"Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are aware that it is only one character more to type?
I'm not arguing for print vs. print(), but I do want to comment on the
"character count" argument.
I'm a pretty good typist, the result of having been forced in junior high
school (in the
Lie schrieb:
> On Apr 13, 7:23 pm, Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In article
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>
>> Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I wish py3k
>>> would make it an option whether to treat print as statement or
>>> function though.
>> Arrrggh! No, don't even go there. If
On Apr 13, 7:23 pm, Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wish py3k
> > would make it an option whether to treat print as statement or
> > function though.
>
> Arrrggh! No, don't even go there. If you want optional
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wish py3k
> would make it an option whether to treat print as statement or
> function though.
Arrrggh! No, don't even go there. If you want optional parens, use
Perl :-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
On Apr 11, 7:26 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>
> > Am I the only one that thinks this would be useful? :)
>
> > I'd really like to be able to use python 3.0's print statement in
> > 2.x.
>
>
> FWIW, the whole point is that in 3.0, print stop being a statement to
>
On Apr 10, 3:06 pm, "Andrii V. Mishkovskyi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/4/10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Am I the only one that thinks this would be useful? :)
>
> > I'd really like to be able to use python 3.0'sprintstatement in
> > 2.x. Is this at least being considere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Am I the only one that thinks this would be useful? :)
>
> I'd really like to be able to use python 3.0's print statement in
> 2.x.
FWIW, the whole point is that in 3.0, print stop being a statement to
become a function...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listi
2008/4/10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am I the only one that thinks this would be useful? :)
>
> I'd really like to be able to use python 3.0's print statement in
> 2.x. Is this at least being considered as an option for 2.6? It
> seems like it would be helpful with transitionin
