Re: Launching Helium: A Selenium wrapper that makes web automation 50% easier

On Monday, December 16, 2013 12:40:56 PM UTC+1, larry@gmail.com wrote: ... > Is this open source? No. We quit our daytime jobs to work on this project and need the income to sustain our development... -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Launching Helium: A Selenium wrapper that makes web automation 50% easier

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Michael Herrmann wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm working for a startup called BugFree Software and would like to announce > that today we're launching our second product! > > Helium is a library that wraps around Selenium to simplify web

Launching Helium: A Selenium wrapper that makes web automation 50% easier

Hi everyone, I'm working for a startup called BugFree Software and would like to announce that today we're launching our second product! Helium is a library that wraps around Selenium to simplify web automation. It does away with many of the technicalities involved with web scri

Re: best set of modules for web automation without javascript

bined with HTMLTestRunner you can get beautiful test reports. On Feb 13, 8:01 pm, Matias Surdi wrote: > You should give a look to Selenium. It's great. > > http://www.openqa.org > > > > News123 wrote: > > Hi, > > > I'd like to do some web automa

Re: best set of modules for web automation without javascript

You should have a look at twill: http://twill.idyll.org It seems to be no longer maintained, but will probably do most of what you expect. And it is built on top of mechanize. On Feb 13, 4:04 pm, News123 wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to do some web automation with python 2.5 &g

Re: best set of modules for web automation without javascript

You should give a look to Selenium. It's great. http://www.openqa.org News123 wrote: Hi, I'd like to do some web automation with python 2.5 - https: - a cookiejar - some forms to be filled in what is the best set of modules. As far as I understood, there is httplib, but it s

Re: best set of modules for web automation without javascript

hat could be modified and posted. > > > bye > > N > > > > Joe Riopel wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:04 AM, News123 wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I'd like to do some web automation with python 2.5 >>> - https: >>> - a cookieja

Re: best set of modules for web automation without javascript

News123 writes: > I would just like to retrieve all the field names and default values of > a form. (Some forms are huge) and wondered thus whether there's already > a python module parsing a html documents for forms , form fields and > field vaules, returning an objcet. that could be modified and

Re: best set of modules for web automation without javascript

News123 wrote: I would just like to retrieve all the field names and default values of a form. (Some forms are huge) and wondered thus whether there's already a python module parsing a html documents for forms , form fields and field vaules, returning an objcet. that could be modified and posted

Re: best set of modules for web automation without javascript

ments for forms , form fields and field vaules, returning an objcet. that could be modified and posted. bye N Joe Riopel wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:04 AM, News123 wrote: >> Hi, >> I'd like to do some web automation with python 2.5 >> - https: >> - a cook

Re: best set of modules for web automation without javascript

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:04 AM, News123 wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to do some web automation with python 2.5 > - https: > - a cookiejar > - some forms to be filled in > what is the best set of modules. I have automated some testing of our product, using it's web UI

best set of modules for web automation without javascript

Hi, I'd like to do some web automation with python 2.5 - https: - a cookiejar - some forms to be filled in what is the best set of modules. As far as I understood, there is httplib, but it seems (if I understood well) to be incoompatible with cookielib I'm a newcomer to webautom

Re: Web automation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi Mike, > thank you very much for your reply. > I know that mine could be considered >> a "very" silly way to define automation. > but I'm not a purist nor a professional > programmer. Yes, but you still need to communicate with other people. Using words to mean someth

Re: Web automation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > While I was posting the reply to Mike I saw the last > contribution of Paul Boddie. > > From what he says I infer that he is a Windows programmer Far from it! OutlookExplorer was written as an experiment when I had to use Windows in a corporate environment. I don't run W

Re: Web automation

Hi Mike, thank you very much for your reply. I know that mine could be considered > a "very" silly way to define automation. but I'm not a purist nor a professional programmer. Besides that, I know that case by case every problem can be solved and in more "right" way, also in very difficult environ

Re: Web automation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The contribution of Paul Boddie is valuable. I too examined DCOP > and even chose as browser Konqueror, being a KDE application. > But DCOP doesn't go to such a low level. It is not possible > to send a simulated keystroke from one KDE application to another. I imagine t

Re: Web automation

to be a real problem. Especially since you may not be able to run the proprietary plugins on your system anyway, so even a full-blown browser won't help :-(. For JavaScript - there are standalone implementations available. If I ever run into a case where I actually have to run JavaScrip

Re: Web automation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > answering to Mike Meyer who replied to the following > assertion on my part: > >> but I supposed the everyone knew that web automation > >> (and in general "automation") is only a problem in Linux. > with...: >> I don't

Re: Web automation

Hi all, answering to Mike Meyer who replied to the following assertion on my part: >> but I supposed the everyone knew that web automation >> (and in general "automation") is only a problem in Linux. with...: > I don't know it. I don't believe it, either. I a

Re: Web automation

Mike Meyer wrote: > "Paul Boddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The problem on non-Windows systems is the lack of a common (or > > enforced) technology for exposing application object models > > OS X has AppleScript. VM/CMS has Rexx. The Amiga had ARexx when MS was > still peddling DOS. Plan 9 ha

Re: Web automation

"Paul Boddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mike Meyer wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> > but I supposed the everyone knew that web automation (and in general >> > "automation") is only a problem in Linux. >> I don't know

Re: Web automation

Mike Meyer wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > but I supposed the everyone knew that web automation (and in general > > "automation") is only a problem in Linux. > > I don't know it. I don't believe it, either. I automate web tasks on > Unix systems (

Re: Web automation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > but I supposed the everyone knew that web automation (and in general > "automation") is only a problem in Linux. I don't know it. I don't believe it, either. I automate web tasks on Unix systems (I don't use many Linux systems, but it&#x

Re: Web automation (was: Pressing a Webpage Button)

le controls from where the query arrives... I must thank calfdog for his reply, but the tool he suggest (pamie) is only working in Windows and with the browser Internet Explorer. I didn't explicity refer to Linux, but I supposed the everyone knew that web automation (and in general "automat

Re: Web automation with twill

Hi Michele, I only made the observation about Zope, because I hoped to hear a different point of view as you are/were involved in web development using Zope/Plone (as referred in your article...). Besides that, at a Linux Day, I followed a presentation of Zope/Plone framework, which stroke me a lot

Re: Web automation with twill

qwwwee: > By the way, are you aware that C. Titus Brown (twill's author) > tells "peste e corna" of Zope? No, but I am not surprised. I also say "peste e corna" of Zope ;) In general I am an anti-frameworks guy (in good company with many Pythonistas including Guido). Michele Simionato

Re: Web automation with twill

ernet your contributions because I hardly read the first 10 hits of a search. I need web automation also for that (in order to elaborate more search results reducing then my help requests and mainly my useless posts). By the way, are you aware that C. Titus Brown (twill's author) tells "pe

Re: Web automation with twill

BTW, O'Reilly just published an article of mines on twill: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/python/2005/11/03/twill.html Michele Simionato -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Web automation (was: Pressing a Webpage Button)

Twill or Pamie looks good, if your looking for a solution using Python. If you are looking for Cross- browser solution for testing there is also selenium that does that. The have some code for use in Python. There is also WATIR in RUBY and SAMIE in PERL It depends on your enviroment and needs.

Re: Web automation (was: Pressing a Webpage Button)

Twill or Pamie looks good, if your looking for a solution using Python. If you are looking for Cross- browser solution for testing there is also selenium that does that. The have some code for use in Python. There is also WATIR in RUBY and SAMIE in PERL It depends on your enviroment and needs.

Re: Web automation (was: Pressing a Webpage Button)

L with that. I searched > > google but no luck. > > > For example, google has a button how would i make a script to press that button? > > I have a similar target: web automation, which > needs not only to press web buttons but also > fill up input fields (like in your c

Web automation (was: Pressing a Webpage Button)

n? I have a similar target: web automation, which needs not only to press web buttons but also fill up input fields (like in your case the search field of Google). On the suggestion of [EMAIL PROTECTED], I tried twill (http://www.idyll.org/~t/www-tools/twill.html). I think it can be the solutio

Re: Web automation with twill

I solved the problem by myself with the classical method of newbyes (trial and error). Bye. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Web automation with twill

You might want to post your question to the twill mailing list. Info about the list is available at Grig -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Web automation with twill

had solved "by hand" clicking 220 times on a button and saving the data sent by the server (it is an "asp" file). In this case web automation is needed! I need the help of some expert or of the author (Titus Brown). The asp file is (I am Italian!): http://www.sc

Re: Using win32com for web automation

> "calfdog" == calfdog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: calfdog> ina wrote: >> Look up pamie it should do all the work you need. If it dosn't >> I can send you ishyBrowser but pamie has more comunity support. calfdog> # wait for the document to fully load calfdog> while ie.R

Re: Using win32com for web automation

ina wrote: > Look up pamie it should do all the work you need. If it dosn't I can > send you ishyBrowser but pamie has more comunity support. FYI #Imports from win32com.client import Dispatch from time import sleep # Create a new browser object ie = Dispatch('InternetExplorer.App­lication') #

Re: Using win32com for web automation

> from win32com.client import Dispatch > from time import sleep > > ie = Dispatch('InternetExplorer.Application') > ie.Visible = 1 > ie.Navigate("http://ispds-sepsr.prv:7500/cs/welcome.jsp";) > > while ie.ReadyState != 4: > sleep(1) > > doc = ie.Document > > while doc.readyState != "complete":

Re: Using win32com for web automation

Look up pamie it should do all the work you need. If it dosn't I can send you ishyBrowser but pamie has more comunity support. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Using win32com for web automation

For Javascript automation, I recommend Selenium (). Grig -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Using win32com for web automation

Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to submit javascript forms using win32com in order to complete repetitive processes. The Webpage Source: (I tried to include only the important stuff) -- function mainPageOnLoad() { initLogin(); setEnterToSub