Re: Setup-tools

2023-07-16 Thread Mats Wichmann via Python-list
On 7/15/23 12:56, MRAB via Python-list wrote: On 2023-07-15 07:12, YOUSEF EZZAT via Python-list wrote: Hey!. i face a problem when i get setup packages by pip when i code this : "pip install numpy" in my command line it gives me error "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'" ple

Re: Setup-tools

2023-07-15 Thread MRAB via Python-list
On 2023-07-15 07:12, YOUSEF EZZAT via Python-list wrote: Hey!. i face a problem when i get setup packages by pip when i code this : "pip install numpy" in my command line it gives me error "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'" please, i need help for solving this problem

Re: setup

2016-03-26 Thread eryk sun
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Joel Goldstick wrote: > I'm guessing you are on windows and you could google the error code, but > also search the list because this question has been asked and answered I > believe A little knowledge helps. An upper word of 0x8007 indicates a COM HRESULT error (0

Re: setup

2016-03-26 Thread Joel Goldstick
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Youssef Ghorab wrote: > dear python,i'm having a problem when i'm setting up the program > 0x80070570 problem > if you please could give me any advice will be cool. > thanks in advance > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > I'm guessing you

Re: setup failed

2016-02-08 Thread Mark Summerfield
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 10:50:19 AM UTC, Mark Summerfield wrote: > If you need 32-bit Python on Windows my advice is to install 3.4. If you need > 32-bit and 64-bit Python on Windows, then I think it will only work with 3.4 > (or older), but not with 3.5's new installer. > > I have tried

Re: setup failed

2016-02-08 Thread Mark Summerfield
If you need 32-bit Python on Windows my advice is to install 3.4. If you need 32-bit and 64-bit Python on Windows, then I think it will only work with 3.4 (or older), but not with 3.5's new installer. I have tried installing 3.5.0 and 3.5.1 on several machines both 32- and 64-bit Windows. The 3

Re: setup failed

2016-02-08 Thread Mike S via Python-list
On 2/4/2016 4:39 AM, Prince Thomas wrote: Hi I am an computer science engineer. I downloaded the python version 3.5.1.amd64 and just python 3.5.1. The problem is when I install the program setup is failed and showing 0*80070570-The file or directory is corrupted and unreadable. I install the n

Re: setup(**config); rookie

2012-05-28 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Mon, 28 May 2012 06:20:06 -0700, cate wrote: > setup(**config) > > What is the construct **? It expands the dict "config" into keyword arguments. A single * expands to positional arguments. A simple example: args = [1, 2, 3] kwargs = {'x': 4, 'y': 5} somefunc(*args, **kwargs) is expande

Re: setup(**config); rookie

2012-05-28 Thread Jean-Michel Pichavant
cate wrote: I going thru a 101 and came upon this (http:// learnpythonthehardway.org/book/ex46.html) try: from setuptools import setup except ImportError: from distutils.core import setup config = { 'description': 'My Project', 'author': 'My Name', 'url': 'URL to get it at.'

Re: setup(**config); rookie

2012-05-28 Thread Roy Smith
In article , cate wrote: > I going thru a 101 and came upon this (http:// > learnpythonthehardway.org/book/ex46.html) > > try: > from setuptools import setup > except ImportError: > from distutils.core import setup > > config = { > 'description': 'My Project', > 'author': 'My

Re: setup server from scratch (with or without apache?)

2010-06-21 Thread News123
Hi Kruptein, Kruptein wrote: > I think that apache and mod_python are good enough, but I'm not an > expert. > > but I think that the security aspect for a large part depends on how > secure your code is. > > You can have a very secure server setting, but somewhere a bug in your > code that makes

Re: setup server from scratch (with or without apache?)

2010-06-21 Thread News123
News123 wrote: > Hi, > > > So far I never really had to ask this question and this is also, why I > am stil a little shaky on this topic: > > So far the typical LAMP server existed already and contained already a > lot of existing PHP web applications, which I couldn't remove. > Therefore I just us

Re: setup server from scratch (with or without apache?)

2010-06-21 Thread Christian Heimes
> I will only have one IP address and only port 443. > > 1.) What alternatives would exist compared to apache / mod_python You can use a combination of mod_proxy and mod_rewrite to set up a forwarding proxy in your Apache server. Let Apache deal with SSL, virtual hosting etc. Then bind your appli

Re: setup server from scratch (with or without apache?)

2010-06-21 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers
News123 a écrit : Hi, So far I never really had to ask this question and this is also, why I am stil a little shaky on this topic: So far the typical LAMP server existed already and contained already a lot of existing PHP web applications, which I couldn't remove. Therefore I just used mod_pyt

Re: setup server from scratch (with or without apache?)

2010-06-20 Thread Stefan Behnel
News123, 20.06.2010 13:12: Now I have the opportunity to setup a server from scratch. 90% of the content will be non visual content over https with client AND server certificates. Access privileges will depend on the client certificate. I will only have one IP address and only port 443. 1.) Wha

Re: setup server from scratch (with or without apache?)

2010-06-20 Thread alex23
Paul Rubin wrote: > mod_python is pretty dead. It's now totally dead[1]. (Not pining for the fjords, either.) 1: http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/06/modpython-project-is-now-officially.html -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: setup server from scratch (with or without apache?)

2010-06-20 Thread Paul Rubin
News123 writes: > 1.) What alternatives would exist compared to apache / mod_python I think you could use stunnel to listen on port 443 and forward it to a local port, where you'd have a python httpd, perhaps using the SimpleHTTPServer module. Stunnel uses OpenSSL which handles client certificat

Re: setup server from scratch (with or without apache?)

2010-06-20 Thread Kruptein
I think that apache and mod_python are good enough, but I'm not an expert. but I think that the security aspect for a large part depends on how secure your code is. You can have a very secure server setting, but somewhere a bug in your code that makes it insecure. -- http://mail.python.org/mailm

Re: Setup global variables settings for the entire applications

2010-05-16 Thread Chris Rebert
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:32 AM, AON LAZIO wrote: > Hi, >    Say I have an application which requires a global settings for the user. > When the user finishes setting those global variables for the app. Any class > can use that variables (which are the same for all), something like that. > What is

Re: SetUp functions for multiple test cases

2009-01-20 Thread brooklineTom
On Jan 20, 9:57 am, Roy Smith wrote: > In article > <45b0bf56-673c-40cd-a27a-62f9943d9...@r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com>, > Georg Schmid wrote: > > > I've just started working with unittests and already hit a snag. I > > couldn't find out how to implement a setup function, that is executed > > on

Re: SetUp functions for multiple test cases

2009-01-20 Thread Duncan Booth
Roy Smith wrote: > You might have your setUp() method re-assign the global to an instance > variable and then your test cases can access it via self.whatever. > The reason for that is if at some point in the future you change your > mind and decide to re-build the database in setUp() for each te

Re: SetUp functions for multiple test cases

2009-01-20 Thread Georg Schmid
On Jan 20, 3:57 pm, Roy Smith wrote: > In article > <45b0bf56-673c-40cd-a27a-62f9943d9...@r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com>, >  Georg Schmid wrote: > > > I've just started working with unittests and already hit a snag. I > > couldn't find out how to implement a setup function, that is executed > > on

Re: SetUp functions for multiple test cases

2009-01-20 Thread Roy Smith
In article <45b0bf56-673c-40cd-a27a-62f9943d9...@r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com>, Georg Schmid wrote: > I've just started working with unittests and already hit a snag. I > couldn't find out how to implement a setup function, that is executed > only _once_ before all of the tests. Specifically, I

Re: SetUp functions for multiple test cases

2009-01-20 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
Georg Schmid wrote: > I've just started working with unittests and already hit a snag. I > couldn't find out how to implement a setup function, that is executed > only _once_ before all of the tests. Specifically, I need this for > testing my database interface, and naturally I don't want to creat

Re: setup() and C extensions

2007-04-10 Thread Carsten Haese
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 23:35 -0700, 7stud wrote: > 2) When returning None, why use the idiom: > > Py_INCREF(Py_None); > return Py_None; > > instead of: > > return Py_BuildValue(""); > As Gabriel said, the preferred idiom is faster and clearer. Sufficiently recent Pythons define the macro Py_RET

Re: setup() and C extensions

2007-04-10 Thread Gabriel Genellina
En Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:35:35 -0300, 7stud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > 1) When you create a C array to map python names to the C functions > that you defined: > > static PyMethodDef MyFunctions[] = > { > {"my_calc", (PyCFunction)my_func, METH_VARARGS, "my very speedy c > function"}, >

Re: setup() and C extensions

2007-04-10 Thread Gabriel Genellina
En Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:02:22 -0300, 7stud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > I can't find any documentation on the setup() function in the > distutils.core module; specifically I want to know what the 'name' > argument does. In some examples in the python docs, they use the name > argument like th

Re: setup() and C extensions

2007-04-09 Thread 7stud
Also: 1) When you create a C array to map python names to the C functions that you defined: static PyMethodDef MyFunctions[] = { {"my_calc", (PyCFunction)my_func, METH_VARARGS, "my very speedy c function"}, {NULL, NULL, 0, NULL} }; Why do you need to cast my_func to PyCFunction? 2) Whe

Re: SETUP - Introducing "setuptools" to a project without risk

2006-09-20 Thread Ilias Lazaridis
Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > If I understood things right, setuptools extends the functionality of > distutils > > Thus replacing within a setup.py: > > from distutils.core import setup > > with > > try: > from setuptools import setup > except ImportError: > from distutils.core import setup > >

Re: setup distributed computing for two computer only

2005-04-05 Thread Heiko Wundram
Am Dienstag, 5. April 2005 11:22 schrieb Irmen de Jong: > > Python Remote Objects > > ^^^ what Heiko said :) *biggrin* -- --- Heiko. listening to: Tool - Lateralus - 1 The Grudge.mp3 see you at: http://www.stud.mh-hannover.de/~hwundram/wordpress/ pgpKv3ALoPbZi.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: setup distributed computing for two computer only

2005-04-05 Thread Irmen de Jong
Heiko Wundram wrote: Am Montag, 4. April 2005 21:27 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Google for: Python Remote Objects ^^^ what Heiko said :) This is, assuming that the 'function' on the other computer is implemented in Python too. --Irmen -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: setup distributed computing for two computer only

2005-04-04 Thread Heiko Wundram
Am Montag, 4. April 2005 21:27 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Google for: Python Remote Objects or Python XMLRPC -- --- Heiko. listening to: Nine Inch Nails - The Downward Spiral see you at: http://www.stud.mh-hannover.de/~hwundram/wordpress/ pgpbsPKhjKOEY.pgp Description: PGP signature --

Re: setup distributed computing for two computer only

2005-04-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, There are two computer. For example one computer ask other computer to run function, procedure or object then receive the result. I want to know about what should I do to setup such system and what software I need to implement it. Sincerely Yours, Pujo -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/

Re: setup distributed computing for two computer only

2005-04-04 Thread Irmen de Jong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there any one who has experiance about how to setup distributed > computing for 2 computer only. I really want to know from the start. > Any suggestion appreciated. Please be more specific about "distributed computing"... --Irmen -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/li