list