Michael Hudson wrote:
[snip
>>Obviously therefore anyone seeking to translate their existing code from
>>python to an executable directly using pypy would not be doing it for
>>performance reasons (again, something I'm aware of watching the
>>updates come out and having run svn checkouts at previo
Michael Hudson wrote:
...
> The chance of any random module you have written being rpython is more
> or less zero, so it's not _that_ interesting for you to try to compile
> them with PyPy.
I know - the code I use contains LOTS of generators for example, which
obviously don't fit the requirements
Hi Valentino, Michael, all,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 20:46 +0200, Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone wrote:
> Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it be useful for people to start trying out their modules/code to see
> > if they work with this release, and whether they can likewise be
Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone wrote:
>
>> Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Would it be useful for people to start trying out their modules/code to
>>> see if they work with this release, and whether they can likewise be
>>> translated
"Michael Sparks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Factor of ~450 though is pretty d*^%n cool though :)
I think the ratio was 10 or 100 times higher when first measureable. I
have long expected success but am still impressed.
TJR
--
http://mail.python.org/mail
Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone wrote:
> Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Would it be useful for people to start trying out their modules/code to
>> see if they work with this release, and whether they can likewise be
>> translated using the C/LLVM backends, or would you say this is
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
> pypy-0.7.0: first PyPy-generated Python Implementations
> ==
>
> What was once just an idea between a few people discussing
> on some nested mailing list thread and in a pub became reality ...
> the PyPy deve
Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be useful for people to start trying out their modules/code to see
> if they work with this release, and whether they can likewise be translated
> using the C/LLVM backends, or would you say this is too early? (I'm more
> thinking in terms of it
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
[[... great news ...]]
Would it be useful for people to start trying out their modules/code to see
if they work with this release, and whether they can likewise be translated
using the C/LLVM backends, or would you say this is too early? (I'm more
thinking in terms of it
That's great! Congratulations!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
10 matches
Mail list logo
