Carl Cerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 3. Not as fast as byte code hacks, or using pyrex/psyco. Peter Hansen > is right. One of those is likely a better solution if you don't need > pure python.
If you don't need pure python than your approach still beats everything else. Just generate C code (or assembly code) instead of Python. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
