It' s my faute that I have not read more deeply the Library
Reference...
In any case the time "wasted" in developping small applications to
number lines and remove comments, triple quoted strings, multiline
instructions etc. has been "useful" to learn the language...
Now I already have the single t
"qwweeeit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact I am implementing a cross-reference tool and working on
> python sources, I don't need the '.' as separator in order to capture
> variables and commands.
if you're parsing Python source code, consider using the tokenize module:
http://docs.pyt
I thank you for your help.
The more flexible solution (Paul McGuire) is interesting but i don't
need such a flexibility. In fact I am implementing a cross-reference
tool and working on python sources, I don't need the '.' as separator
in order to capture variables and commands.
I thank nevertheles
"qwweeeit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Splitting with RE has (for me!) misterious behaviour!
>
> I want to get the words from this string:
> s= 'This+(that)= a.string!!!'
>
> in a list like that ['This', 'that', 'a.string']
> considering "a.string" as a word.
print re.findall("[\w.]+", s)
A pyparsing example may be less mysterious. You can define words to be
any group of alphas, or you can define a word to be alphas concatenated
by '.'s. scanString is a generator that scans for matches in the input
string and returns the matching token list, and the start and end
location of the m
Am Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:51:19 -0800 schrieb qwweeeit:
> Splitting with RE has (for me!) misterious behaviour!
>
> I want to get the words from this string:
> s= 'This+(that)= a.string!!!'
>
> in a list like that ['This', 'that', 'a.string']
> considering "a.string" as a word.
Hi,
try this:
re.
