Re: finding out the call (and not only the caller)

2007-10-28 Thread Carl Friedrich Bolz
Hi Neal, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The code doesn't handle all the cases (e.g., nested functions), but > gives you an idea of what can be done and where to look for the info > (ie, in the stack frame and how to parse the byte codes to some > extent). For nested functions, look in co_consts. > >

Re: finding out the call (and not only the caller)

2007-10-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 7, 2:47 pm, "Francesco Guerrieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Today I've been thinking a bit about the "python internals". Inspired > by this recipe:http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/66062 > I found out a little problem which haven't been able to solve. > In sh

finding out the call (and not only the caller)

2007-10-07 Thread Francesco Guerrieri
Hi, Today I've been thinking a bit about the "python internals". Inspired by this recipe: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/66062 I found out a little problem which haven't been able to solve. In short, is there a way to find out how a given name lookup was started? It is not