On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article <503b3247$0$6877$e4fe5...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
> Hans Mulder wrote:
>> On 26/08/12 20:47:34, Nicholas Cole wrote:
>> It has been changed to
>>
>> ~/Library/Python/$py_version_short/lib/python/site-packages
>>
>> You can find the p
In article <503b3247$0$6877$e4fe5...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
Hans Mulder wrote:
> On 26/08/12 20:47:34, Nicholas Cole wrote:
> It has been changed to
>
> ~/Library/Python/$py_version_short/lib/python/site-packages
>
> You can find the path it's looking for in site.USER_SITE
That is correct.
>
In article
,
Nicholas Cole wrote:
> The only user configuration I've done is to create the following
> configuration file:
>
> NPSC:~ nicholas$ cat .pydistutils.cfg
> [install]
> install_lib = ~/Library/Python/$py_version_short/site-packages
> install_scripts = ~/bin
>
> I should say, this has
On 26/08/12 20:47:34, Nicholas Cole wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> In all previous versions of python, I've been able to install packages
> into the path:
>
> ~/Library/Python/$py_version_short/site-packages
>
> but in the rc builds of python 3.3 this is no longer part of sys.path.
It has been changed
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Nicholas Cole wrote:
>> It certainly does exist. Distutils will happily put packages into it,
>> but import won't find them.
>
> That's odd! It works for me on 10.8 and it worked for me yesterday on
> 10.7 which I tested just
In article
,
Nicholas Cole wrote:
> It certainly does exist. Distutils will happily put packages into it,
> but import won't find them.
That's odd! It works for me on 10.8 and it worked for me yesterday on
10.7 which I tested just after completing the python.org installer
builds. Perhaps th
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Nicholas Cole wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
>> > In article
>> > ,
>> > Nicholas Cole wrote:
>> >> In all previous versions of python, I've been able to install packages
>> >> into the path:
In article
,
Nicholas Cole wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> > In article
> > ,
> > Nicholas Cole wrote:
> >> In all previous versions of python, I've been able to install packages
> >> into the path:
> >>
> >> ~/Library/Python/$py_version_short/site-packages
> >>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Nicholas Cole wrote:
>> In all previous versions of python, I've been able to install packages
>> into the path:
>>
>> ~/Library/Python/$py_version_short/site-packages
>>
>> but in the rc builds of python 3.3 this is no longer
On 26/08/12 21:21:15, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Nicholas Cole wrote:
>> In all previous versions of python, I've been able to install packages
>> into the path:
>>
>> ~/Library/Python/$py_version_short/site-packages
>>
>> but in the rc builds of python 3.3 this is no longer part of sys
In article
,
Nicholas Cole wrote:
> In all previous versions of python, I've been able to install packages
> into the path:
>
> ~/Library/Python/$py_version_short/site-packages
>
> but in the rc builds of python 3.3 this is no longer part of sys.path.
>
> Before I go hacking the install, is t
Dear List,
In all previous versions of python, I've been able to install packages
into the path:
~/Library/Python/$py_version_short/site-packages
but in the rc builds of python 3.3 this is no longer part of sys.path.
Before I go hacking the install, is there a reason that this path was
removed?
12 matches
Mail list logo