On Apr 2, 10:13 am, Thomas Dimson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess my real question is: why does wrapping the call to be
> "call=lambda x: DecorateMe.callMe(x)" somehow fix the issue with this
> temporary namespace? It seems strange to me that defining an
> additional function (through lambda
On Apr 2, 7:30 am, Thomas Dimson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Originally I posted this as a bug but it was shot down pretty quickly.
> I am still mildly curious about this as I'm missing a bit of
> understanding of Python here. Why is it that the following code
> snippet:
>
> def decorat
On Apr 2, 10:31 am, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 2, 8:30 am, Thomas Dimson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > Originally I posted this as a bug but it was shot down pretty quickly.
> > I am still mildly curious about this as I'm missing a bit of
> > understan
On Apr 2, 8:30 am, Thomas Dimson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Originally I posted this as a bug but it was shot down pretty quickly.
> I am still mildly curious about this as I'm missing a bit of
> understanding of Python here. Why is it that the following code
> snippet:
>
> def decora
Hello,
Originally I posted this as a bug but it was shot down pretty quickly.
I am still mildly curious about this as I'm missing a bit of
understanding of Python here. Why is it that the following code
snippet:
def decorator( call ):
def inner(func):
def application( *args, **kwargs
