Re: Why not have a recvall method?

2018-02-04 Thread 陶青云
Thank you, it's very helpful. I think the recvall should builtin to the _socket module like sendall. -- Original -- From: "Dan Stromberg"; Date: Mon, Feb 5, 2018 06:01 AM To: "陶青云"; Cc: "python-list"; Subject: Re: Why

Re: Why not have a recvall method?

2018-02-04 Thread Dan Stromberg
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 5:26 AM, 陶青云 wrote: > Hello, all > The socket object has a `sendall` method that can send all bytes you > specified. > Oppositely, socket only has a recv method. I wonder why there is not a > `recvall` method? > To workaround this, I use `f = socket.mak

Re: Why not have a recvall method?

2018-02-04 Thread 陶青云
is reached first). -- Original -- From: "Steven D'Aprano"; Date: Sun, Feb 4, 2018 09:31 PM To: "python-list"; Subject: Re: Why not have a recvall method? On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:26:36 +0800, 陶青云 wrote: > Hello, allThe socket objec

Re: Why not have a recvall method?

2018-02-04 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:26:36 +0800, 陶青云 wrote: > Hello, allThe socket object has a `sendall` method that can send all > bytes you specified. Oppositely, socket only has a recv method. I wonder > why there is not a `recvall` method? To workaround this, I use `f = > socket.makefile(

Why not have a recvall method?

2018-02-04 Thread 陶青云
Hello, all The socket object has a `sendall` method that can send all bytes you specified. Oppositely, socket only has a recv method. I wonder why there is not a `recvall` method? To workaround this, I use `f = socket.makefile('rb')`, then all `f.read(n)` Thanks.

Why not have a recvall method?

2018-02-04 Thread 陶青云
Hello, allThe socket object has a `sendall` method that can send all bytes you specified. Oppositely, socket only has a recv method. I wonder why there is not a `recvall` method? To workaround this, I use `f = socket.makefile('rb')`, then `call f.read(n)` Thanks. -- https://mail.

recvall()

2011-05-15 Thread Navkirat Singh
Hi All, I am trying to program an HTTP webserver, I am a little confused about the best way to program a recvall function. There are a couple of ways to do this? But performance wise which one is better? a) recvall using a timeout? b) recvall using a condition that nothing was received? c