On Jun 3, 1:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Jun 2, 12:41 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 2, 7:15 pm, Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here are benchmarks for FreeBSD 6.2, amd64
>
> > packet_size x y
> > 0499.57 1114.54
> >10
On Jun 2, 12:41 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Jun 2, 7:15 pm, Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here are benchmarks for FreeBSD 6.2, amd64
>
> packet_size x y
> 0 499.57 1114.54
> 1024 499.29 1130.02
> 3072 500.09 1119.14
>
On Jun 2, 7:15 pm, Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > To benchmark this I used a simple tcp server which writes a small
> > (16k)
> > string to the client and closes the connection.
>
> Just a general note: When benchmarking such a network service it would
> b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To benchmark this I used a simple tcp server which writes a small
(16k)
string to the client and closes the connection.
Just a general note: When benchmarking such a network service it would
be valuable to see benchmark results for several data sizes. I'd expect
bette
On Jun 2, 7:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On May 31, 9:13 pm, Rhamphoryncus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On May 30, 2:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Hi, everybody!
>
> > > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
> > > fast thread-based servers. This mi
On May 31, 9:13 pm, Rhamphoryncus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 30, 2:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi, everybody!
>
> > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
> > fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than
> > ThreadingMixIn because i
On May 31, 1:40 pm, "Giampaolo Rodola'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30 Mag, 22:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi, everybody!
>
> > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
> > fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than
> > ThreadingMixIn b
On 30 Mag, 22:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, everybody!
>
> I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
> fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than
> ThreadingMixIn because it doesn't create a new thread on each request.
>
> Is it worth including in
On May 30, 2:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, everybody!
>
> I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
> fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than
> ThreadingMixIn because it doesn't create a new thread on each request.
Do you have any benchmark
