[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In comp.lang.perl.misc John Bokma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm talking about using the technology for communication, instead of
>> > reinventing the wheel with crappy web forums.
>>
>> What is exactly crappy about those forums?
>>
> They are slow
I have
In comp.lang.perl.misc John Bokma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm talking about using the technology for communication, instead of
> > reinventing the wheel with crappy web forums.
>
> What is exactly crappy about those forums?
>
They are slow
They are inflexible
They are slow
They do
Ulrich Hobelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Bokma wrote:
>> Ulrich Hobelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On the information side (in contrast to the discussion side) RSS is
>>> replacing Usenet,
>>
>> LOL, how? I can't post to RSS feeds. Or do you mean for lurkers?
>
> I said "inf
John Bokma wrote:
> Ulrich Hobelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On the information side (in contrast to the discussion side) RSS is
>> replacing Usenet,
>
> LOL, how? I can't post to RSS feeds. Or do you mean for lurkers?
I said "information side", meaning stuff like RSS is used for.
>> T
Ulrich Hobelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the information side (in contrast to the discussion side) RSS is
> replacing Usenet,
LOL, how? I can't post to RSS feeds. Or do you mean for lurkers?
> There is no real reason why NNTP couldn't be used like RSS (i.e.
> contain a small description
