>
> >The zip file essentially contains the whole system in on lump.
Change
> >the system, and naturally your users will have to download the whole
> >lump again. [...]
> >
> but if it was just a dir, when they update from the svn at log in,
all
> they do is download the extra\changed files. much mu
Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got this working now, and fyi it downloads the entire zip every
> time. and svn appears to be very slow at it to.
Hmm, not what I would have expected, and certainly unfortunate for
your desired use case.
I just tried some experiments with rsync (e
Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good point. When I wrote that I was picturing the form of compression
> that a .tar.gz file would have, not what is actually used inside a
> .zip file which is -- quite logically now that you point it out --
> done on a file-by-file basis. (Clearly to d
David Bolen wrote:
>Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>Do you know that Subversion has (as I understand it) a fairly
>>intelligent binary file comparison routine, and it will (again, as I
>>understand it) not transmit the entire contents of the zip file but
>>would actually send on
David Bolen wrote:
> Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Do you know that Subversion has (as I understand it) a fairly
>>intelligent binary file comparison routine, and it will (again, as I
>>understand it) not transmit the entire contents of the zip file but
>>would actually send only the p
Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you know that Subversion has (as I understand it) a fairly
> intelligent binary file comparison routine, and it will (again, as I
> understand it) not transmit the entire contents of the zip file but
> would actually send only the portions that have ch
Just <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [ ... ] (Note to self: check if zip files that can
>> be in sys.path can be compressed,
>
> Yes.
>
>> and if py2exe compresses them.)
>
> Don't know, but I assume yes.
There's an op
Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is it possible instead of py2exe putting all library's in a zip file,
> to just put them in a sub dir?
You can subclass the build_exe command (the extending sample shows how
to do this, althoutgh for a different purpose), and copy the files into
a sub d
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ... ] (Note to self: check if zip files that can
> be in sys.path can be compressed,
Yes.
> and if py2exe compresses them.)
Don't know, but I assume yes.
Just
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Peter Hansen wrote:
>Timothy Smith wrote:
>
>
>>Peter Hansen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Anything's possible. Maybe you could explain what you're actually
>>>trying to accomplish (or the reasons) so we can better understand
>>>where you're going with this...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>exactly what i just st
Timothy Smith wrote:
> Peter Hansen wrote:
>> Anything's possible. Maybe you could explain what you're actually
>> trying to accomplish (or the reasons) so we can better understand
>> where you're going with this...
>>
> exactly what i just stated, i don't want py2exe to zip up it's
> library's
Simon Brunning wrote:
>On 5/4/05, Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Simon Brunning wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The zip file is a generated artifact. I've always found it a good rule
>>>of thumb that you should keep source artifacts in your version control
>>>system, not generated artifacts.
On 5/4/05, Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Brunning wrote:
> >The zip file is a generated artifact. I've always found it a good rule
> >of thumb that you should keep source artifacts in your version control
> >system, not generated artifacts.
> >
> >
> >
> version control systems a
On 5/3/05, Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> exactly what i just stated, i don't want py2exe to zip up it's
> library's, but to put them in a sub dir.
> the reason for this, is so that when users login and update from svn,
> they only have to download some tiny pyc files, not a great big z
Peter Hansen wrote:
>Timothy Smith wrote:
>
>
>>is it possible instead of py2exe putting all library's in a zip file, to
>>just put them in a sub dir?
>>
>>
>
>Anything's possible. Maybe you could explain what you're actually
>trying to accomplish (or the reasons) so we can better underst
Timothy Smith wrote:
> is it possible instead of py2exe putting all library's in a zip file, to
> just put them in a sub dir?
Anything's possible. Maybe you could explain what you're actually
trying to accomplish (or the reasons) so we can better understand where
you're going with this...
-Pe
is it possible instead of py2exe putting all library's in a zip file, to
just put them in a sub dir?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
17 matches
Mail list logo
