In article , Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de>
wrote:
> Ned Deily wrote:
> > Keep in mind that the Python readline module may be linked to either the
> > GPL-licensed GNU readline or the BSD-licensed editline (libedit) library
> > (the default on newer OS X systems and probably on *BSD systems) and
>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Dwight Hutto wrote:
>
> I knew I'd eventually regret putting "on topic" into the subject...
I didn't write that. If you're referring to OT, it means Off Topic,
and a response would be appreciated. And you can call me David,
Dwight Hutto wrote:
I knew I'd eventually regret putting "on topic" into the subject...
Well done, Dwight.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:30:01 +0200, Peter Otten wrote:
>
>> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>>> I'm working with the readline module, and I'm trying to set a key
>>> combination to process the current command line by calling a known
>>> function,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:20:24 +0100, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 10/16/12 12:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Well, I was hoping for a pure Python solution, rather than having to
>> troll through who knows how many thousands of lines of code in a
>> language I can barely read.
>
> Are you confusing I
On 10/16/12 12:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:30:01 +0200, Peter Otten wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I'm working with the readline module, and I'm trying to set a key
combination to process the current command line by calling a known
function, *and* enter the command lin
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:30:01 +0200, Peter Otten wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> I'm working with the readline module, and I'm trying to set a key
>> combination to process the current command line by calling a known
>> function, *and* enter the command line.
>>
>> Something along the lines
Ned Deily wrote:
> In article , Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de>
> wrote:
>> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> > I'm working with the readline module, and I'm trying to set a key
>> > combination to process the current command line by calling a known
>> > function, *and* enter the command line.
> [...]
>> A
In article , Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de>
wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > I'm working with the readline module, and I'm trying to set a key
> > combination to process the current command line by calling a known
> > function, *and* enter the command line.
[...]
> Anyway, here's what I came u
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm working with the readline module, and I'm trying to set a key
> combination to process the current command line by calling a known
> function, *and* enter the command line.
>
> Something along the lines of:
>
> * execute function spam() in some context where it can a
On 13/10/2012 23:52, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 13/10/2012 23:26, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 13 October 2012 23:13, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 13/10/2012 22:31, Joshua Landau wrote:
With two irritants (including 8), is it not advisable that
python-list
gets an admin to block these accounts? Eve
On 13/10/2012 23:26, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 13 October 2012 23:13, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 13/10/2012 22:31, Joshua Landau wrote:
With two irritants (including 8), is it not advisable that python-list
gets an admin to block these accounts? Even if it does nothing more than
slow them, t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Joshua Landau
wrote:
> On 13 October 2012 22:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Joshua Landau
>> wrote:
>> > With two irritants (including 8), is it not advisable that
>> > python-list
>> > gets an admin to block these accounts?
On 13 October 2012 23:13, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 13/10/2012 22:31, Joshua Landau wrote:
>
>>
>> With two irritants (including 8), is it not advisable that python-list
>> gets an admin to block these accounts? Even if it does nothing more than
>> slow them, that's something.
>>
>>
> Most ir
On 13 October 2012 22:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Joshua Landau
> wrote:
> > With two irritants (including 8), is it not advisable that
> python-list
> > gets an admin to block these accounts? Even if it does nothing more than
> > slow them, that's something.
On 13/10/2012 22:31, Joshua Landau wrote:
With two irritants (including 8), is it not advisable that python-list
gets an admin to block these accounts? Even if it does nothing more than
slow them, that's something.
Most irritants are mere amateurs compared to Ilias Lazaridis. I wonder
i
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Joshua Landau
wrote:
> With two irritants (including 8), is it not advisable that python-list
> gets an admin to block these accounts? Even if it does nothing more than
> slow them, that's something.
That's what killfiles are for. You have two options:
http:/
On 13 October 2012 22:14, Roel Schroeven wrote:
> Etienne Robillard schreef:
>
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:47:52 +1100
>> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> Excuse me?
>>>
>>> I'm not overly familiar with readline, so perhaps there is a really
>>> obvious way to do what Steven's trying to do, but this p
Etienne Robillard schreef:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:47:52 +1100
Chris Angelico wrote:
Excuse me?
I'm not overly familiar with readline, so perhaps there is a really
obvious way to do what Steven's trying to do, but this post does not
appear to be the result of a lack of thinking.
If it really
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:47:52 +1100
Chris Angelico wrote:
> Excuse me?
>
> I'm not overly familiar with readline, so perhaps there is a really
> obvious way to do what Steven's trying to do, but this post does not
> appear to be the result of a lack of thinking.
>
> If it really IS that obvious
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Etienne Robillard
wrote:
> Why dont you grow yourself some usable neurons instead ? Don't you realize
> now stackoverflow.com is starting
> to hurt your capacity to cogitate on your own or have you not realized this
> yet?
Excuse me?
I'm not overly familiar wi
On 13 Oct 2012 13:30:14 GMT
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm working with the readline module, and I'm trying to set a key
> combination to process the current command line by calling a known
> function, *and* enter the command line.
>
> Something along the lines of:
>
> * execute function spam()
22 matches
Mail list logo
