On Jul 27, 9:44 pm, alex23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On Jul 27, 4:26 pm, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > The use of <nothing>'.' has been suggested before and rejected.
> > > > > > Where and why?
> > Dude, I agree with Guido completely on this one. You
> > seem to be clueless about the issue here. You're the
> > one with the reading comprehension problem. Please
> > quit wasting my time with your irrelevant crap.
>
> I pointed you at a thread -where it had been suggested and rejected-.
> And I'm the clueless one?
>
> I don't think I'm the one wasting anyone's time here, but fine. I've
> got far better things to do with my time than waste it talking to you.

What was "suggested in rejected" on the thread you pointed me to was
not what I suggested. Not even close. Get it, genius?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to