Paul Rubin wrote:
> Carl Cerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>3. Not as fast as byte code hacks, or using pyrex/psyco. Peter Hansen
>>is right. One of those is likely a better solution if you don't need
>>pure python.
>
>
> If you don't need pure python than your approach still beats
> everyt
Carl Cerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 3. Not as fast as byte code hacks, or using pyrex/psyco. Peter Hansen
> is right. One of those is likely a better solution if you don't need
> pure python.
If you don't need pure python than your approach still beats
everything else. Just generate C code
