On 2009-12-14 22:49 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
It's currently GPLv3-licensed, but I'd like to dual license it in such a
way that it could eventually be included in the standard library. How
would I go about this?
I would recommend simply using the Apache v2 license. The PSF will only accept
cod
On 12/14/2009 11:49 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
Also, what's the best way to package something like this for consumption
by python-folk? There seem to be so many ways of packaging things
anymore. Are dist utils, a .deb and a .rpm the way to go? Right now,
it's just using make to stuff things in /us
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Also, what's the best way to package something like this for consumption by
> python-folk? There seem to be so many ways of packaging things anymore.
> Are dist utils, a .deb and a .rpm the way to go? Right now, it's just
> using make to
On Dec 14, 8:49 pm, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> It's currently GPLv3-licensed, but I'd like to dual license it in such a
> way that it could eventually be included in the standard library. How
> would I go about this?
I'm not going to try to talk you out of dual licensing it as something
other than G
I've just released my treap.py module:
http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~dstromberg/treap/
It's code that implements a datastructure that is a hybrid of a binary
tree and a binary heap, having some of the advantages of each. The URL
has a table comparing the asymptotic performance of treaps aga
