On Aug 26, 12:19 pm, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 01:41 am, a...@pythoncraft.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article
> >,
> >Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> >>On Aug 24, 6:34=A0am, Sebastian Wiesner wrote:
>
> >>>In any case, there is bottle [1], which provides a *very minimal*
> >>>framewo=
> >>r
On 01:41 am, a...@pythoncraft.com wrote:
In article
,
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On Aug 24, 6:34=A0am, Sebastian Wiesner wrote:
In any case, there is bottle [1], which provides a *very minimal*
framewo=
rk
for WSGI web development. =A0Don't expect too much, it is really
small, a=
nd
does
In article ,
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>On Aug 24, 6:34=A0am, Sebastian Wiesner wrote:
>>
>> In any case, there is bottle [1], which provides a *very minimal* framewo=
>rk
>> for WSGI web development. =A0Don't expect too much, it is really small, a=
>nd
>> doesn't do much more than routing and mi
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:32:09 -0400, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> What's different about Python 3 is that there is only unicode strings,
> whereas Python 2 has a string type and a unicode type.
Python 2 has "str" (char) and "unicode" (wchar) types.
Python 3 has "bytes" (char) and "str" (wchar) types.
On Aug 24, 6:34 am, Sebastian Wiesner wrote:
> At Sunday 23 August 2009 22:13:16 you wrote:> I use Chinese and therefore
> Unicode very heavily, and so Python 3 is
> > an unavoidable choice for me.
>
> Python 2.x supports Unicode just as well as Python 3. Every common web
> framework works perfe
David Prager Branner wrote:
> I use Chinese and therefore Unicode very heavily, and so Python 3 is
> an unavoidable choice for me.
As others noted before, this statement is not true by itself.
> But I'm frustrated by the fact that
> Django, Pylons, and TurboGears do not support Python 3 yet and
At Sunday 23 August 2009 22:13:16 you wrote:
> I use Chinese and therefore Unicode very heavily, and so Python 3 is
> an unavoidable choice for me.
Python 2.x supports Unicode just as well as Python 3. Every common web
framework works perfectly with unicode.
In any case, there is bottle [1], whi
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 13:13 -0700, David Prager Branner wrote:
> I use Chinese and therefore Unicode very heavily, and so Python 3 is
> an unavoidable choice for me. But I'm frustrated by the fact that
> Django, Pylons, and TurboGears do not support Python 3 yet and
> (according to their developmen
