On Jun 2, 12:41 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Jun 2, 7:15 pm, Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here are benchmarks for FreeBSD 6.2, amd64 > > packet_size x y > 0 499.57 1114.54 > 1024 499.29 1130.02 > 3072 500.09 1119.14 > 7168 498.20 1111.76 > 15360 499.29 1086.73 > 31744 500.04 1036.46 > 64512 499.43 939.60 > 130048 499.28 737.44 > 261120 498.04 499.03 > 523264 307.54 312.04 > 1047552 173.57 185.32 > 2096128 93.61 94.39 > > x = ThreadingMixIn replies/s > y = ThreadPoolingMixIn replies/s Well, I'd say you've got yourself a winner. Performance (at least on FreeBSD) seems as good or better for your ThreadPoolingMixin than ThreadingMixin. Is this with the default values of min=5 and max=5 worker threads? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
