Re: RIse and fall of languages in 2012

2013-01-10 Thread Craig Yoshioka
At one point or another I'm pretty sure I've googled "_ sucks" for every language I've ever used- even the ones I like. ie: Python easily more than once. Craig reporting from the road 10550 N Torrey Pines Rd La Jolla CA 92037 work: 858 784 9208 cell: 619 623 2233 On Jan 10, 2013, at 3:32 P

Re: RIse and fall of languages in 2012

2013-01-10 Thread Walter Hurry
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:23:51 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > "In general-purpose scripting languages, Python continues to grow > slowly, JavaScript and Ruby are treading water, and Perl continues its > long decline. According to Google trends, the number of searches for > Perl is 19% of what it wa

Re: RIse and fall of languages in 2012

2013-01-10 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:42:49 -0700, Michael Torrie wrote: >> And from the TIOBE Index, Python is steady at number 8: >> >> http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html > > The TIOBE index is meaningless. Since it's based on google searches, > one could probably guess that an

Re: RIse and fall of languages in 2012

2013-01-10 Thread John Ladasky
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 11:23:51 PM UTC-8, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > One should always be careful pronouncing a language dead or dying, No kidding! https://www.google.com/#q=is+fortran+still+used I usually use the query phrase "Why isn't Fortran dead yet?", but you get a better list of l

Re: RIse and fall of languages in 2012

2013-01-10 Thread Michael Torrie
On 01/10/2013 12:23 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > "In general-purpose scripting languages, Python continues to grow slowly, > JavaScript and Ruby are treading water, and Perl continues its long > decline. According to Google trends, the number of searches for Perl is > 19% of what it was in 2004.