On 12/14/2009 11:49 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
Also, what's the best way to package something like this for consumption
by python-folk? There seem to be so many ways of packaging things
anymore. Are dist utils, a .deb and a .rpm the way to go? Right now,
it's just using make to stuff things in /usr/local.
There are two versions: One that is pure python, and one that is part
python and part cython. They're automatically generated from a common m4
template.
There are rather plentiful unit tests included in the tar archive.
If the module is pure Python, then for Windows I would be happiest with
a no-install .zip that I can stick into site-packages.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
