alb wrote:
>> But wait, "".join() only accepts strings so let's change
>>
>>yield [node]
>>
>> to
>>yield [node.name] # str(node) would also work
>
> Again my question, why not simply yield node.name?
I've been conditioned to build a string from many substrings like so
>>> parts = ["foo", "bar"
Hi Peter,
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
[]
> Let's start with the simplest:
>
>> Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>
>>>def show2(self):
>>>yield str(self)
>>>for child in self.children:
>>>yield from child.show2()
[]
>
> Given a tree
>
> A --> A1
>
alb wrote:
> >
> > def read_tree(rows, levelnames):
> >root = Node("#ROOT", "#ROOT")
> >old_level = 0
> >stack = [root]
> >for i, row in enumerate(rows, 1):
>
> I'm not quite sure I understand what is the stack for. As of now is a
> list whose only element is root.
The stack is
alb wrote:
> >
> > def read_tree(rows, levelnames):
> >root = Node("#ROOT", "#ROOT")
> >old_level = 0
> >stack = [root]
> >for i, row in enumerate(rows, 1):
>
> I'm not quite sure I understand what is the stack for. As of now is a
> list whose only element is root.
The stack is
Peter Otten wrote:
> [A, A1, A21, A22]
>
> Finally the append_nodes(A3, nodes) will append A3 and then return because
> it has no children, and we end up with
>
> nodes = [A, A1, A21, A22, A3]
Yay, proofreading! Both lists should contain A2:
[A, A1, A2, A21, A22]
nodes = [A, A1, A2, A21, A22
alb wrote:
> Hi Peter, I'll try to comment the code below to verify if I understood
> it correctly or missing some major parts. Comments are just below code
> with the intent to let you read the code first and my understanding
> afterwards.
Let's start with the simplest:
> Peter Otten <__pete..
Hi Peter, I'll try to comment the code below to verify if I understood
it correctly or missing some major parts. Comments are just below code
with the intent to let you read the code first and my understanding
afterwards.
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
[]
> $ cat parse_column_tree.py
> i
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:32 AM, alb wrote:
> Ok, that either means I need to upgrade to 3.3 or need to modify the
> snippet to a suitable syntax that would work with other versions.
You could replace "yield from child.show2()" with:
for val in child.show2(): yield val
and it should work. Howev
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 29/01/2015 21:32, alb wrote:
>>
>> Hi MRAB,
>>
>> MRAB wrote:
>> []
>
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> debian@debian:example$ python3 export_latex.py doctree.csv
>File "export_latex.py", line 36
> yield from ch
On 29/01/2015 21:32, alb wrote:
Hi MRAB,
MRAB wrote:
[]
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
debian@debian:example$ python3 export_latex.py doctree.csv
File "export_latex.py", line 36
yield from child.show2()
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
and I've tried with both python and pyth
Hi MRAB,
MRAB wrote:
[]
>>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>> debian@debian:example$ python3 export_latex.py doctree.csv
>>> File "export_latex.py", line 36
>>> yield from child.show2()
>>> ^
>>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>
>> and I've tried with both python and python3 (see b
Hi Tim,
Tim Chase wrote:
[]
>> I know about the xlrd module to get data from excel
>
> If I have to get my code to read Excel files, xlrd is usually my
> first and only stop.
>
It provides quite a good interface to manipulating excel files and I
find it pretty easy even for my entry level!
>
On 2015-01-29 21:02, alb wrote:
Hi Peter,
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
[]
def show2(self):
yield str(self)
for child in self.children:
yield from child.show2()
here is what I get:
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
debian@debian:example$ python3 export_latex.py
Hi Peter,
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
[]
>def show2(self):
>yield str(self)
>for child in self.children:
>yield from child.show2()
here is what I get:
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> debian@debian:example$ python3 export_latex.py doctree.csv
> File "e
On 2015-01-28 10:12, alb wrote:
> I've a document structure which is extremely simple and represented
> on a spreadsheet in the following way (a made up example):
>
> subsystem | chapter | section | subsection | subsubsec |
> A | | || |
> | f
Hi Peter,
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
[]
> You can save the excel sheet as csv so that you an use the csv module which
> may be easier to use than xlrd. The rest should be doable by hand. Here's
> what I hacked together:
>
> $ cat parse_column_tree.py
> import csv
>
> def column_inde
alb wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've a document structure which is extremely simple and represented on a
> spreadsheet in the following way (a made up example):
>
> subsystem | chapter | section | subsection | subsubsec |
> A | | || |
> | fun
Hi everyone,
I've a document structure which is extremely simple and represented on a
spreadsheet in the following way (a made up example):
subsystem | chapter | section | subsection | subsubsec |
A | | || |
| func0 | |
18 matches
Mail list logo
