On 13 October 2012 22:14, Roel Schroeven <r...@roelschroeven.net> wrote:
> Etienne Robillard schreef: > > On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:47:52 +1100 >> Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Excuse me? >>> >>> I'm not overly familiar with readline, so perhaps there is a really >>> obvious way to do what Steven's trying to do, but this post does not >>> appear to be the result of a lack of thinking. >>> >>> If it really IS that obvious to you, post a link to appropriate >>> documentation without the rudeness... that way it'll be useful to >>> everyone, not just cathartic to you. >>> >>> ChrisA >>> -- >>> http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-list<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list> >>> >> >> whatever. i don't feel much like replying to idiots today >> > > Then simply don't. Much better then replying in such a rude way. > > I leave the question of who is being an idiot here as an exercise to the > reader. I've not seen Etienne Robillard much before, so I think he's relatively new. He appeared first, I think, two months ago with one post about how "english" a word was, and then last month and this he'd done nothing but try and weasel money from people and offend them. *We just need to ignore him and warn newcomers*, similarly to how we deal with 88888 Dihedral (a bot, btw). So, yes, that's a purposeful troll. Note, Etienne Robillard, that if you reply to me I will not respond. That applies to more than this thread. I hope others do the same, and that newcomers *are* warned. With two irritants (including 88888), is it not advisable that python-list gets an admin to block these accounts? Even if it does nothing more than slow them, that's something.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
