>> http://norvig.com/sudoku.html
(...)
> Below is the "winner" of my hacking for an as fast as
> possible 110% pure python (no imports at all!) comprehensive sudoku
> solver under 50 LOCs, back in 2006. Performance is comparable to the
> solver you advertize - numbers are slightly better, but
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:09:42 +0100
Thomas Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neither fast nor user friendly, but very concise:
This is a bit faster:
options = set([str(i) for i in range(1, 10)])
def allow(puzzle,i):
exclude = set(x if i//9 == j//9 or i%9 == j%9
or i//27 == j//27 an
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:02:01 -0800 (PST), Derek Marshall wrote:
> This is just for fun, in case someone would be interested and because
> I haven't had the pleasure of posting anything here in many years ...
>
> http://derek.marshall.googlepages.com/pythonsudokusolver
>
> Appreciate any fee
Shawn Milochik wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Derek Marshall wrote:
>
>> This is just for fun, in case someone would be interested and because
>> I haven't had the pleasure of posting anything here in many years ...
>>
>> http://derek.marshall.googlepages.com/pythonsudokusolver
>>
>> A
Derek Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is just for fun, in case someone would be interested and because
>I haven't had the pleasure of posting anything here in many years ...
>
> http://derek.marshall.googlepages.com/pythonsudokusolver
>
>Appreciate any feedback anyone who takes the
On Jan 23, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Derek Marshall wrote:
> This is just for fun, in case someone would be interested and because
> I haven't had the pleasure of posting anything here in many years ...
>
> http://derek.marshall.googlepages.com/pythonsudokusolver
>
> Appreciate any feedback anyone w
