In article <e9b627c8-eb88-4312-8777-1b0064186...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Aug 24, 6:34=A0am, Sebastian Wiesner <basti.wies...@gmx.net> wrote: >> >> In any case, there is bottle [1], which provides a *very minimal* framewo= >rk >> for WSGI web development. =A0Don't expect too much, it is really small, a= >nd >> doesn't do much more than routing and minimal templating. >> >> However, it is the only Python-3-compatible web framework I know of. >> >> [1]http://bottle.paws.de/page/start > >There is one big flaw with your claim. That is the there is no WSGI >specification for Python 3.0 as yet. Anything that claims to work with >WSGI and Python 3.0 is just a big guess as far as how WSGI for Python >3.0 may work.
Perhaps you meant "library" instead of "specification"? I don't understand how a language can be missing a specification. -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "I support family values -- Addams family values" --www.nancybuttons.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
